The shifting sea: from soft space to lively space

References

• Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1149–1170. doi: 10.1068/a37304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T., & Sieler, F. (2014). Europeanizing territoriality: Towards soft spaces? Environment and Planning A, 46, 2703–2717. doi: 10.1068/a130037p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2007). The fluid scales and scope of UK spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1478–1496. doi: 10.1068/a38230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009a). Critical reflections on spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2544–2549. doi: 10.1068/a42227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009b). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance. Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–633. doi: 10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010). Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 803–818. doi: 10.1068/c09163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2014). Alternative planning spaces. In I. Deas, & S. Hincks (Eds.), Alternative paths to territorial policy and governance (pp. 73–91). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Haughton, G., Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F., (Eds.) (2015). Soft spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders. London: Routledge, 248pp.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 34, 385–399. doi: 10.1068/a3439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2015). Animated space. Public Culture, 27(2), 239–258. doi: 10.1215/08992363-2841844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & Peters, K. (Eds.) (2014). Water worlds: Human geographies of the ocean. London: Routledge, 196pp.
   Google Scholar
• Backer, H. (2011). Transboundary maritime spatial planning: A Baltic Sea perspective. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 15(2), 279–289. doi: 10.1007/s11852-011-0156-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaltSeaPlan. (online). Planning the Future of the Baltic Sea. Retrieved from http://baltseaplan.eu
   Google Scholar
• Bear, C. (2013). Assembling the sea: Materiality, movement and regulatory practices in the Cardigan Bay scallop fishery. Cultural Geographies, 20(1), 21–41. doi: 10.1177/1474474012463665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. (2015). Planning matter: Acting with things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L., & de Roo, G. (2015). Planning of undefined becoming: First encounters of planners beyond the plan. Planning Theory, 15(1), 42–67. doi: 10.1177/1473095214542631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucquey, N., Fairbanks, L., St. Martin, K., Campbell, L., & McCay, B. (2016). The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: Assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of ‘community’ and ‘environment’. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 75, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., Fitzsimmons, C., Gray, T., & Raggatt, L. (2014). EU marine strategy framework directive and marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 43, 359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calado, H., Ng, K., Johnson, D., Sousa, L., Phillips, M., & Alves, F. (2010). Marine spatial planning: Lessons learned from the Portuguese debate. Marine Policy, 34, 1341–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claydon, J. (2006). Marine spatial planning: A new opportunity for planners. Town Planning Review, 77(2), i–vi. doi: 10.3828/tpr.77.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2008). Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning, COM 791. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2009). European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, COM 248. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, V. (1997). Ecopolitics: The environment in poststructuralist thought. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, E., & Wiggin, J. (2003). Ocean Zoning for the Gulf of Maine. unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder, L., & Norse, E. (2008). Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32(5), 772–778. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Crown Estate. (online). The Crown Estate. Retrieved from https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., Nadin, V., Hart, T., Davoudi, S., Pendlebury, J., Vigar, G., … Townshend, T. (2015). Town and country planning in the UK (15th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. (Eds.) (2009). Conceptions of space and place in strategic spatial planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I., Haughton, G., & Hincks, S. (2015). The Atlantic gateway and evolving spatial imaginaries in North West England. In P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling, & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), Soft spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 25–44). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dembski, S. (2015). Structure and imagination of changing cities: Manchester, Liverpool and the spatial in-between. Urban Studies, 52(9), 1647–1664. doi: 10.1177/0042098014539021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). (2006). A Marine Bill, consultation document. London: Defra.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). (2007). A Sea Change: A Marine Bill White Paper, Cm 7047. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). (2009). Consultation on marine plan areas within the English Inshore and English offshore marine regions. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). (2011). A description of the marine planning system for England. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Douvere, F. (2008). The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32(5), 762–771. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douvere, F., & Ehler, C. (2009). New perspectives on sea use management: Initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehler, C., & Douvere, F. (2007). Visions for a sea change. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Ehler, C., & Douvere, F. (2009). Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• English Nature. (2003). Review of how the land use planning system could influence the development of a marine spatial planning system for England. Peterborough: English Nature.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (online). Maritime spatial planning. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/maritimeaffairs/policy/maritime_spatial_planning/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament & Council (EPC). (2014). Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Maritime Spatial Planning, Official Journal of the European Union, L 257, 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2013). Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality and soft planning: A critical review. Environment & Planning A, 45, 1302–1317. doi: 10.1068/a45299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (2012). A roadmap for marine spatial planning: A critical examination of the European Commission’s guiding principles. Marine Policy, 36, 265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., O’Hagan, A. M., O’Mahony, C., Ritchie, H., & Twomey, S. (2015). Evaluating conditions for transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: Challenges and opportunities on the island of Ireland. Marine Policy, 51, 86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazão Santos, C., Domingos, T., Ferreira, M. A., Orbach, M., & Andrade, F. (2014). How sustainable is sustainable marine spatial planning? The Portuguese experience. Marine Policy, 49, 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1993). Towards a non-Euclidean mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(3), 482–484. doi: 10.1080/01944369308975902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2004). Strategic spatial planning and the longer range. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(1), 49–67. doi: 10.1080/1464935042000185062
   Google Scholar
• Gee, K., Kannen, A., & Heinrichs, B. (2011). Baltseaplan vision 2030: Towards the sustainable planning of Baltic Sea Space. Hamburg: BaltSeaPlan.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland, P., & Laffoley, D. (2008). Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32(5), 787–796. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, M., Fieseler, C., Cantral, L., McClellan, K., Pendleton, L., & Crowder, L. (2012). Coming to the table: Early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 36, 1139–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Healey, P. (1999). Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 7(5), 623–646. doi: 10.1080/09654319908720542
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, D., Kuokkanen, T., & Soininen, N. (Eds.). (2015). Transboundary maritime spatial planning: A legal perspective. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2015). Fluid spatial imaginaries: Evolving estuarial city-regional spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(5), 857–873. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The New spatial planning: Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2007). Stretching beyond the horizon: A multiplanar theory of spatial planning and governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2010). Strategic navigation in an ocean of theoretical and practice complexity. In J. Hillier, & P. Healey (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to planning theory (pp. 447–480). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, A. (2013). Managing competition for marine space using the tools of planning in the UK. Planning Practice & Research, 28(5), 503–526. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2013.812375
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2008). Bindings against boundaries; entanglements of life in an open world. Environment & Planning A, 40, 1796–1810. doi: 10.1068/a40156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, H., Kidd, S., & Kvinge, T. (2013). A spatial typology for the sea: A contribution from the Baltic. Marine Policy, 42, 190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, S. (2010). Built at Sea: Marine management and the construction of marine spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 81(2), 173–192. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2009.33
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S. (2012). Marine space: Manoeuvring towards a relational understanding. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.662383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, S. (2013). From disunited sectors to disjointed segments? Questioning the functional zoning of the seas. Planning Theory and Practice, 14(4), 509–525. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2013.848291
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S. (2015). Transboundary maritime spatial planning in the Irish Sea. In D. Hassan, T. Kuokkanen, & N. Soininen (Eds.), Transboundary maritime spatial planning: A legal perspective (pp. 174–188). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S., Flannery, W., Vince, J, Liu, W, Xue, J. G, Matczak, M … Dean, H. (2013). International progress in marine spatial planning. In A. Chircop, S. Coffen-Smout, & M. McConnell (Eds.), Ocean yearbook (Vol. 27, pp. 171–212). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Lieberknecht, L., & Qiu, W. (2016). Marine spatial planning in reality. Marine Policy, 71, 256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., Gray, L., Shucksmith, R., & Tweddle, J. (2014). Review and evaluation of marine spatial planning in the Shetland Islands. Marine Policy, 46, 152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, S., Johnson, K., & Side, J. C. (2014). Planning at the edge: Integrating across the land sea divide. Marine Policy, 47, 118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, S., & Ellis, G. (2012). From the land to sea and back again? Using terrestrial planning to understand the process of marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.662382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knol, M. (2011). Mapping ocean governance: From ecological values to policy instrumentation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(7), 979–995. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2010.547686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, J. (2013). Relating to the sea: Enlivening the ocean as an actor in Eastern Sri Lanka. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31, 485–501. doi: 10.1068/d24010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelock, J. (1987). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 157pp.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process (4th ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press. 332pp.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Schmitt, P. (2012). When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Environment and Planning A, 44, 263–280. doi: 10.1068/a44188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSPP Consortium. (2006). Marine Spatial Planning Pilot: Final Report, unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• NIRAS (2017). Cross-border cooperation in maritime spatial planning. Brussels: European Commission, 110 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Odum, H. T. (1983). Systems ecology: An introduction. New York: Wiley. 644pp.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2012). Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 910–923. doi: 10.1068/c11241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. (2016). When soft planning and hard planning meet. European Journal of Spatial Development, 61, online.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, W., & Jones, P. (2013). The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe. Marine Policy, 39, 182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, F., & Olsson, P. (2013). Institutional entrepreneurs, global networks, and the emergence of international institutions for ecosystem-based management: the Coral Triangle initiative. Marine Policy, 38, 195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). (2007). The Marine White Paper: A Consultation Response by the RTPI, unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, G., & Zeller, D. (2003). From Mare Liberum to Mare Reservarum. Marine Policy, 27(1), 75–78. doi: 10.1016/S0308-597X(02)00054-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., & Tate, L. (Eds.) (2016). Actor networks of planning: Exploring the influence of actor network theory. London: Routledge, 249pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sartorio, F. S. (2005). Strategic spatial planning: A historical review of approaches, its recent revival, and an overview of the state of the art in Italy. disP - The Planning Review, 162, 26–40. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2005.10556930
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2013). European integration and spatial rescaling in the Baltic Region: Soft spaces, soft planning and soft security. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 680–693. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2013). European integration and spatial rescaling in the Baltic Region: soft spaces, soft planning and soft security. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 680–693. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P., & Peters, K. (2015). Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D, 33, 247–264. doi: 10.1068/d14148p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez de Vivero, J. L. (2007). The European vision for oceans and seas. Marine Policy, 31(4), 409–414. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2006.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafon, R. (2017). Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y. (2015). The international Law of the Sea (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Press. 548pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., Gallent, N., & Morphet, J. (2010). An anatomy of spatial planning: Coming to terms with the spatial element in UK planning. European Planning Studies, 18(2), 239–257. doi: 10.1080/09654310903491572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, A. (2013). Scalar reorganisation of marine governance in Europe. Marine Policy, 39, 322–332. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Tyldesley, D. (2004). Making the Case for Marine Spatial Planning in Scotland, unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP & GEF-STAP. (2014). Marine spatial planning in practice: Transitioning from planning to implementation. Nairobi: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (online). Marine Spatial Planning Programme. Retrieved from http://msp.ioc-unesco.org/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2006). Marine and coastal ecosystems and human wellbeing. Naiobi: Author, 76pp.
   Google Scholar
• van Schaick, J., & Klaasen, I. (2011). The Dutch layers approach to spatial planning and design. European Planning Studies, 19(10), 1775–1796. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.614387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J. (2017). Transboundary marine spatial planning: A reflexive marine governance experiment? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, M. A, Atkins, S. M, Lumb, C. M, Golding, N, Lieberknecht, L. M, & Webster, M. (2004). Marine Nature Conservation and Sustainable Development: The Irish Sea Pilot, Report to Defra, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Peterborough.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J. (2014). Sea basin maritime spatial planning: A case study of the Baltic Sea region and Poland. Marine Policy, 50, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar