A ‘delivery-democracy dilemma’? Mapping and explaining policy change for public engagement with energy infrastructure

References

• Aitken, M., Seonaidh, M., & Strachan, P. (2008). Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: The (not so) influential role of local objectors. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(6), 777–799. doi: 10.1080/09640560802423566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annisette, M., & Richardson, A. J. (2011). Justification and accounting: Applying sociology of worth to accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(2), 229–249. doi: 10.1108/09513571111100690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, I., Buijs, A. E., & Verschoor, G. (2017). Regimes of justification: Competing arguments and the construction of legitimacy in Dutch nature conservation practices. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1319346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2002). The anti-political economy. Economy and Society, 31(2), 268–284. doi: 10.1080/03085140220123162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2015a). The role of (de-)essentialisation within siting conflicts: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2015b). Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from social representations theory. Public Understanding of Science, 24, 311–325. doi: 10.1177/0963662513514165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. (2012). Planning with things. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 182–190. doi: 10.1177/0739456X11435415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blears, H. (2008, November 5). Building up to better plans. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/joepublic/2008/nov/05/planning-bill-blears.
   Google Scholar
• Blowers, A., & Leroy, P. (1994). Power, politics and environmental inequality: A theoretical and empirical analysis of ‘peripheralisation’. Environmental Politics, 3, 197–228. doi: 10.1080/09644019408414139
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. (Gregory Elliot, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay in technical democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, D. (2014, March 6). Eric Pickles guilty of “double standards” over energy planning applications. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Cass, N., Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2010). Good neighbours, public relations and bribes: The politics and perceptions of community benefit provision in renewable energy development in the UK. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 12(3), 255–275. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2010.509558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., & Longhurst, N. (2016). Participation in transition(s): reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 585–607. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. (2010). Open source planning. Policy Green Paper no. 14. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. (2015). Strong leadership, A clear economic plan, A brighter more secure future. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., & Devine-Wright, P. (2010). NIMBYism and community consultation in electricity transmission network planning. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation (pp. 115–130). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. (2017). Siting dynamics in energy transitions: How generating electricity from natural gas saves cherished landscapes. In S. Bouzarovski, M. Pasqualetti, & C. Broto (Eds.), The Routledge research companion to energy geographies (pp. 167–183). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011). Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice – the role of community benefits in wind farm development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(4), 539–557. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2010.521047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., Bristow, G., Munday, M., & Strachan, P. (2008). Wind farm development in Wales: Assessing the community benefits. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P. A., & Toke, D. (2016). Energy transitions, sub-national government and regime flexibility: How has devolution in the United Kingdom affected renewable energy development? Energy Research and Social Science. Retrieved from http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S2214629616302419
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2004). Place. A short introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, A. (2015). Runaway train: Public participation and the case of HS2. Policy and Politics, 43(1), 27–44. doi: 10.1332/030557312X655963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government). (2016). Planning Practice Guidance: Renewable and Low Carbon Energy. Retrieved from http://planningguidance.communities.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change). (2011). Overarching national policy statement for energy (EN-1). London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change). (2012). Gas generation strategy, Cm8407. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change). (2014). UK solar PV strategy part 2: Delivering a brighter future. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441. doi: 10.1002/casp.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., & Devine-Wright, H. (2006). Social representations of intermittency and the shaping of public support for wind energy in the UK. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 25(3-4), 243–256. doi: 10.1504/IJGEI.2006.008994
   Google Scholar
• DTI. (2007). Meeting the energy challenge: A white paper for energy. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ENDS Report. (2015, August 8–9). Energy bill threat to renewables and growth. ENDS Report 486.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. (2013). Urban politics and the social practices of critique and justification: Conceptual insights from French pragmatism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(5), 639–657. doi: 10.1177/0309132512469763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., … Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896–913. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedkoop, F., & Devine-Wright, P. (2016). Partnership or placation? The role of TRUST and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects. Energy Research for Social Science, 17, 135–146. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C., Munday, M., & Yakovleva, N. (2013). Fighting the pipe: Neo-liberal governance and barriers to effective community participation in energy infrastructure planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(2), 340–356. doi: 10.1068/c11331r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchwell, P. (2015, April 29–33). Nuclear: will heat turn to light? ENDS Report 482.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, L. (2012, April 19). National body opposing wind power to launch in Westminster. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/19/national-body-opposing-wind-parliament
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2016). Shale wealth fund: consultation (Vol. August). London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2010). Dissolution of the social: On the social theory of Luc Boltanksi and Laurent Thévenot. Constellations (Oxford, England), 17(3), 376–389.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee. (2014). The economic impact on UK energy policy of shale gas and oil, 3rd report of session 2013–2014, HL Paper 172.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S., Horbarty, R., & Ellis, G. (2012). Social acceptance of wind power projects: Learning from trans-national experience. In J. Szarka, R. Cowell, G. Ellis, P. Strachan, & C. Warren (Eds.), Learning from wind power: Governance and societal perspectives on sustainable energy (pp. 215–234). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (1997). Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions. In J. Foster (Ed.), Valuing nature: Economics, ethics and environment (pp. 211–231). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C. (2014). Politicising UK energy: What ‘speaking energy security’ can do. Policy and Politics, 42(2), 259–274. doi: 10.1332/030557312X655990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments – from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Armeni, C., Cendra, J. D., Chaytor, S., Lock, S., Maslin, M., … Rydin, Y. (2013). Public participation and climate change infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Law, 25, 33–62. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqs027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. (2016). Infrastructure planning: In a state of panic? Urban Policy and Research, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2016.1235033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKerron, G. (2009). Lessons from the UK on urgency and legitimacy in energy policymaking. In I. Scrase & G. MacKerron (Eds.), Energy for the future. A new agenda (pp. 76–88). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marinetto, M. (2003). Who wants to be an active citizen? The politics and practice of community involvement. Sociology, 37(1), 103–120. doi: 10.1177/0038038503037001390
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780. doi: 10.1177/0306312706077367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Lezaun, J. (2011). Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society, 40(4), 489–509. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.602293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2012). Planning major infrastructure. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T., & Cowell, R. (2016). Infrastructure, planning and the command of time. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(8), 1843–1866. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16642768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. (2014, October 18). Eric Pickles accused of ‘rejecting wind farms to win votes’. The Independent.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., Allmendinger, P., & Oosterlynck, S. (2015). Planning against the political. Democratic deficits in european territorial governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moini, G. (2011). How participation has become a hegemonic discursive resource: Towards an interpretivist research agenda. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 149–168. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576524
   Google Scholar
• Ophuls, W. (1973). Leviathan or oblivion? In H. E. Daly (Ed.), Toward a steady-state economy (pp. 215–230). San Francisco: W H Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T., Kemp, R., & Purdue, M. (1988). Sizewell B. An anatomy of the inquiry. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Owens S. (1985). Energy, participation and planning: The case of electricity generation in the United Kingdom. In F. Calzonetti & B. Soloman (Eds.), Geographical dimensions of energy (pp. 225–253). Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. (2004). Siting, sustainable development and social priorities. Journal of Risk Research, 7, 101–114. doi: 10.1080/1366987042000158686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhill, K., Demski, C., Butler, C., Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2013). Transforming the UK energy system: Public values, attitudes and acceptability – synthesis report. London: UKERC.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, E. (2011, March 21). Speech to the CBI Annual Dinner.
   Google Scholar
• Short, L. (2002). Wind power and English landscape identity. In P. Gipe (Ed.), Wind power in view: Energy landscapes in a crowded world (pp. 43–58). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2007). Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3/4), 351–373. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622873
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. (2017). Contestation, contingency and justice in the Nordic low-carbon energy transition. Energy Policy, 102, 569–582. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2014). Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research and Social Science, 1, 83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, E. (2016). Regulatory domain and regulatory dexterity: Critiquing the UK governance of fracking. The Modern Law Review, 79(6), 961–986. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, P., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., & Toke, D. (2015). Promoting community renewable energy in a corporate energy world. Sustainable Development, 23(2), 96–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratton, A. (2009, March 24). Opposing windfarms should be socially taboo, says Ed Miliband. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Szarka, J. (2007). Wind power in Europe. Politics, business and society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M., & Inch, A. (2016). Putting localism in place: Conservative images of the good community and the contradictions of planning reform in England. Planning Practice and Research, 31(2), 174–194. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toynbee, P. (2014, October 28). This war on windfarms is the last Tory sop to UKIP. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, A. (2016, October 6). Fracking given UK go-ahead as Lancashire council rejection overturned. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., & Loorbach, D. (2012). Governing the energy transition. Reality, illusion or necessity? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., & Flinders, M. (2014). Rethinking depoliticisation: Beyond the governmental. Policy and Politics, Special issue, 42(2), 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar