Strategic planning harnessing urban policy mobilities: the gradual development of local sustainability fix

References

• Aalborg Commitments. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.sustainablecities.eu/the-aalborg-commitments
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., & Balducci, A. (2013). Practicing strategic planning: In search of critical features to explain the strategic character of plans. DisP - The Planning Review, 49(3), 16–27. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2013.859001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asikainen, E., & Jokinen, A. (2009). Future natures in the making: Implementing biodiversity in suburban land-use planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 351–368. doi: 10.1080/14649350903229794
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M. E. (1995). Collective centring and collective sensemaking in the stories and storytelling of one organization. Organization Studies, 16(1), 107–137. doi: 10.1177/017084069501600106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Broto, V. C., Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cities and low carbon transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• City of Tampere. (2013). Aalborgin sitoumukset 2012. Katsaus kestävän kehityksen teemoihin Tampereella [Aalborg commitments 2012. Review of urban sustainability in Tampere]. Tampereen kaupunki, kaupunkikehitysryhmä, kestävä yhdyskunta -yksikkö. Retrieved from http://www.tampere.fi/liitteet/a/6F2MQlrRE/Aalborgin_raportti_2012_13_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• City of Tampere. (2015, November 2). Summary. Five-star city centre. Tampere city centre development programme 2015–2030. City Centre Project. City Board of Tampere. Retrieved from http://www.tampere.fi/tiedostot/f/7buwGUnyn/tamperecitycentredevelopmentprogrammesummary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A., & Ward, K. (2012). Researching the geographies of policy mobility: Confronting the methodological challenges. Environment and Planning A, 44, 5–12. doi: 10.1068/a44176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivello, S. (2015). Urban policy mobilities: The case of Turin as a smart city. European Planning Studies, 23, 909–921. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.891568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desfor, G., Laidley, J., Stevens, Q., & Schubert, D. (Eds.). (2011). Transforming urban waterfronts: Fixity and flow. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dierwechter, Y. (2010). Metropolitan geographies of US climate action: Cities, suburbs, and the local divide in global responsibilities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(1), 59–82. doi: 10.1080/15239081003625960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), 299–318. doi: 10.1080/713691907
   Google Scholar
• González, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’. How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48, 1397–1418. doi: 10.1177/0042098010374510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., & Laws, D. (2006). Ordering through discourse. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 249–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamedinger, A. (2014). The mobility and/or fixity of urban and planning policies–The role of divergent urban planning cultures. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21(1), 23–37. doi: 10.2478/esrp-2014-0003
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jocoy, C. L. (2017). Green growth machines? Competing discourses of urban development in Playa Vista, California. Urban Geography, 9, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• John, B., Keeler, L. W., Wiek, A., & Lang, D. J. (2015). How much sustainability substance is in urban visions?–An analysis of visioning projects in urban planning. Cities, 48, 86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, S., & Rothenberg, J. (2017). Neoliberal urbanism, public space, and the greening of the growth machine: New York city’s high line park. Environment and Planning A, 49(8), 1743–1761. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16677969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. (2016). Constructing the narrative of the sustainability fix: Sustainability, social justice and representation in Austin, TX. Urban Studies, 53(1), 149–172. doi: 10.1177/0042098014560501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luederitz, C., Abson, D. J., Audet, R., & Lang, D. J. (2016). Many pathways toward sustainability: Not conflict but co-learning between transition narratives. Sustainability Science, 3(12), 393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Jarenko, K., Nilsson, K. L., & Saglie, I. L. (2015). Legitimacy of informal strategic urban planning – observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 349–366. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.861808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2011). Introduction. Urban assemblages: Territories, relations, practices, and power. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. xiii–xxxv). London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 299–314. doi: 10.1080/15239080701631544
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. T. (2012). Governing narratives: Symbolic politics and policy change. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D., Robinson, J., Olsson, L., Kriebel, D., & Loorbach, D. (2014). The future of sustainability science: A solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustainability Science, 9(2), 239–246. doi: 10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, C., & Anguelovski, I. (2017). Farming the urban fringes of Barcelona: Competing visions of nature and the contestation of a partial sustainability fix. Geoforum, 82, 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2012). Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 188–203. doi: 10.1177/0309132511417659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauws, W., & De Roo, G. (2016). Adaptive planning: Generating conditions for urban adaptability. Lessons from Dutch organic development strategies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43, 1052–1074. doi: 10.1177/0265813516658886
   Google Scholar
• Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosol, M. (2013). Vancouver’s “EcoDensity” planning initiative: A struggle over hegemony? Urban Studies, 50, 2238–2255. doi: 10.1177/0042098013478233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2010). Land, property rights, and planning in Japan: Institutional design and institutional change in land management. Planning Perspectives, 25(3), 279–302. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2010.481178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2012). Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 103–116. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2011.644084
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 317–332. doi: 10.1080/14649350903229752
   Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2012). The local politics of policy mobility: Learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1389–1406. doi: 10.1068/a44314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2012). Spatial planning and governance: Understanding UK planning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tretter, E. (2013). Sustainability and neoliberal urban development: The environment, crime and the remaking of Austin’s downtown. Urban Studies, 50, 2222–2237. doi: 10.1177/0042098013478234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eeten, J. M. (2007). Narrative policy analysis. In F. Fischer & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 251–272). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, N. (2016). Municipalities’ ambitions and practices: At risk of hypocritical sustainability transitions? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(3), 361–378. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1099425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• While, A., Jonas, A. E., & Gibbs, D. (2004). The environment and the entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 549–569. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiek, A., & Iwaniec, D. (2014). Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 9, 497–512. doi: 10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2016). Cities and systemic change for sustainability: Prevailing epistemologies and an emerging research agenda. Sustainability, 8(2), 144. doi: 10.3390/su8020144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar