A dominant coalition and policy change: an analysis of shale oil and gas politics in India

References

• Administration, U.S. Energy Information. (2013). Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources: An assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States (Vol. 2013). Washington, DC: Independent Statistics & Analysis, US Department of Energy Location.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagchi, I. (2013, January 2). Tapping diverse energy sources remains the government’s top priority. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2010). Determinants of redistributive politics: An empirical analysis of land reforms in West Bengal, India. The American Economic Review, 100(4), 1572–1600. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.4.1572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, V., & Werner, A. (2014). One step forward, one step back: Shale gas in Denmark and Sweden. European Management & Public Affairs Studies, 1, 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Beverwijk, J., Goedegebuure, L., & Huisman, J. (2008). Policy change in nascent subsystems: Mozambican higher education policy 1993–2003. Policy Sciences, 41, 357–377. doi: 10.1007/s11077-008-9072-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, T., & Johnson, C. (2012). The shale gas revolution: U.S. and EU policy and research agendas. Review of Policy Research, 29(4), 570–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00575.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2013). The Comparative Politics of Fracking: Networks and Framing in the US and Europe. APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Boudet, H., Schaffer, C., Clarke, D., Bugden, E., Maibach, R.-R. C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy, 65, 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. (2009). We speak for the trees: Media reporting on the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 431–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. (2010). Indian media representations of climate change in a threatened journalistic ecosystem. Climatic Change, 99, 17–25. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9807-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chailleux, S., & Moyson, S. (2016). The French Ban on hydraulic fracturing and the attempts to reverse it: Social mobilization, professional forums, and coalition strategies. In C. M. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold, & M. Fischer (Eds.), Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing (pp. 115–145). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. E., Hart, P. S., Schuldt, J. P., Evensen, D. T. N., Boudet, H. S., Jacquet, J. B., & Stedman, R. C. (2015). Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, Top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy, 81, 131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., & Shah, A. (2013). Introduction: The underbelly of the Indian Boom. Economy and Society, 42(3), 335–347. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2013.790655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D. (2010). Local media and experts: Sources of environmental policy initiation? Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 143–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., & Fisk, J. M. (2014). Energy abundance or environmental worries? Analyzing public support for fracking in the United States. Review of Policy Research, 31(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutch, J. (2011). The good news about Gas: The natural gas revolution and its consequences. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 82–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidelman, P., Evans, L. S., Foal, S., Weible, C., von Heland, F., & Elgin, D. (2014). Coalition cohesion for regional marine governance: A stakeholder analysis of the coral triangle initiative. Ocean & Coastal Management, 95, 117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. (2014). Coalition structures and policy change in a consensus democracy. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 344–366. doi: 10.1111/psj.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global 500 2014. (2014). Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/global500/
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. Integrated energy policy, report of the expert committee. New Delhi: Government of India, Planning Commission. August 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. (2013). Policy guidelines for exploration and exploitation of shale gas and oil by national oil companies under nomination regime-reg. O-32011/41/2009-ONG-I (New Delhi). Retrieved from http://petroleum.nic.in/docs/oidb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., Berardo, R., Weible, C., & Yi, H. (2018). A comparative view of advocacy coalitions: Exploring shale development politics in the United States, Argentina, and China. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., Pierce, J. J., Gallaher, S., Kagan, J., Crow, D. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 31(2), 65–87. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., & Olofsson, K. L. (2017). Lessons from state-level and national-level policy conflicts over U.S. Shale development. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 59(3), 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, A. D., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Policy change in comparative contexts: Applying the advocacy coalition framework outside of Western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), 299–312. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2014.941200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S., Weible, C. M., & Park, K. (2016). Policy processes in South Korea through the lens of the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 9(3), 274–290. doi: 10.1080/17516234.2016.1201877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaswal, R. (2012, April 27). Oil ministry holds back nod to arrow energy for china links. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaswal, R. (2013a, August 13). Only ONGC, OIL may get to explore shale resources: Oil ministry. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaswal, R. (2013b, August 31). Shale oil and gas exploration policy is ready: Petroleum secretary. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaswal, R. (2013c, October 18). Coal India is not an expert in exploration of coal-bed methane: Veerappa Moily. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, C. (2002). Caste, class, and clientelism: A political economy of everyday corruption in rural north India. Economic Geography, 78(1), 21–41. doi: 10.2307/4140822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 183–223). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., & Narain, V. (2014). Public policy and governance in India. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 18(4), 257–260. doi: 10.1177/0972262914555815
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., Montpetit, E., & Gauvin, J. (2014). Public perceptions of expert credibility on policy issues: The role of expert framing and political worldviews. Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 674–697. doi: 10.1111/psj.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, M., & Sharma, D. K. (2013). Efficiency of guar seed futures market in India: An empirical study. The IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 19(2), 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mooij, J. (2007). Is there An Indian policy process? An investigation into two social policy processes. Social Policy & Administration, 41(4), 323–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00556.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D., & Olofsson, K. L. (2016a). Advocacy coalition politics and strategies on hydraulic fracturing in Sweden. In C. M. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold, & M. Fischer (Eds.), Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing (pp. 147–175). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D., & Olofsson, K. L. (2016b). A review of applications of the advocacy coalition framework in Swedish policy processes. European Policy Analysis, 2(2), 18–42.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, K. L., Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., & Martel, J. C. (2017). Using nonprofit narratives and news media framing to depict air pollution in Delhi, India. Environmental Communication, 8, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1309442
   Google Scholar
• Pachauri, S., & Jiang, L. (2008). The household energy transition in India and China. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4022–4035. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PDPU Signs MoU with American University for Exchange Program. (2010, January 16). Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B. G., & Borick, C. (2013). Conventional politics for unconventional drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania’s early move into fracking policy development. Review of Policy Research, 30(3), 321–340. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajghatta, C. (2013, June 5). Lawmakers ‘Energize’ US-India ties talking natural gas. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to Identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. doi: 10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Shah, G., & Oommen, T. K. (2011). Social movements in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(21), 33.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Sharma, N. N., & Jha, U. (2014). Think tanks, research influence and public policy in India. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 18(4), 289–297. doi: 10.1177/0972262914552173
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S. (2013, September 17). As government readies shale policy, companies like RIL, Cairn, Essar bet on shale gas exploration. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Surel, Y. (2000). The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(4), 495–512. doi: 10.1080/13501760050165334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., & Fischer, M. (eds.). (2016). Comparing coalition politics: Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing in North American and Western Europe. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2012). The global anti-hydraulic fracturing movement: What It wants, How It operates and what’s next. London: Control Risks.
   Google Scholar
• Zachariah, R. (2010, April 10). RIL to buy 40% in atlas energy’s shale gas field. Times of India. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar