1,166
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Planning, ‘politics’ and the production of space: the formulation and application of a framework for examining the micropolitics of community place-making

ORCID Icon &
Pages 117-133 | Received 28 Mar 2018, Accepted 24 Jul 2018, Published online: 10 Aug 2018

References

  • Allen, C., & Crookes, L. (2009). Fables of the reconstruction: A phenomenology of ‘place shaping’ in the North of England. Town Planning Review, 80, 455–480. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2009.7
  • Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Postpolitical spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x
  • Atkinson, A. (2013). Readjusting to reality: Urban and peri-urban agriculture to ease the downward passage. City, 17(1), 85–96. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2012.709405
  • Attoh, K. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 669–685. doi: 10.1177/0309132510394706
  • Baker, L. E. (2004). Tending cultural landscapes and food citizenship in Toronto's community gardens. Geographical Review, 94(3), 305–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00175.x
  • Barron, J. (2017). Community gardening: Cultivating subjectivities, space and justice. Local Environment, 22(9), 1142–1158. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2016.1169518
  • Bassett, K. (2014). Rancière, politics, and the occupy movement. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 886–901. doi: 10.1068/d5013
  • Benson, M. (2012). A sociological understanding of allotments in ‘The Greater Dublin Area. Retrieved from http://www.urbanallotments.eu/case-studies/ireland.html
  • Buser, M. (2012). The production of space in metropolitan regions: A Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change. Planning Theory, 11, 279–298. doi: 10.1177/1473095212439693
  • Butler, C. (2012). Henri Lefebvre: Spatial politics, everyday life, and the right to the city. New York City, NY: Routledge.
  • Carp, J. (2008). Ground-truthing representations of social space: Using Lefebvre’s conceptual triad. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 129–142. doi: 10.1177/0739456X08324685
  • Certomà, C., & Notteboom, B. (2017). Informal planning in a transactive governmentality. Re-reading planning practices through Ghent’s community gardens. Planning Theory, 16, 51–73. doi: 10.1177/1473095215598177
  • Chambers, S. A. (2010). Police and oligarchy. In J.-P. Deranty (Ed.), Jacques Rancière: Key concepts (pp. 57–68). Durham, UK: Acumen.
  • Corcoran, M. P., Kettle, P. H., & O'Callaghan, C. (2017). Green shoots in vacant plots? Urban agriculture and austerity in post-crash Ireland. ACME, 16(2), 306–330.
  • Davidson, M., & Iveson, K. (2015). Recovering the politics of the city––from the ‘post political city’ to a ‘method of equality’ for critical urban geography. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), 543–559. doi: 10.1177/0309132514535284
  • Davis, O. (2013). Jacques Rancière. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Degen, M. M. (2008). Sensing cities: Regenerating public life in Barcelona and Manchester. London: Routledge.
  • Department of the Environment, Housing and Local Government. (2009). Guidelines for planning authorities on sustainable residential development in urban areas. Retrieved from http://www.housing.gov.ie/en/Publications/DevelopmentandHousing/Planning/FileDownLoad%2C19164%2Cen.pdf
  • Dikeç, M. (2005). Space, politics, and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 171–188. doi: 10.1068/d364t
  • Dikeç, M. (2011). Badlands of the Republic: Space, politics and urban policy. Oxford, : Blackwell Publishers.
  • Dikeç, M. (2015) Space, politics and aesthetics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Dikeç, M. (2017). Disruptive politics. Urban Studies, 54(1), 49–54. doi: 10.1177/0042098016671476
  • Dikeç, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2017). Theorizing the politicizing city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41, 1–18. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12388
  • Drake, L., & Lawson, L. J. (2014). Validating verdancy or vacancy? The relationship of community gardens and vacant lands in the U.S. Cities (London, England), 40, 133–142.
  • Eizenberg, E. (2013). From the ground up: Community gardens in New York City and the politics of spatial transformation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Elden, S. (2004). Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the possible. London: Continuum.
  • Enright, T. (2017). The political typology of urban uprisings. Urban Geography, 38(4), 557–577. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1168568
  • Fainstein, S. S., & DeFilippis, J. (2016). Readings in planning theory. Oxford: Wiley.
  • Finn, D. (2014). DIY urbanism: Implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(4), 381–398.
  • Forrest, M. (2011). Allotments in Dublin 1900–1950. Irish Geography, 44(2/3), 265–290. doi: 10.1080/00750778.2011.669136
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction. New York City, NY: Vintage Press.
  • Fox, T. (1989). Using vacant land to reshape American cities. Places, 6(1), 78–81.
  • Francis, M. (2003). Urban open space. Washington: Island Press.
  • Francis, M., Cashdan, L., & Paxson, L. (1984). Community open spaces: Green neighborhoods through community action and land conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Gunder, M., Madanipour, A., & Watson, V. (2017). The Routledge handbook of planning theory. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Harnick, P. (2010). Urban green: Innovative parks for resurgent cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Hassell, M. v. (2002). The struggle for Eden: Community gardens in New York City. Westport: Bergin and Harvey.
  • Healey, P. (2009). The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 277–292. doi: 10.1177/0739456X08325175
  • Hillier, J., & Healey, P. (2010). The Ashgate research companion to planning theory: Conceptual challenges for spatial planning. Abingdon, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  • Honneth, A., & Rancière, J. (2016). Recognition or disagreement: A critical encounter on the politics of freedom, equality, and identity. New York City, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Hynes, P. H. (1996). A patch of Eden: America’s inner-city gardeners. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
  • Ioannou, B., Morán, N., Sondermann, M., Certomà, C., Hardman, M., et al. (2016). Grassroots gardening movements. In S. Bell (Ed.), Urban allotment gardens in Europe (pp. 62–90). London: Routledge.
  • James, I. (2014). The new French philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Kettle, P. (2014). Motivations for investing in allotment gardening in Dublin: A sociological analysis. Irish Journal of Sociology, 22(2), 30–63. doi: 10.7227/IJS.22.2.3
  • Lawton, P., & Punch, M. (2014). Urban governance and the ‘European City’: Ideals and realities in Dublin, Ireland. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 864–885. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12152
  • Leary, M. E. (2009). The production of space through a shrine and vendetta in Manchester: Lefebvre's spatial triad and the regeneration of a place renamed Castlefield. Planning Theory and Practice, 10, 189–212. doi: 10.1080/14649350902884573
  • Leary, M. E. (2013). A Lefebvrian analysis of the production of glorious, gruesome public space in Manchester. Progress in Planning, 85, 1–52. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2012.12.002
  • Lefebvre, H. (1974/1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1995) The right to the city. In Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on cities (pp. 63–181). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
  • Lehtovuori, P. (2010). Experience and conflict: The production of urban space. Abingdon, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Lennon, M. (2017). On ‘the subject’ of planning's public interest. Planning Theory, 16(2), 150–168. doi: 10.1177/1473095215621773
  • Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • MacLeod, G. (2011). Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-democratic city? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2629–2660. doi: 10.1177/0042098011415715
  • Martin, R., & Marsden, T. (1999). Food for urban spaces: The development of urban food production in England and Wales. International Planning Studies, 4(3), 389–412. doi: 10.1080/13563479908721749
  • May, T. (2008). The political thought of Jacques Rancière: Creating equality. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • May, T. (2010) Wrong, disagreement, subjectification. In J.-P. Deranty (Ed.), Jacques Rancière: Key concepts (pp. 69–79). Durham, UK: Acumen.
  • Mayer, M. (2009). The ‘right to the city’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 13(2-3), 362–374. doi: 10.1080/13604810902982755
  • McClintock, N. (2010). Why farm the city? Theorizing urban agriculture through a lens of metabolic rift. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 191–207. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsq005
  • McClintock, N. (2014). Radical, reformist, and garden-variety neoliberal: Coming to terms with urban agriculture's contradictions. Local Environment, 19(2), 147–171. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.752797
  • McKay, G. (2011). Radical gardening: Politics, idealism and rebellion in the garden. London: Frances Lincoln.
  • Merrifield, A. (2006). Henri Lefebvre: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
  • Metzger, J. (2017) Postpolitics and planning. In M. Gunder, V. Watson and A. Madanipour (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of planning theory (pp. 180–193). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Metzger, J., Allmendinger, P., & Oosterlynck, S. (2015). The contested terrain of European territorial governance: New perspectives on democratic deficits and political displacements. In J. Metzger, P. Allmendinger, & S. Oosterlynck (Eds.), Planning against the political (pp. 1–28). London: Routledge.
  • Mitchell, D. (2003). Right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York City, NY: Guilford.
  • Murtagh, A. (2013). Growing amidst decline: Ireland’s grass roots food growing movement. In C. Crowley, & D. Linehan (Eds.), Spacing Ireland: Place, society and culture in a post-boom era (pp. 128–140). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Németh, J., & Langhorst, J. (2014). Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land. Cities (London, England), 40, 143–150.
  • Nettle, C. (2014). Community gardening as social action. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Nietzsche, F. (1909/1961). Thus spoke Zarathustra. London: Penguin Books Limited.
  • Pudup, M. B. (2008). It takes a garden: Cultivating citizen-subjects in organized garden projects. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 39, 1228–1240.
  • Purcell, M. (2014a). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154. doi: 10.1111/juaf.12034
  • Purcell, M. (2014b). Rancière and revolution. Space and Polity, 18(2), 168–181. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2014.911591
  • Purcell, M., & Tyman, S. K. (2015). Cultivating food as a right to the city. Local Environment, 20(10), 1132–1147. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2014.903236
  • Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Rancière, J. (2000). Dissenting words: A conversation with Jacques Rancière, D. Panagia (trans.). Diacritics, 30, 113–126. doi: 10.1353/dia.2000.0016
  • Rancière, J. (2003). Politics and aesthetics: An interview. Angelaki, 8, 194–211.
  • Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. London: Continuum.
  • Rosol, M. (2010). Public participation in post-fordist urban green space governance: The case of community gardens in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 548–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00968.x
  • Rosol, M. (2012). Community volunteering as neoliberal strategy? Green space production in Berlin. Antipode, 44(1), 239–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00861.x
  • Saldivar-Tanaka, L., & Krasny, M. E. (2004). Culturing community development, neighborhood open space, and civic agriculture: The case of Latino community gardens in New York city. Agriculture and Human Values, 21, 399–412. doi: 10.1023/B:AHUM.0000047207.57128.a5
  • Schmid, C. (2008) Henri Lefebvre's theory of the production of space. In K. Goonewarden, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, et al. (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life: Reading Henri Lefebvre (pp. 27–46). London: Routledge.
  • Schmid, C. (2012) Henri Lefebvre, the right to the city, and the new metropolitan mainstream. In N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, & M. Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people, not for profit (pp. 42–62). New York City, NY: Routledge.
  • Severson, R. (1990). United we sprout: A Chicago community garden story. In M. Francis & R. T. Hester (Eds.), The meaning of gardens: Idea, place, and action (pp. 80–85). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Shields, R. (1999). Lefebvre, love and struggle: Spatial dialectics. London: Routledge.
  • Silva, P. (2016). Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach?. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(6), 1040–1051. doi: 10.1177/0265813516657340
  • Simonsen, K. (2005). Bodies, sensations, space and time: The contribution from Henri Lefebvre. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 87, 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2005.00174.x
  • Spirn, A. W. (1984). The granite garden: Urban nature and human design. New York: Basic Books.
  • Stocker, L., & Barnett, K. (1998). The significance and praxis of community-based sustainability projects: Community gardens in Western Australia. Local Environment, 3, 179–189. doi: 10.1080/13549839808725556
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009) The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 601–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
  • Tanke, J. J. (2011). Jacques Rancière: An introduction. London: Continuum.
  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Thompson, M. (2017). LIFE in a ZOO: Henri Lefebvre and the (social) production of (abstract) space in Liverpool. City, 21, 104–126. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1353327
  • Tidball, K. G., & Krasny, M. E. (Eds.). (2014). Greening in the Red zone: Disaster, resilience and community greening. New York: Springer.
  • Tornagi, C. (2014). Critical geography of urban agriculture. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 551–567. doi: 10.1177/0309132513512542
  • Trebitsch, M. (1991) Preface to Lefebvre, H. Critique of everyday life (Vol. 1, pp. ix–xxviii). London: Verso.
  • Warner, S. B. (1987). To dwell is to garden: A history of Boston's community gardens. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  • Webb, D. (2018). Tactical urbanism: Delineating a critical praxis. Planning Theory and Practice, 19(1), 58–73. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2017.1406130
  • Wekerle, G. R. (2004). Food justice movements: Policy, planning, and networks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, 378–386. doi: 10.1177/0739456X04264886
  • Wilson, J. (2013). “The devastating conquest of the lived by the conceived” The concept of abstract space in the work of Henri Lefebvre. Space and Culture, 16, 364–380. doi: 10.1177/1206331213487064
  • Wilson, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (Eds.). (2014). The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticization, spectres of radical politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.