Collaborative governance or private policy making? When consultants matter more than participation in collaborative environmental planning

References

• Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT model. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 14–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., Coyle, M., DeVriese, K., & Schneider, C. J. (2008). Emergent qualitative document analysis. In Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 127–151). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P., & Godschalk, D. (2009). Searching for the good plan: A meta-analysis of plan quality studies. Journal of Planning Literature, 23(3), 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell, R. D., & Ryan, C. M. (2006). Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources, 19(9), 827–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, S., Bodin, Ö., & Sandström, A. (2015). Tracing the sources of legitimacy: The impact of deliberation in participatory natural resource management. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist, W., & Ostrom, E. (1985). Institutional capacity and the resolution of a commons dilemma. The Review of Policy Research, 5(2), 383–394.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D. (2003). Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2005). Transaction costs and contracting: The practitioner perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 326–351.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, G., & Jepson, E. J. Jr. (2011). The effect of mandated planning on plan quality: A fresh look at what makes ‘a good plan’. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(4), 338–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazkiewicz, A., Challies, E., & Newig, J. (2015). Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors Influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany. Land Use Policy, 46(July), 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015a). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015b). Evaluating the Productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, A. M. (2015). Nested localized institutions for adaptive co-management: A history of state watershed management in the Pacific region of the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 28(1), 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York, NY: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Water Council. (2008). Georgia comprehensive state-wide water management plan. Retrieved from https://waterplanning.georgia.gov/sites/waterplanning.georgia.gov/files/related_files/water_plan_20080109.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Water Council. (2018). Regional water planning. Retrieved from https://waterplanning.georgia.gov/regional-water-planning
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M., Hall, D., & Mills, C. (2015). Consultants, consultancy and consultocracy in education policymaking in England. Journal of Education Policy, 30(4), 518–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. D., & Koontz, T. M. (2009). Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 393–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. E. (2012). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jager, N., Challies, E., Kochskämper, E., Newig, J., Benson, D., Blackstock, K. … von Korff, Y. (2016). Transforming European water governance? Participation and river basin management under the EU water framework Directive in 13 member states. Water, 8(4), 156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupe, R., & Funnell, W. (2015). Neoliberalism, consultants and the privatisation of public policy formulation: The case of Britain’s rail industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 29(Supplement C), 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, B., & Koontz, T. M. (2008). Citizen participation in collaborative watershed partnerships. Environmental Management, 41(2), 143–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M. (2005). We Finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Studies Journal, 33(3), 459–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., Carmin, J. A., Steelman, T. A., & Thomas, C. W. (2004). Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? Washington, D.C.: RFF Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., & Johnson, E. M. (2004). One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences, 37(2), 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouw, M. (2014). Designing communication: Politics and practices of participatory water quality governance. International Journal of Water Governance, 4, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kütting, G., & Lipschutz, R. D. (2009). Environmental governance: Power and knowledge in a local-global world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(1), 14–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 549–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Henry, A. D., & McCoy, M. (2010). Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. (2001). Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. The Professional Geographer, 53(2), 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Michael. (1996, May 13). The skeptic: Collaboration has its limits. High Country News. Retrieved from www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=1839
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (2003). Managing the hollow state collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level–and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197–214.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Kvarda, E. (2012). Participation in environmental governance: Legitimate and effective. In K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, & M. Pregernig (Eds.), Environmental governance: The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness (pp. 29–45). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., & Knops, A. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33(02), 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., & Matlock, M. (2005). Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, A., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2014). Legitimacy in co-management: The impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardo, A. M., & Weitkamp, E. (2017). Environmental consultants, knowledge Brokering and policy-making: A case study. International Journal of Environmental Policy and Decision Making, 2(3), 221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., & Thomas, C. W. (2015). Do collaborative groups enhance interorganizational networks? Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 654–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., Ulibarri, N., & Scott, R. P. (2018). Stakeholder involvement in collaborative regulatory processes: Using Automated coding to track attendance and actions. Regulation & Governance. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rego.12199
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. (2001). Coming home: An introduction to collaborative conservation. In P. Brick, D. Snow, & S. van de Wetering (Eds.), Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative Conservation and the American West (pp. 1–12). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stillwell, A., King, C., Webber, M., Duncan, I., & Hardberger, A. (2011). The energy-water nexus in Texas. Ecology and Society, 16(1), Article 2. https://www.consecol.org/vol16/iss1/art2/main.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W. (2003). Bureaucratic landscapes: Interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W., & Koontz, T. M. (2011). Research designs for evaluating the impact of community-based management on natural resource conservation. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 3(2), 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Tulacz, G. J. (2009). The top 500 design firms. ENR: Engineering News-Record, 263(1), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N. (2015). Collaboration in federal hydropower licensing: Impacts on process, outputs, and outcomes. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 578–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N. (2018). Collaborative model development increases trust in and use of scientific information in environmental decision-making. Environmental Science & Policy, 82(April), 136–142.
   Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N., & Scott, T. A. (2017). Linking network structure to collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 163–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P. (2003). Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar