Learning in participatory environmental governance – its antecedents and effects. Findings from a case survey meta-analysis

References

• Aldred, J., & Jacobs, M. (2000). Citizens and wetlands: Evaluating the Ely citizens’ jury. Ecological Economics, 34, 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D. (2008). Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Dzyundzyak, A., Baird, J., Bodin, Ö, Plummer, R., & Schultz, L. (2018). An approach to assess learning conditions, effects and outcomes in environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Plummer, R., Haug, C., & Huitema, D. (2014). Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 27(1), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice. Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D. (2003). Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local Plans based on the principles of collaborative Ecosystem management. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challies, E., Newig, J., Kochskämper, E., & Jager, N. W. (2017). Governance change and governance learning in Europe: Stakeholder participation in environmental policy implementation. Policy and Society, 36(2), 288–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (1996). Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 71–102.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). Does policy learning Meet the standards of an analytical Framework of the policy process? Policy Studies Journal, 46(S1), S48–S68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance Regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., Arwin, Van Buuren, & Nienke, van Schie. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: Joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(6), 675–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazey, I., Evely, A. C., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Kruijsen, J., White, P. C. L., … Trevitt, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation, 40(1), 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the environment. The politics of local knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66 (Special Issue): 66-75.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., Smolinski, S. L., Huitema, D., & Armitage, D. (2018). Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: A review of the scholarship. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 335–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research. Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy Scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Milfin.
   Google Scholar
• Juerges, N., Weber, A., Leahy, J., & Newig, J. (2018). The role of trust in natural resource management conflicts: A Forestry case study from Germany. Forest Science, 64(3), 330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochskämper, E., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., & Newig, J. (2018). Participation for Effective environmental governance: Evidence from European Water Framework Directive implementation. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting Interorganizational research using Key Informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, R. (1993). Case survey Methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1515–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. In P. A. Sabatier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, & M. Matlock (Eds.), Swimming Upstream. Collaborative approaches to Watershed management (pp. 233–258). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., Weible, C. M., Vince, S. R., Siddiki, S. N., & Calanni, J. C. (2013). Fostering learning through collaboration: Knowledge Acquisition and Belief change in Marine Aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1992). Deliberative Democracy and social Choice. Political Studies, XL(Special Issue), 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Adzersen, A., Challies, E., Fritsch, O., & Jager, N. (2013). Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: a variable-based analytical scheme. INFU Discussion Paper No. 37 / 13. Vol. 37/13 (Lüneburg). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2245518
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskämper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental Performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A Framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009a). The case survey method and applications in political science. APSA 2009 Paper. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1451643 (Toronto)
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009b). Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197–214.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Günther, D., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2010). Synapses in the network. Learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecology and Society, 15(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Kvarda, E. (2012). Participation in environmental governance: Legitimate and effective? In K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, & M. Pregernig (Eds.), Environmental governance. The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness (pp. 29–45). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Putka, D. J., Le, H., McCloy, R. A., & Diaz, T. (2008). Ill-structured measurement designs in organizational research: Implications for estimating interrater reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 959–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, R. B. (1988). Policy Making in a Democracy, in The Power of Public Ideas (pp. 123–56), R. B. Reich (ed). Cambridge, MA & London, UK: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2004). The challenge of Integrating deliberation and expertise: Participation and discourse in risk management. In T. L. McDaniels & M. J. Small (Eds.), Risk analysis and society: An interdisciplinary characterization of the field (pp. 289–366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2006). Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy, 23, 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodela, R. (2011). Social learning and natural resource management: The emergence of three research perspectives. Ecology and Society 16 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A Typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2003). Deliberative democracy and the environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. (2002). One question, two answers. In E. L. Miles, A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J. B. Skjærseth, & E. M. Carlin (Eds.), Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence (pp. 3–46). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Bruggen, G. H., Lilien, G. L., & Kacker, M. (2002). Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(4), 469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2002). Unlocking the puzzle of public participation. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 22(3), 179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, Chris, M., & Daniel, Nohrstedt. (2013). The Advocacy Coalition Framework. In Araral Eduardo, Fritzen Scott, Howlett Michael, Ramesh M., & Wu Xun (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. (2015). Puzzling and powering in policy paradigm shifts: politicization, depoliticization and social learning. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 2–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281–304.
   Google Scholar