Just community participation and Border environmental governance: a view from the Border 2020 program

References

• Adams, D., & Hess, M. (2001). Community in public policy: Fad or foundation? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(2), 13–23. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.00205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkin, J. S. (2003). The counterintuitive relationship between globalization and climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 3, 8–13. doi: 10.1162/152638003322469259
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C. (2002). The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Analysis, 22, 739–749. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Border Environmental Cooperation Commission. (2017). About BECC. Retrieved from http://www.becc.org/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Boxelaar, L., Paine, M., & Beilin, R. (2006). Community engagement and public administration: Of silos, overlays and technologies of government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(1), 113–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2006.00476.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buono, F., Pediaditi, K., & Carsjens, G. J. (2012). Local community participation in Italian national parks management: Theory versus practice. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(2), 189–208. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.683937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission for Environmental Cooperation. (2016). About CEC. Retrieved from http://www.cec.org/about-us/about-cec
   Google Scholar
• Coronado, I. (2014). Whither the environmental nongovernmental organizations on multiple regions of the US–Mexico Border? Journal of Borderlands Studies, 29(4), 449–464. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2014.982467
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, S. J., Petterson, M. G., Taylor, P., & Biliki, R. (2004). Maximising Multi-Stakeholder participation in government and community Volcanic Hazard management programs; a case study from Savo, Solomon Islands. Natural Hazards, 33(1), 105–136. doi: 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000035021.09838.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Castro, F., Hogenboom, B., & Baud, M. (Eds.). (2016). Environmental governance in Latin America. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• EPA & SEMARNAT. (2012a). Border 2020: US-Mexico Environmental Program (Government). EPA and SEMARNAT.
   Google Scholar
• EPA and SEMARNAT. (2012b). US-Mexico Border 2020 Response to Comment Report. Retrieved from Border 2020 Program website: https://www.epa.gov/border2020/border-2020-program-framework-and-factsheet
   Google Scholar
• EPA and SEMARNAT. (2015). Highlights Report 2014-2015. Retrieved from Border 2020 Program website: https://www.epa.gov/border2020/border-accomplishments-report-winter-2014-2015
   Google Scholar
• EPA and SEMARNAT. (2016). Highlights Report 2016. Retrieved from Border 2020 Program website: https://www.epa.gov/border2020/border-2020-highlights-report-autumn-2016
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. (2005). Climate and trade: Links between the Kyoto Protocol and WTO. Environment, 47, 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganster, P. (2014). Evolving environmental management and community engagement at the US-Mexican Border. Eurasia Border Review, 5(1), 19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ganster, P., & Lorey, D. E. (2008). The US-Mexican border into the twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Gauna, E. (1998). The environmental justice misfit: Public participation and the paradigm paradox. Stan. Envtl. LJ, 17, 3–72.
   Google Scholar
• Good Neighbor Environmental Board. (2016). Climate change and resilient communities Along the U.S.-Mexico Border: The role of the federal agencies. Retrieved from the U.S. EPA website: https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/faca/gneb-17th-report-climate-change-and-resilient-communities-along-us-mexico-border-role-federal_.html
   Google Scholar
• Harbine, J. (2002). NAFTA Chapter II arbitration: Deciding on the price of free trade. Ecology Law Quarterly, 29, 371–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, P. (1999). Institutional analysis, communicative planning and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 111–121. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9901900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huong, L. (2009). Environmental Governance (Government). United States Environmental Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Husted, B. W., & Logsdon, J. M. (1997). The impact of NAFTA on Mexico’s environmental legacy. Growth and Change, 28, 24–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1997.tb00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Boundary Water Commission. (2019). History of the international boundary water commission. Retrieved from https://www.ibwc.gov/About_Us/history.html
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvam, R. (2017). Meaningful stakeholder consultation. IDB Monographs (Environmental Safeguards Unit); IDB-MG-545.
   Google Scholar
• Kythreotis, A. P., & Jonas, A. E. (2012). Scaling sustainable development? How voluntary groups negotiate spaces of sustainability governance in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(3), 381–399. doi: 10.1068/d11810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, K., Gunnarsson-Östling, U., & Westholm, E. (2011). Environmental scenarios and local-global level of community engagement: Environmental justice, jams, institutions and innovation. Futures, 43(4), 413–423. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverman, D. M., Varady, R. G., Chavez, O., & Sanchez, R. (1999). Environmental issues along the United States-Mexico border: Drivers of change and responses of citizens and institutions. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 24(1), 607–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.24.1.607
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, A. L. (2013). Achieving justice through public participation: measuring the effectiveness of New York's enhanced public participation plan for environmental justice communities (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: Syracuse University SURFACE.
   Google Scholar
• Mahjabeen, Z., Shrestha, K. K., & Dee, J. A. (2003). Rethinking community participation in urban planning: The role of disadvantaged groups in Sydney metropolitan strategy. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, The, 9(1), 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, K. M. (2004). Beyond the stakeholder paradox: To meaningful consultation with community stakeholders.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, C. (2003). ‘Bringing government to the people’: Women, local governance and community participation in South Africa. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 34(4), 469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry, J., Berardi, A., Tschirhart, C., Bignante, E., Haynes, L., Benjamin, R., & de Ville, G. (2015). Indigenous identity and environmental governance in Guyana, South America. cultural geographies, 22(4), 689–712. doi: 10.1177/1474474014560998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumme, S. (2009). Reflections on public participation in environmental protection policy on the US-Mexico border. In Departamento de Estudios Urbanos y Medio Ambiente (Eds.), Retos ambientales y desarrollo urbano en la frontera Mexico-Estados Unidos (pp. 227–252). Tijuana, Mexico: Colegio de la Frontera Norte.
   Google Scholar
• Mumme, S. P. (2015). The evolution of natural resource conservation capacity on the US–Mexico border: Bilateral and trilateral environmental agreements since La Paz. Review of Policy Research, 32(1), 19–39. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumme, S. P., & Collins, K. (2014). The La Paz agreement 30 years on. The Journal of Environment & Development, 23(3), 303–330. doi: 10.1177/1070496514528801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida, J., & Lendo, E. (2015). United States-México Environmental Program Border 2020 Highlights Report. Winter 2014-2015. (Government) (p. 17). EPA and SEMARNAT.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzoli, K., Kozo, J., Ferran, K., Wooten, W., Rangel Gomez, G., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2014). One Bioregion/One health: An integrative narrative for Transboundary planning along the US–Mexico Border. Global Society, 28(4), 419–440. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2014.951316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Redcliff, M. (1995). Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. C. (2003). Democratic decentralisation of natural resources: Institutional choice and discretionary power transfers in Sub-saharan Africa. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 23(1), 53–65. doi: 10.1002/pad.259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, E., & Eeten, M. J. G. (2004). Three—not two—major environmental counternarratives to globalization. Global Environmental Politics, 4, 36–53. doi: 10.1162/glep.2004.4.4.36
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. G. (2004). Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(4), 512–556. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelas Monjardin, L. C., Travieso-Bello, A. C., Sánchez Sánchez, O., & Piñar Alvarez, A. (eds.). (2010). Gobernanza ambiental para el manejo sustentable de recursos: la experiencia de Canadá en México. Xalapa, Ver., México: El Colegio de Veracruz, Universidad Veracruzana, Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Veracruz, Embajada de Canadá en México y la Asociación Mexicana de Estudios sobre Canadá.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R. A. (2002). Governance, trade, and the environment in the context of NAFTA. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 1369–1393. doi: 10.1177/0002764202045009005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santes-Álvarez, R. (2009). Retos ambientales y desarrollo urbano en la frontera México-Estados Unidos. Tijuana: El Colef.
   Google Scholar
• Santilli, M., Moutinho, P., Schwartzman, S., Nepstad, D., Curran, L., & Nobre, C. (2005). Tropical Deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change, 71, 267–276. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-8074-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, A., Ross, H., & Shrestha, K. K. (2008). Common pool approach for water quality management: An Australian case study. Ecological Economics, 68, 461–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. (2003). The justice of environmental justice: Reconciling equity, recognition, and participation in a political movement. In A. Light & A. De-Shalit (Eds.), Moral and political reasoning in environmental practice (pp. 77–106). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., Collins, L. B., & Niemeyer, S. (2017). Adaptation policy and community discourse: Risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics, 26(3), 413–437. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, K. K., & McManus, P. (2008). The politics of community participation in natural resource management: Lessons from community forestry in Nepal. Australian Forestry, 71(2), 135–146. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2008.10676280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. M. (2008). Participation and power: Civic discourse in environmental policy decisions. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siwik, A., Hebard, E., & Jacquez, C. (2012). A critical review of public participation in environmental decision making along the US–Mexican Border. Lessons from Border 2012 and suggestions for future programs. Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research and Policy SCERP Monography Series No, 16, 105-44.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenfeld, D. A., & Mol, A. P. J. (2002). Globalization and the transformation of environmental governance: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(9), 1318–1339. doi: 10.1177/0002764202045009003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. J. (1994). The impact of NAFTA on the US/Mexico Border environment. The Urban Lawyer, 26, 11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar