Debating nature’s value: epistemic strategy and struggle in the story of ‘ecosystem services’

References

• Banzhaf, H. S. (2016). The environmental turn in natural resource economics. Resources for the Future Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-DP-16-27.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2013). Monetary valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 95, 231–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. (1988). Pragmatism, pluralism and the healing of wounds. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 63(3), 5–18. doi: 10.2307/3130079
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1999). Studying British government. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(2), 215–239. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00012
   Google Scholar
• Brondízio, E. S., Gatzweiler, F. W., Zografos, C., & Kumar, M. (2010). The socio-cultural context of ecosystem and biodiversity valuation. In P. Kumar (Ed.), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (pp. 149–182). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. (1952). Resource conservation. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. (1955). Benefit-cost analysis and public resource development. Journal of Farm Economics, 37(4), 676–689. doi: 10.2307/1234629
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., Cumberland, J. H., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., & Franco, C. (2015). An introduction to ecological economics (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., … van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s services. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, G., & Ellison, K. (2012). The new economy of nature. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (1996). The economics of the environment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 90, 165–221.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1981). Extinction. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Holdren, J. (1970). Ecoscience. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. (1995). William K. Reilly: Oral history interview. Retrieved from https://archive.epa.gov/epa/aboutepa/william-k-reilly-oral-history-interview.html
   Google Scholar
• Everard, M. (2017). Ecosystem services: Key issues. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fickret, F., Folke, C., & Gadgil, M. (1994). Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In C.A. Perrings, K.G. Maler, C. Folke, C.S. Holling, & B.O. Jansson (Eds.), Biodiversity conservation (pp. 269–287). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Martín-López, B. (2014). State-of-the-art report on integrated valuation of ecosystem services, OpeNESS deliverable. Retrieved from https://www.openness-project.eu/sites/default/files/Deliverable%204%201_Integrated-Valuation-Of-Ecosystem-Services.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gosselink, J. G., Odum, E. P., & Pope, R. M. (1973). The value of the Tidal Marsh. Working Paper No. 3. Athens: Institute for Ecology, University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (2015). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (forthcoming). Reflections on contested knowledge and those who study it. In M.J. Peterson (Ed), Contesting global environmental knowledge, norms, and governance (pp. 169–180). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. (2016). Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, IPBES deliverables. Retrieved from https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/IPBES-4-INF-13_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (1997). Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions. In J. Foster (Ed.), Valuing nature? Economics, ethics and environment (pp. 211–231). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., Dendoncker, N., Martín-López, B., Barton, D. N., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Boeraeve, F., … Pipart, N. (2016). A new valuation school. Ecosystem Services, 22, 213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, A. M. (Ed.) (1984). Integration of economy and ecology. Stockholm: Askö Laboratory, University of Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1984). Assessing wildlife and environmental values in cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 18(4), 335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenter, J. O., Reed, M. S., Irvine, K. N., O’Brien, L., Brady, E., Bryce, R., … Watson, V. (2014). Shared, plural and cultural values, A UK national ecosystem assessment follow-on phase report. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
   Google Scholar
• Krutilla, J. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. The American Economic Review, 57(4), 777–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kull, C. A., de Sartre, X. A., & Castro-Larrañaga, M. (2015). The political ecology of ecosystem services. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 61, 122–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. (2009). A history of heterodox economics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäler, K. G. (1990). National accounts and environmental resources. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Alier, J. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neil, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26, 277–286. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., & Fiorino, D. (2017). Conceptual innovation and environmental policy. In J. Meadowcroft & D. Fiorino (Eds.), Conceptual innovation in environmental policy (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, Mass: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being. London: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, H. A., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1997). Ecosystem services. In G.C. Daily (Ed.), Nature’s services (pp. 11–19). Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, S. (1991). What price nature? Bioscience, 41, 677–680. doi: 10.2307/1311760
   Google Scholar
• NCA. (2017). InVEST: Integrated valuation of ecosystem services and trade offs. Retrieved from https://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. H. (2017). Containing environmentalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 118–136. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2016.1277251
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odum, E. P. (1953). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Odum, E. P. (1964). The new ecology. BioScience, 14(7), 14–16. doi: 10.2307/1293228
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, K. H. (2007). The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development. Climatic Change, 84(1), 59–73. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9267-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J., & Spash, C. L. (2000). Appendix: Policy research brief conceptions of value in environmental decision-making. Environmental Values, 9, 521–536. doi: 10.3197/096327100129342191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OTA. (1985). Strategic materials: Technologies to reduce U.S. import vulnerability. Washington, DC: US Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual, U., et al. (2010). The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In P. Kumar (Ed.), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (pp. 183–256). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perrings, C. A., Mäler, K. G., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., & Jansson, B. O. (1994). Biodiverisity conservation and economic development. In C. A. Perrings, K. G. Maler, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, & B. O. Jansson (Eds.), Biodiversity conservation (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• RFF. (Undated). RFF’s legacy. Retrieved from https://www.rff.org/about/rff-s-legacy
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. (2005). Trends in the development of ecological economics from the Late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics, 55(2), 262–290. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. (2008). How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the biodiverse trail? Environmental Values, 17(2), 259–284. doi: 10.3197/096327108X303882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. (2009). The new environmental pragmatists, pluralism and sustainability. Environmental Values, 18, 253–256. doi: 10.3197/096327109X12474739376370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2014). Representing green radicalism. Review of International Studies, 40(1), 177–201. doi: 10.1017/S0260210513000077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2016). The wisdom of the many in global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 60(1), 400–412. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqw027
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2017). Global environmental politice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S., & Hannis, M. (2015). Nets and frames, losses and gains. Ecosystem Services, 15, 162–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. (undated). Glossary of terms. Retrieved from https://www.teebweb.org/resources/glossary-of-terms/
   Google Scholar
• Truman, H. S. (1951, January 22). Letter to William S. Paley on the creation of the president’s materials policy commission. Public papers of the presidents of the United States, p. 118. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Gzi2E5SJGM4C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. (2005). Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 55(2), 203–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatn, A., & Bromley, D. W. (1994). Choices without prices without apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(2), 129–148. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J. P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance. In J. P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–30). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Westman, W. E. (1977). How much are nature’s services worth? Science, 197(4307), 960–964. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4307.960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollman, N. (1967). The new economics of resources. Daedalus, 96(4), 1099–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar