A typology of different perspectives on the spatial economic impacts of marine spatial planning

References

• Addams, H., & Proops, J. (2000). Social discourse and environmental policy: An application of Q methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J., & Proops, J. (1999). Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics, 28(3), 337–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkenhagen, J., Döring, R., Fock, H. O., Kloppmann, M. H. F., Pedersen, S. A., & Schulze, T. (2010). Decision bias in marine spatial planning of offshore wind farms: Problems of singular versus cumulative assessments of economic impacts on fisheries. Marine Policy, 34(3), 733–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, J., & Green, L. (2015). Assessing the impact of a new approach to ocean management: Evidence to date from five ocean plans. Marine Policy, 56, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgan, C. S. (2013). The ocean economy of the United States: Measurement, distribution, & trends. Ocean and Coastal Management, 71, 334–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, S., Donaldson, A., & Walker, G. (2005). Structuring subjectives? Using Q methodology in human geography. Area, 37(4), 413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehler, C. N., & Douvere, F. (2009). Marine spatial planning A step-by-step approach (IOC Manual and Guides No. 53). Paris: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4), 517–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Study on the economic effects of maritime spatial planning. Framework. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Blue growth opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth. Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0494&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). The 2018 annual economic report on EU Blue Economy. Brussels. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/79299d10-8a35-11e8-ac6a-01aa75ed71a1
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., Carr, L., & Fahy, F. (2017). On the subject of typology: How Irish coastal communities’ subjectivities reveal intrinsic values towards coastal environments. Ocean and Coastal Management, 146, 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., & Ellis, G. (2016). Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 121–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, D., Vella, M., Brady, C. F., Brown, P., Ravindra, D., & Vaasen-Otten, A. (2018). Response burden management for establishment surveys at four national statistical institutes. Journal of Official Statistics, 34(2), 397–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, K., & Williams, S. (2016). Oceans of discourses: Utilizing Q methodology for analyzing perceptions on marine biodiversity conservation in the Kogelberg Biosphere Reserve, South Africa. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, 188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, T., Hattam, C., & Austen, M. (2017). Recreational use of off shore wind farms: Experiences and opinions of sea anglers in the UK. Marine, 78, 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S. (2013). From disunited sectors to disjointed segments? Questioning the functional zoning of the sea. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(4), 509–525.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., Gray, L., Schucksmith, R., & Tweedle, J. F. (2014). Review and evaluation of marine spatial planning in the Shetland Island. Marine Policy, 46, 152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B. (2014). Q methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mellahi, K., & Harris, L. C. (2016). Response rates in business and management research: An overview of current practice and suggestions for future direction. British Journal of Management, 27, 426–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K. (2015). An inter and intra-regional exploration of the marine sector employment and deprivation in England. Geographical Journal, 181(3), 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K. (2017). Economics of the marine: Modelling natural resources. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K., & O’Donoghue, C. (2012). The Irish marine economy and regional development. Marine Policy, 36(2), 358–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K., & O’Donoghue, C. (2013). The role of the marine sector in the Irish national economy: An input–output analysis. Marine Policy, 37, 230–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K., O’Donoghue, C., & Farrell, N. (2013). The local impact of the marine sector in Ireland: A spatial microsimulation analysis. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(1), 31–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, A. M. (2016). Maritime spatial planning and marine renewable energy. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 148–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSPB. (2004). Potential benefits of marine spatial planning to economic activity in the UK. Plymouth: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Retrieved from https://www.rspb.org.uk/globalassets/downloads/documents/positions/marine/potential-benefits-of-marine-spatial-planning-to-economic-activity-in-the-uk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Santos, C. F., Ehler, C. N., Agardy, T., Andrade, F., Orback, M. K., & Crowder, L. B. (2019). Marine spatial planning. In C. Sheppard (Ed.), World seas: An environmental evaluation, volume III: Ecological issues and environmental impact (pp. 571–592). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmolck, P. (2014). PQMethod v.2.35. Retrieved from http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, S., Brown, G., Peterson, A., & Johnstone, R. (2016). Stakeholder perspectives for coastal ecosystem services and influences on value integration in policy. Ocean and Coastal Management, 126, 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, J., & Acott, T. (2013). Constructing ‘the stade’: Fishers’ and non-fishers’ identity and place attachment in Hastings, south-east England. Marine Policy, 37, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenta, A., & Wigger, U. (1997). Q-methodology: Definition and application in health care informatics Q-methodology: Definition and application in health. Journal of Americal Medical Informatics Association, 4(6), 501–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Putten, I., Cvitanovic, C., & Fulton, E. A. (2016). A changing marine sector in Australian coastal communities: An analysis of inter and intra sectoral industry connections and employment. Ocean and Coastal Management, 131, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, M., Barclay, K., McIlgorm, A., & Mazur, N. (2017). Connections or conflict? A social and economic analysis of the interconnections between the professional fishing industry, recreational fishing and marine tourism in coastal communities in NSW, Australia. Marine Policy, 76, 114–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, M., Quirk, G., McIlgorm, A., & Azmi, K. (2018). Shades of blue: What do competing interpretations of the Blue Economy mean for oceans governance? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 20(5), 595–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Weig, B., & Schultz-Zehden, A. (2019). Spatial economic benefit analysis: Facing integration challenges in maritime spatial planning. Ocean and Coastal Management, 173, 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A., Sandbrook, C., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research. Conservation Biology, 32(5), 1185–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar