1,234
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The post-political nature of marine spatial planning and modalities for its re-politicisation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 170-183 | Received 07 Mar 2019, Accepted 23 Sep 2019, Published online: 16 Oct 2019

References

  • Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(1), 89–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x
  • Bennett, N. J. (2018). Navigating a just and inclusive path towards sustainable oceans. Marine Policy, 97, 139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.001
  • Bennett, N. J., & Dearden, P. (2014). From measuring outcomes to providing inputs: Governance, management, and local development for more effective marine protected areas. Marine Policy, 50, 96–110. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.05.005
  • Beveridge, R., & Koch, P. (2017). The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city. Urban Studies, 54(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1177/0042098016671477
  • Blühdorn, I. (2014). Post-ecologist governmentality: Post-democracy, post-politics and the politics of unsustainability. In J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics (pp. 146–166). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Boucquey, N., St Martin, K., Fairbanks, L., Campbell, L. M., & Wise, S. (2019). Ocean data portals: Performing a new infrastructure for ocean governance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 0263775818822829.
  • Brooker, E. E., Hopkins, C. R., Devenport, E., Greenhill, L., & Duncan, C. (2019). Civil society participation in the Scottish marine planning process and the role of environmental non-governmental organisations. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–23. doi.10.1080/09640568.2018.1532876 .
  • Dean, J. (2014). After post-politics: Occupation and the return of communism. In J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics (pp. 261–278). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • DEFRA. (2011). A description of the marine planning system for England. London: DEFRA.
  • DEFRA. (2014). East Inshore and East Offshore marine plans. London: DEFRA.
  • Ehler, C. N. (2018). Marine spatial planning: An idea whose time has come. In K. L. Yates & C. J. A. Bradshaw (Eds.), Offshore energy and marine spatial planning (pp. 6–17). Oxon & New York: Routledge.
  • Flannery, W., Clarke, J., & McAteer, B. (2019). Politics and power in marine spatial planning. In J. Zaucha & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime spatial planning (pp. 201–217). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Flannery, W., Ellis, G., Nursey-Bray, M., van Tatenhove, J. P., Kelly, C., Coffen-Smout, S., & O’Hagan, A. M. (2016). Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/marine spatial planning: Cui bono?/“More than fishy business”: epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/marine spatial planning: Power and scaping/surely not all planning is evil?/Marine spatial planning: A Canadian perspective/maritime spatial planning–“ad utilitatem omnium”/marine spatial planning: “It is better to be on the train than being hit by it”/Reflections from the perspective of recreational anglers … . Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 121–151. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1131482
  • Flannery, W., Healy, N., & Luna, M. (2018). Exclusion and non-participation in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 88, 32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.001
  • Flannery, W., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (2012a). A roadmap for marine spatial planning: A critical examination of the European Commission’s guiding principles based on their application in the Clyde MSP Pilot Project. Marine Policy, 36(1), 265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.06.003
  • Flannery, W., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (2012b). Deriving lessons relating to marine spatial planning from Canada’s eastern Scotian shelf integrated management initiative. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(1), 97–117. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.662384
  • Flannery, W., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (2012c). Stakeholder participation in marine spatial planning: Lessons from the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary. Society & Natural Resources, 25(8), 727–742. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2011.627913
  • Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 21–44. doi: 10.1177/0002716206296780
  • Harvey, D. (2017). Marx, capital, and the madness of economic reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., & Oosterlynck, S. (2013). Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: Soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(1), 217–234. doi: 10.1068/a45121
  • HM Government. (2011). The UK marine policy statement. London: HMSO, The Stationery Office.
  • Jones, P. J., Lieberknecht, L. M., & Qiu, W. (2016). Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Marine Policy, 71, 256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.026
  • Kelly, C., Ellis, G., & Flannery, W. (2018). Conceptualising change in marine governance: Learning from transition management. Marine Policy, 95, 24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.023
  • Kelly, C., Ellis, G., & Flannery, W. (2019). Unravelling persistent problems to transformative marine governance. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 213. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00213.
  • Kelly, R., Fleming, A., Pecl, G., Richter, A., & Bonn, A. (2019). Social license through citizen science: A tool for marine conservation. Ecology and Society, 24(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-10704-240116.
  • Kirk, E. A., Reeves, A. D., & Blackstock, K. L. (2007). Path dependency and the implementation of environmental regulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(2), 250–268. doi: 10.1068/c0512j
  • Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
  • Metzger, J. (2017). Postpolitics and planning. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory (pp. 180–193). London: Routledge.
  • Mitchell, D., Attoh, K., & Staeheli, L. (2015). Whose city? What politics? Contentious and non-contentious spaces on Colorado’s front range. Urban Studies, 52(14), 2633–2648. doi: 10.1177/0042098014550460
  • MMO. (2013). East Inshore and East Offshore marine plan areas statement of public participation: Revised August 2013. Newcastle upon Tyne: MMO.
  • MMO. (2014a). Analysis of the East Inshore and East Offshore marine plans. Newcastle upon Tyne: MMO.
  • MMO. (2014b). Sustainability appraisal of the East Inshore and East Offshore marine plans, volume 2: Sustainability appraisal. Newcastle upon Tyne: MMO.
  • Morrissey, K. (2017). It’s not just a blue economy moment … . Dialogues in Human Geography, 7(1), 42–44. doi: 10.1177/2043820617691651
  • Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(4), 745–758.
  • Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political ( Vol. 8). London: Verso.
  • Nursey-Bray, M., Palmer, R., & Pecl, G. (2018). Spot, log, map: Assessing a marine virtual citizen science program against Reed’s best practice for stakeholder participation in environmental management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 151, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.10.031
  • Oosterlynck, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Noise reduction: The postpolitical quandary of night flights at Brussels airport. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(7), 1577–1594. doi: 10.1068/a42269
  • Raco, M. (2014). The post-politics of sustainability planning: Privatisation and the demise of democratic government. In J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics (pp. 25–47). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Ritchie, H., & Ellis, G. (2010). A system that works for the sea’? Exploring stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(6), 701–723. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2010.488100
  • Roy, P. (2015). Collaborative planning–A neoliberal strategy? A study of the Atlanta BeltLine. Cities (London, England), 43, 59–68.
  • Sander, G. (2018). Ecosystem-based management in Canada and Norway: The importance of political leadership and effective decision-making for implementation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 163, 485–497. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.005
  • Saunders, F. P., Gilek, M., & Tafon, R. (2019). Adding people to the Sea: Conceptualizing social sustainability in Maritime Spatial Planning. In J. Zaucha & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime Spatial Planning (pp. 175–200). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Smith, G. (2018). Good governance and the role of the public in Scotland’s marine spatial planning system. Marine Policy, 94, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.017
  • Smith, G., & Brennan, R. E. (2012). Losing our way with mapping: Thinking critically about marine spatial planning in Scotland. Ocean & Coastal Management, 69, 210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.016
  • Smith, G., & Jentoft, S. (2017). Marine spatial planning in Scotland. Levelling the playing field? Marine Policy, 84, 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.024
  • St Martin, K., & Hall-Arber, M. (2008). Creating a place for “community” in New England fisheries. Human Ecology Review, 15(2), 161–170.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Impossible sustainability and the post-political condition. In Making strategies in spatial planning (pp. 185–205). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.08.001
  • Tafon, R. V. (2018). Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 258–273.
  • Tafon, R., Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2018). The politics of Estonia’s offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2399654418778037.
  • van Tatenhove, J. P. (2013). How to turn the tide: Developing legitimate marine governance arrangements at the level of the regional seas. Ocean & Coastal Management, 71, 296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.11.004
  • van Tatenhove, J. P. (2017). Transboundary marine spatial planning: A reflexive marine governance experiment? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(6), 783–794. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1292120
  • Wilson, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (2014). Seeds of dystopia: Post-politics and the return of the political. In J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.