Environmental policy expansion in the EU: the intriguing case of bioinvasion regulation

References

• Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (Eds.). (2012). Dismantling public policy: Preferences, strategies, and effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beninde, J., Fischer, M. L., Hochkirch, A., & Zink, A. (2015). Ambitious advances of the European Union in the legislation of invasive alien species. Conservation Letters, 8, 199–205. doi: 10.1111/conl.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., & Meins, E. (2003). Technological revolution meets the market: Explaining cross-national differences in agricultural biotechnology regulation. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 643–683. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunel, S., Fernández-Galiano, E., Genovesi, P., Heywood, V. H., Kueffer, C., & Richardson, D. M. (2013). Late lessons from early warnings: Science, precaution, innovation (Report No. 1/2013). European Environmental Agency (EU).
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C. J., Eckersley, P., & Tobin, P. A. (2019). EU environmental policy in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1561741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čavoški, A. (2015). A post-austerity European Commission: No role for environmental policy? Environmental Politics, 24(3), 501–505. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1008216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2003). European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. T-PVS/Inf (2004)1.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T., & Happaerts, S. (2016). Environmental policy and politics in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate General for Trade of the European Commission. (2011, January). SPS Newsletter [electronic news]. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/january/tradoc_147459.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Essl, F., & Rabitsch, W. (2004). Österreichischer Aktionsplan zu gebietsfremden Arten [Austrian action plan on invasive alien species]. Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management (BMLFUW). Environment Agency Austria. Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.at/fileadmin/site/umweltthemen/naturschutz/Neobiota_Engl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EURACTIV. (2008, December 17). EU admits failure to protect biodiversity [Electronic news]. Retrieved from http://www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/news/eu-admits-failure-to-protect-biodiversity/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008a). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Towards an EU strategy on Invasive Species. 3 December, Brussels: COM(2008) 789 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008b). Developing an EU framework for invasive alien species (Discussion Paper). Directorate-General Environment. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/docs/ias_discussion_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011a). A comparative assessment of existing policies on invasive species in the EU member states and in selected OECD countries (Research Report). 11 September, Brussels. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/docs/IAS_policies_country%20assessments2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011b). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, 3 May, Brussels: COM (2011)244 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. EU Regulatory Fitness, 12, December, Strasbourg: COM (2012) 746 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. 9 September, Brussels: COM (2013) 620 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2014, January). Invasive alien species. Proceedings of the workshop on invasive alien species. Brussels: PE 518.746.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2015, December). Invasive alien species, list of species of union concern. Brussels: PE 573.889.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2005). A rationalist-institutionalist explanation of endogenous regional integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 273–290. doi: 10.1080/13501760500044017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Environmental Agency (FEA). (2003). Economic impact of the spread of alien species in Germany (Research Report No. 201862011). Federal Environmental Agency. Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/2434.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gravey, V., & Jordan, A. (2016). Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 1180–1198. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravey, V., & Jordan, A. (2019). Policy dismantling at EU level: Reaching the limits of ‘an ever-closer ecological union’? Public Administration. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/padm.12605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Great Britain Non-native Species Secretariat (NNSS). (2015). The Great Britain invasive non-native species strategy (Policy Paper). Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-great-britain-invasive-non-native-species-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Gualtieri, D. (2018). Environmental governance of invasive species. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1968). The Uniting of Europe: Political, economic, and social forces, 1950–1957 (2nd edn.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (2016). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11, 33–46. doi: 10.1080/13876980802648144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, P. E., Pysek, P., Nentwig, W., & Vilà, M. (2009). Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science, 324, 40–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1171111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2000). A guide to designing legal and institutional frameworks on alien invasive species (Policy Paper No. 40). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W., & Meunier, S. (2010). Europe and the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 299–317. doi: 10.1080/13501761003662107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Bauer, M. W., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2013). Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 795–805. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.771092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Schout, A., & Zito, A. R. (2004). Coordinating European Union environmental policy: Shifting from passive to active coordination? (CSERGE Working Paper EDM No. 04–05). Norwich UK: University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. (2004). Environmental federalism in the US and the EU. In N. J. Vig, & M. G. Faure (Eds.), Green giants? Environmental policy of the United States and the European Union (pp. 113–134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., & Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2018). Hypocrisy as a crisis response? Assessing changes in talk, decisions, and actions of the European Commission in EU environmental policy. Public Administration. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/padm.12542
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knill, C., Tosun, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2009). Neglected faces of Europeanization: The differential impact of the EU on the dismantling and expansion of domestic policies. Public Administration, 87, 519–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01768.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, J. D., & Andersen, M. S. (1998). Strategies of the ‘green’ member states in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 254–270. doi: 10.1080/135017698343974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A. (2019). Changing the story? The discourse of ecological modernization in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 28(2), 208–227. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1549780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., & Sweet, A. S. (2012). Regional integration and the evolution of the European polity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02224.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeely, J. A., Mooney, H. A., Neville, L. E., Schei, P., & Waage, J. K. (Eds.). (2001). A global strategy on invasive alien species, global invasive species programme. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2002). Ecological modernization and the global economy. Global Environmental Politics, 2(2), 92–115. doi: 10.1162/15263800260047844
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the single European act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European community. International Organization, 45(1), 19–56. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhinard, M. (2010). Framing Europe: The policy shaping strategies of the European Commission. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Russel, D., & Benson, D. (2014). Green Budgeting in an age of austerity: A transatlantic comparative perspective. Environmental Politics, 23, 243–262. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.775727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions, and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130. doi: 10.1080/13501768880000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs, M. A., & Tiberghien, Y. (2007). Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Politics, 7, 19–46. doi: 10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2015). Broader, deeper and greener: European Union environmental politics, policies and outcomes. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 309–335. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shine, C. (2015). Developing invasive species policy for a major free trade bloc: Challenges and progress in the European Union. In R. P. Keller, M. W. Cadotte, & G. Sandiford (Eds.), Invasive species in a globalized world: Ecological, social, and legal perspectives on policy (pp. 303–326). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shine, C., Kettunen, M., Mapendembe, A., Herkenrath, P., Silvestri, S., & Brink, T. (2009). Technical support to EU strategy on invasive species (IAS) – analysis of the impacts of policy options/measures to address IAS (Research Report). European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/docs/Shine2008_IAS_Task%202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skovgaard, J. (2014). EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics, 23(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.818304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinebach, Y., & Knill, C. (2017). Still and entrepreneur? The changing role of the European Commission in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 24, 429–446. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1149207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). (2008). National strategy and action plan for alien species and genotypes (Report No. 5910). Stockholm: SEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Tynkkynen, N. (2015). Baltic sea environment, knowledge and the politics of scale. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(2), 201–216. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.936582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (1997). Trading Up and governing across: Transnational governance and environmental protection. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 556–571. doi: 10.1080/135017697344064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2003). The hare and the tortoise revisited: The new politics of consumer and environmental regulation in Europe. British Journal of Political Research, 33(4), 557–580. doi: 10.1017/S0007123403000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2012). The politics of precaution: Regulating health, safety and environmental risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H., Pollack, M. A., & Young, A. (Eds.). (2015). Policy-Making in the European Union (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R. W., Connelly, J., & Liefferink, D. (Eds.). (2017). The European Union in international climate change politics. Still taking a lead? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (2011). Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting edge themes, and research strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19853–19860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111690108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito, A. R. (2005). Task expansion: A theoretical overview. In A. Jordan (Ed.), Environmental policy in the European Union: Actors, institutions & processes (2nd ed., pp. 141–161). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Zito, A. R., Burns, C., & Lenschow, A. (2019). Is the trajectory of European Union environmental policy less certain? Environmental Politics, 28, 187–207. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1549779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar