416
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Diversifying forest expertise: forest journals narrating policy change

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 268-280 | Received 05 Oct 2017, Accepted 04 Jan 2020, Published online: 31 Jan 2020

References

  • Aasetre, J. (2006). Perceptions of communication in Norwegian forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.06.001
  • Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., & Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the World’s forests. Science, 320(5882), 1460–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.1155369
  • Appelstrand, M. (2012). Developments in Swedish forest policy and administration–from a “policy of restriction” toward a “policy of cooperation”. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 186–199. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2011.635069
  • Arts, B. (2012). Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.003
  • Arts, B., Kleinschmit, D., & Pülzl, H. (2016). Forest governance. In G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, & M. Lamers (Eds.), Practice theory and research: Exploring the dynamics of social life (pp. 202–228). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Bhagwat, S. A., Humphreys, D., & Jones, N. (2017). Forest governance in the Anthropocene: Challenges for theory and practice. Forest Policy and Economics, 79, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.010
  • Birch, K., Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2010). Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of nature and knowledge in the European ‘knowledge-based bio-economy’. Sustainability, 2, 2898–2918. doi: 10.3390/su2092898
  • Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2010). Studying the effects of framing on public opinion about policy issues. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 159–186). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655. doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070554
  • Crow, D. A., Lawhon, L. A., Berggren, J., Huda, J., Koebele, E., & Kroepsch, A. (2017). A narrative policy framework analysis of wildfire policy discussions in two colorado communities. Politics & Policy, 45, 626–656. doi: 10.1111/polp.12207
  • Crow, D. A., & Lawlor, A. (2016). Media in the policy process: Using framing and narratives to understand policy influences. Review of Policy Research, 33, 472–491. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12187
  • D’Angelo, P., & Kuypers, J. A. (Eds.). (2010). Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Edwards, P., & Kleinschmit, D. (2015). National forest policy between change and resistance. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30, 201–203. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1014201
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. Foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ertas, N. (2015). Policy narratives and public opinion concerning charter schools. Politics & Policy, 43, 426–451. doi: 10.1111/polp.12120
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Polity press.
  • Gupta, K., Ripberger, J. T., & Collins, S. (2014). The strategic use of policy narratives: Jaitapur and the politics of siting a nuclear power plant in India. In M. Jones, E. Shanahan, & M. McBeth (Eds.), The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis (pp. 89–106). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hajer, M., & Laws, D. (2006). Ordering through discourse. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 249–266). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7, 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
  • Hänninen, H., Karppinen, H., & Leppänen, J. (2011). Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2010 [Finnish Forest Owner 2010]. Metlan työraportteja 208. Vantaa: Finnish Forest Research Institute.
  • Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., & Pierce, J. J. (2014). Exploring the policy narratives and politics of hydraulic fracturing in New York. In M. Jones, E. Shanahan, & M. McBeth (Eds.), The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis (pp. 185–205). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Huttunen, S., & Hildén, M. (2014). Framing the controversial geoengineering in academic literature. Science Communication, 36, 3–29. doi: 10.1177/1075547013492435
  • Jokinen, A. (2006). Stand/ardization and entrainment in forest management. In Y. Haila & C. Dyke (Eds.), How nature speaks: The dynamics of the human ecological condition (pp. 198–217). Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38, 329–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
  • Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014). Introducing the narrative policy framework. In M. Jones, E. Shanahan, & M. McBeth (Eds.), The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jones, M., Shanahan, E., & McBeth, M. (Eds.). (2014). The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kotilainen, J., & Rytteri, T. (2011). Transformation of forest policy regimes in Finland since the 19th century. Journal of Historical Geography, 37, 429–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2011.04.003
  • Leipold, S., Feindt, P.H., & Winkel, G. (2019). Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21, 445–463. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462
  • Lybecker, D. L., McBeth, M. K., Husmann, M. A., & Pelikan, N. (2015). Do new media support new policy narratives? The social construction of the US–Mexico border on YouTube. Policy & Internet, 7, 497–525. doi: 10.1002/poi3.94
  • Merry, M. K. (2015). Constructing policy narratives in 140 characters or less: The case of gun policy organizations. Policy Studies Journal, 44, 373–395. doi: 10.1111/psj.12142
  • Natural Resources Institute Finland. (2016). Statistical sercvices. Retrieved from http://stat.luke.fi/en/uusi-etusivu
  • O’Bryan, T., Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2014). Narrating the ‘arab Spring’: Where expertise meets Heuristics in legislative hearings. In M. Jones, E. Shanahan, & M. McBeth (Eds.), The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis (pp. 107–129). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ollonqvist, P. (2002). Collaboration in the forest policy arena in Finland – from neocorporatist planning to participatory programme preparation. In E. Gislerud, & I. Neven (Eds.), National forest programmes in a European context (pp. 27–48). Joensuu: European Forest Institute.
  • Parkins, J. R., Dunn, M., Reed, M. G., & Sinclair, A. J. (2016). Forest governance as neoliberal strategy: A comparative case study of the model forest program in Canada. Journal of Rural Studies, 45, 270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.04.006
  • Peltomaa, J., Hildén, M., & Huttunen, S. (2016). Intermediaries and institutional change - Finnish forest journals as forest policy actors. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.029
  • Pierce, J. J., Smith-Walter, A., & Peterson, H. L. (2014). Research design and the narrative policy framework. In M. Jones, E. Shanahan, & M. McBeth (Eds.), The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis (pp. 27–44). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Primmer, E. (2010). Integrating biodiversity conservation into forestry: an empirical analysis on institutional adaptation (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertationes Forestales 109. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
  • Primmer, E., & Wolf, S. A. (2009). Empirical accounting of adaptation to environmental change: Organizational competencies and biodiversity in finnish forest management. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 27. doi: 10.5751/ES-02926-140227
  • Saarikoski, H., Åkerman, M., & Primmer, E. (2012). The challenge of governance in regional forest planning: An analysis of participatory forest program processes in Finland. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 667–682. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2011.630061
  • Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x
  • Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013). An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities. Policy Studies Journal, 41, 453–483. doi: 10.1111/psj.12025
  • Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., Mcbeth, M. K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). The narrative policy framework. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 173–213). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., Hathaway, P. L., & Arnell, R. J. (2008). Conduit or contributor? The role of media in policy change theory. Policy Sciences, 41, 115–138. doi: 10.1007/s11077-008-9058-y
  • Shanahan, E. A., Raile, E. D., French, K. A., & McEvoy, J. (2018). Bounded stories. Policy Studies Journal, 46(4), 922–948. doi: 10.1111/psj.12269
  • Siiskonen, H. (2007). The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 249, 125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.018
  • Takala, T., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M., & Tikkanen, J. (2017). The order of forest owners’ discourses: Hegemonic and marginalised truths about the forest and forest ownership. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.009
  • Winkel, G., & Sotirov, M. (2011). An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of ‘new modes of governance’ in Germany and Bulgaria. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.005
  • Winkel, G., & Sotirov, M. (2015). Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the Gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and a new spirit of integration. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 496–514.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.