Constructing and justifying risk and accountability after extreme events: public administration and stakeholders’ responses to a wildfire disaster

References

• Abatzoglou, J. T., & Williams, A. P. (2016). Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(42), 11770–11775. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607171113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beland Lindahl, K. B., Sténs, A., Sandström, C., Johansson, J., Lidskog, R., Ranius, T., & Roberge, M. J. (2017). The Swedish forestry model: More of everything? Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström, J., Uhr, C., & Frykmer, T. (2016). A complexity framework for studying disaster response management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(3), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivins, T. H. (2006). Responsibility and accountability. In K. Fitzpatrick, & C. Bronstein (Eds.), Ethics in public relations: Responsible advocacy (pp. 19–38). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö, & Nohrstedt, D. (2016). Formation and performance of collaborative disaster management networks: Evidence from a Swedish wildfire response. Global Environmental Change, 41, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. (4. ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calkin, D. E., Cohen, J. D., Finney, M. A., & Thompson, M. P. (2014). How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315088111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: Analyzing global forest governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• County Administrative Board. (2014). Skogsbranden i Västmanland 2014 [The forest fire in Västmanland 2014]. The County Administrative Board of Västmanland.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. L., Ismail-Zadeh, A., Alcantara-Ayala, I., Altan, O., Baker, D. N., Briceno, S., Gupta, H., Holloway, A., Johnston, D., McBean, G. A., Ogawa, Y., Paton, D., Porio, E., Silbereisen, R. K., Takeuchi, K., Valsecchi, G. B., Vogel, C., & Wu, G. (2015). Global risks: Pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature, 522(7556), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/522277a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, K., Brenkert-Smith, H., Champ, P., & Flores, N. (2015). Catching fire? Social interactions, beliefs, and wildfire risk mitigation behaviors. Society & Natural Resources, 28(8), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1037034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• District Court of Västmanland. (2019). DOM 2019-12-09 meddelad i Västerås, Mål nr. B 4839-14. (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Djalante, R., Holley, C., & Thomalla, F. (2011). Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-011-0015-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity – Emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, K.T. (1994). A new species of trouble: explorations in disaster, trauma, and community. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. J. (2016). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. J. (2016). Human-caused climate change is now a key driver of forest fire activity in the western United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(42), 11649–11650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.161292611 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612926113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsson, A., & Jacobsen, U. (2014). Olycksutredning skogsbrand Västmanland. (Dnr: 2014/336-MBR-196). Nerikes Fire Brigade. In Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, A. (2010). A reflection on the Bushfire Royal commission – blame, accountability and responsibility. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00701.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysing, E., & Lidskog, R. (2018). Policy contestation over the ecosystem services approach in Sweden. Society and Natural Resources, 31(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1413719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, J. (2013). Constructing and contesting the legitimacy of private forest governance: The case of forest certification in Sweden. [PhD dissertation]. Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Umeå universitetet, Umeå. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-63948.
   Google Scholar
• Klapwijk, M. J., Boberg, J., Bergh, J., Bishop, K., Björkman, C., Ellison, D., Felton, A., Lidskog, R., Lundmark, T., Keskitalo, E. C. H., Sonesson, J., Nordin, A., Nordström, E.-M., Stenlid, J., & Mårald, E. (2018). Capturing complexity: Forests, decision-making and climate change mitigation action. Global Environmental Change, 52, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2014). Accountable networks. The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, 242–257.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koliba, C. J., Mills, R. M., & Zia, A. (2011). Accountability in governance networks: An assessment of public, private, and nonprofit emergency management practices following Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3 ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R. (2018). Invented communities and social vulnerability: The local post-disaster dynamics of extreme environmental events. Sustainability, 10(12), 4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., Johansson, J., & Sjödin, D. (2019). Wildfires, responsibility and trust: Public understanding of Sweden’s largest wildfire. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1598483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., & Sjödin, D. (2018). Unintended consequences and risk(y) thinking: The shaping of consequences and responsibilities in relation to environmental disasters. Sustainability, 10(8), 2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., & Sundqvist, G. (2013). Sociology of risk. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Essentials of risk Theory (pp. 75–105). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Löfmarck, E., Uggla, Y., & Lidskog, R. (2017). Freedom with what? Interpretations of “responsibility” in Swedish forestry practice. Forest Policy and Economics, 75, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S., Toman, E., Stidham, M., & Shindler, B. (2013). Social science research related to wildfire management: An overview of recent findings and future research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 22(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, M. A., Batllori, E., Bradstock, R. A., Gill, A. M., Handmer, J., Hessburg, P. F., Leonard, J., McCaffrey, S., Odion, D. C., Schoennagel, T., & Syphard, A. D. (2014). Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature, 515(7525), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2004). Constructing accountability: Network governance and managerial agency. Public Policy and Administration, 19(4), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670401900402
   Google Scholar
• Poel, I. V. D., Royakkers, L., & Zwart, S. D. (2015). Moral responsibility and the problem of many hands. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty. Designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry. (2015). Forests and forestry in Sweden. KSLA.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, A., Bodin, Ö, & Crona, B. (2015). Network governance from the top – The case of ecosystem-based coastal and marine management. Marine Policy, 55, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0053-8
   Google Scholar
• Sjökvist, A., & Strömberg, I. (2015). Rapport från Skogsbrandsutredningen. Ministry of Justice. (Dir. 2014:116, Dir. 2015:12).
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman, T. A., & McCaffrey, S. (2013). Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management. Natural Hazards, 65(1), 683–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0386-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S. L., Agee, J. K., Fulé, P. Z., North, M. P., Romme, W. H., Swetnam, T. W., & Turner, M. G. (2013). Managing forests and fire in changing climates. Science, 342(6154), 41–42. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. (2016). Ansvar, samverkan, handling: Åtgärder för stärkt krisberedskap utifrån erfarenheterna från skogsbranden i Västmanland 2014. (Gov. Decision Ju2015/1400/SSK).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D., Tharapos, M., & Sidaway, S. (2014). Downward accountability for a natural disaster recovery effort: Evidence and issues from Australia’s Black Saturday. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(7), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedim, F., Leone, V., & Xanthopoulos, G. (2016). A wildfire risk management concept based on a social-ecological approach in the European Union: Fire Smart Territory. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18, 138–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D.F. (1980). Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. The American Political Science Review, 74(4), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.2307/195431 doi: 10.2307/1954312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I., & Nihlén Fahlquist, J. (2013). Risk and responsibility. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Essentials of risk Theory (pp. 107–143). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2011). Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311408648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimelius, M., & Engberg, J. (2015). Crisis management through network coordination: Experiences of Swedish civil defense directors. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(3), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar