Visual discourse coalitions: visualization and discourse formation in controversies over shale gas development

References

• An, K., & Powe, N. A. (2015). Enhancing ‘boundary work’ through the Use of virtual reality: Exploring the potential within landscape and visual impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 17(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1012757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasson, S. (2018). The bubble that got away? Prospects for shale gas development in South Africa. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (2018). Fracking in a fractured environment: Shale gas mining and institutional dynamics in South Africa’s young democracy. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.09.013
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P. (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 10–34). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R. (2017). In search of thinking space: Reflections on the aesthetic turn in international political theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 45(2), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816684262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R. (2018). Mapping visual global politics. In R. Bleiker (Ed.), Visual global politics (pp. 1–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2017a). Fracking and framing in transatlantic perspective: A comparison of shale politics in the US and European Union. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 15(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2016.1268789
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2017b). Shale we drill? Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 58(2), 7250–7257. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.03728-14
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2000). Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(6), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1068/c9905j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (2007). Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography, 26(4), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy, K. A., & Clancy, B. (2016). Growing monstrous organisms: The construction of anti-GMO visual rhetoric through digital media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1193670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E., Pesch, U., Remmerswaal, S., & Taanman, M. (2016). Normative diversity, conflict and transition: Shale gas in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Wit, M. J. (2011). The great shale debate in the Karoo. South African Journal of Science, 107(7–8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i7/8.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J. (2015). The deliberative potential of civil society organizations: Framing hydraulic fracturing in New York. Policy Studies, 36(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1065967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., & Lee, J. (2017). Framing dynamics and political Gridlock: The curious case of hydraulic fracturing in New York. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., & Metze, T. (2017). Hydraulic fracturing as an interpretive policy problem: Lessons on energy controversies in Europe and the U.S.A. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1277947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr, N. (2017). Bridging language barriers, bonding against immigrants: A visual case study of transnational network publics created by far-right activists in Europe. Discourse and Society, 28(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516676689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr, N., Mattoni, A., & Teune, S. (2015). Visuals in social movements. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of social movements (pp. 557–566). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.48
   Google Scholar
• Domke, D., Perlmutter, D., & Spratt, M. (2002). The primes of our times? Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 3(2), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300211
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339638
   Google Scholar
• Finkeldey, J. (2018). Unconventionally contentious: Frack free South Africa’s challenge to the oil and gas industry. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image Bite politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. E. (2010). The Eyes of the people. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological Modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2013). Editors’ introduction: Researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.785441
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. (2011). Theorizing the image for security studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad cartoon Crisis. European Journal of International Relations, 17(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110388593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., Ercan, S. A., & Duus, S. (2017). A picture worth a thousand words? Visuals in public deliberation.
   Google Scholar
• Hopke, J. E., & Simis, M. (2017). Discourse over a contested technology on Twitter: A case study of hydraulic fracturing. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E. L., Li, N., Akin, H., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Brossard, D. (2017). How do U.S. State residents form opinions about ‘fracking’ in social contexts? A multilevel analysis. Energy Policy, 106(April), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, M., & Atkinson, D. (2015). Can the circle be squared? An enquiry into shale gas mining in South Africa’s Karoo. Development Southern Africa, 32(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2015.1044076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). Heaven and earth: The politics of environmental images. In S. Jasanoff & M. L. Martello (Eds.), Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance (pp. 31–52). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jorritsma, M. (2012). “Don’t Frack with Our Karoo”: water, landscape, and Congregational Song in Kroonvale. Safundi, 13(3–4), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2012.715420
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (2009). The life and Death of democracy. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, A., & Bucy, E. P. (2018). Interpreting images of fracking: How visual frames and Standing attitudes shape Perceptions of environmental risk and economic Benefit. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1412996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Drawing things together. In H. Kuklick (Ed.), Knowledge and society studies in the Sociology of Culture past and Present (27, pp. 95–151). Jai Press. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-2-95-151
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Weibe, P. (2005). Making Things public: Atmospheres of democracy. ZKM Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe and MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., Veneti, A., & Jackson, D. (2019). Introduction: Visual political communication. In A. Veneti, D. Jackson, & D. G. Lilleker (Eds.), Visual political communication (pp. 1–13). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ludes, P., Nöth, W., & Fahlenbrach, K. (2014). Critical visual theory - Introduction. TripleC, 12(1), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i1.559
   Google Scholar
• Marais, C. (2013). Steel flowers – Windpumps of the Karoo. http://karoospace.co.za/steel-flowers-windpumps-of-the-karoo/
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Rogers, R. (2005). Recipe for tracing issues and their publics on the Web. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making Things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 922–935). ZKM Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe and MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A., & Teune, S. (2014). Visions of protest. A media-historic perspective on images in social movements. Sociology Compass, 8(6), 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12173
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2016). How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012? Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514545311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messaris, P., & Abraham, L. (2011). The role of images in framing news stories. In S. D. Reese, O. H. J. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 1–30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2010). Innovation Ltd. Boundary work in deliberative governance in land use planning. Eburon Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2017). Fracking the debate: Frame shifts and boundary work in Dutch decision making on shale Gas. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.941462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2018). Visual framing for policy learning: Internet as the eye of the public. In N. F. Dotti (Ed.), Knowledge, policymaking and learning for European cities and regions (pp. 165–180). Edwar Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2020). Visualization in environmental policy and planning: a systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1798751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T., & Dodge, J. (2016). Dynamic discourse coalitions on hydro-fracking in Europe and the United States. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1133437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. (1999). An introduction to visual culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.29.020178.000335
   Google Scholar
• Morseletto, P. (2017). Analysing the influence of visualisations in global environmental governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 78(August), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.021
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 49, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). A clearer picture: The contribution of visuals and text to framing effects. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–33). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, K., & Wynne, B. (2017). Technoscience, imagined publics and public imaginations. Public Understanding of Science, 26(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516663057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy, politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Walsh, L. (2019). The politics of zoom: Problems with downscaling climate visualizations. Geo: Geography and Environment, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.70
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley‘s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough, J. W., Robinson, S. E., & Vedlitz, A. (2016). Is “fracking” a new dirty word? The influence of word choice on public views toward natural gas attitudes. Energy Research and Social Science, 17, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, A. R., & van Tonder, G. (2015). The Karoo fracking debate: A Christian contribution to the world communities of Faith. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9563-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uggla, Y. (2018). Framing and visualising biodiversity in EU policy. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 15, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2018.1455714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek, L., Metze, T., Kunseler, E., Huitzing, H., de Blois, F., & Wardekker, A. (in press). Environmental visualizations: Framing and reframing between science, policy and society. Environmental Science & Policy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., & Fischer, M. (2016). Policy Debates on hydraulic fracturing: Comparing coalition politics in North America and Europe. In Policy Debates on hydraulic fracturing. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-2-95-151
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2017). Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar