The governance of genome editing techniques for the European bio-based industry

References

• Adenle, A. A., Morris, E. J., Murphy, D. J., Phillips, P. W. B., Trigo, E., Kearns, P., Li, Y.-H., Quemada, H., Falck-Zepeda, J., & Komen, J. (2018). Rationalizing governance of genetically modified products in developing countries. Nature Biotechnology, 36(2), 137–139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, L., Md Jahi, J., & Md Nor, A. R. (2013). Stakeholders’ attitude to genetically modified foods and medicine. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, Article ID 516742, 14pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/516742
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J., Lovell, K., & Harris, N. (2006). How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of ‘expert’ within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher, 14(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartsch, D. (2017). New genome editing ante portas: Precaution meets innovation. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 12(4), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-017-1139-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2001). Biotechnology 1996–2000: The years of controversy. The Science Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer-Panskus, A., Bohn, T., Cotter, J., Hilbeck, A., Millstone, E., Then, C., Wallace, H., Wynne, B. (2020). Summary report of the results from the RAGES project 2016–2019. https://www.testbiotech.org/sites/default/files/Summary%20report%20RAGES_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BioTECH. (2016). Genome editing: Significant for biotechnology. BioTECH Brief. https://www.vci.de/dib/downloads-dib/2016-2-dib-biotech-letter-genome-editing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). (2014). New techniques for genetic crop improvement. Position statement. https://bbsrc.ukri.org/documents/genetic-crop-improvement-position-statement-pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Blind, K., Petersen, S., & Riilo, A. F. (2016). The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.0030048-7333/
   Google Scholar
• Böcher, M., & Töller, A. E. (2012). Eigendynamik und Zufall als Triebkräfte der Umweltpolitik? Ein Ansatz zum Erklären umweltpolitischer Ergebnisse. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 35(4), 450–479.
   Google Scholar
• Böcher, M., & Töller, A. E. (2016, July 1–4). Inherent dynamics and chance as drivers in environmental policy? An approach to explaining environmental policy decisions. Paper presented in the International Conference on Public Policy in Milan 2015.
   Google Scholar
• BÖRMEMO 07. (2018). Genome editing: Europe needs new genetic engineering legislation. Bioökonomierat. https://biooekonomierat.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/berichte/BOER-Memo_Genome-Editing_ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bratlie, S., Halvorsen, K., Myskja, B. K., Mellegård, H., Bjorvatn, C., Frost, P., Heiene, G., Hofmann, B., Holst-Jensen, A., Holst-Larsen, T., Malnes, R. S. E., Paus, B., Sandvig, B., Sjøli, S. I., Skarstein, B., Thorseth, M. B., Vagstad, N., Våge, D. I., & Borge, O. J. (2019). A novel governance framework for GMO. A tiered, more flexible regulation for GMOs would help to stimulate innovation and public debate. EMBO Reports, 20(5), e47812. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201947812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. (2000). Art 3 (g ff). https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/text/
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, J., Kawall, K., & Then, C. (2020). New genetic engineering technologies: Report of the results from the RAGES project 2016–2019. www.testbiotech.org/projekt_rages
   Google Scholar
• Court of Justice of the European Union. (2018). Organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs and are, in principle, subject to the obligations laid down by the GMO Directive. Judgment in Case C-528/16. 25 July 2018. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-07/cp180111en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• D’Adamo, I., Falcone, P. M., & Morone, P. (2020). A New Socio-economic Indicator to Measure the Performance of bioeconomy sectors in Europe. Ecological Economics, 176, 106724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC.
   Google Scholar
• EASAC. (2020). The regulation of genome-edited plants in the European Union. EASAC commentary on the statement by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, the Union of the German Academies of Sciences and Humanities, and the German Research Foundation. https://easac.eu/publications/details/the-regulation-of-genome-edited-plants-in-the-european-union/
   Google Scholar
• Eckerstorfer, M. F., Dolezel, M., Heissenberger, A., Miklau, M., Reichenbecher, W., Steinbrecher, R. A., & Waßmann, F. (2019). An EU perspective on biosafety considerations for plants developed by genome editing and other new genetic modification techniques (nGMs). Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 31. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00031/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, D. (2018). Recovering the original intentions of risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms in the European Union. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 6, 52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, D., Kershen, D., Nepomuceno, A., Pogson, B. J., Prieto, H., Purnhagen, K., Smyth, S., Wesseler, J., & Whelan, A. (2019). A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward. New Phytologist, 222(4), 1673–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, D., Custers, R., Edvardsson Björnberg, K., Hansson, S. O., Purnhagen, K., Qaim, M., Romeis, J., Schiemann, J., Schleissing, S., Tosun, J., & Visser, R. G. F. (2020a). Options to reform the European Union legislation on GMOs: Scope and definitions. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(3), 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, D., Custers, R., Edvardsson Björnberg, K., Hansson, S. O., Purnhagen, K., Qaim, M., Romeis, J., Schiemann, J., Schleissing, S., Tosun, J., & Visser, R. G. F. (2020b). Options to reform the European Union legislation on GMOs: Risk governance. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(4), No. 4 349–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, D., Custers, R., Edvardsson Björnberg, K., Hansson, S. O., Purnhagen, K., Qaim, M., Romeis, J., Schiemann, J., Schleissing, S., Tosun, J., & Visser, R. G. F. (2020c). Options to reform the European Union legislation on GMOs: post-authorization and beyond. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(5), 465–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU SAGE, European Sustainable Agriculture through Genome Editing. (2020). https://www.eu-sage.eu/sites/default/files/2020-07/Open%20Statement%20EU-SAGE%20July%202020_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2018). A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. SWD (2018) 431 final.
   Google Scholar
• Fokum, E., Zabed, H. M., Guo, Q., Yun, J., Yang, M., Pang, H., An, Y., Li, W., & Qi, X. (2019). Metabolic engineering of bacterial strains using CRISPR/Cas9 systems for biosynthesis of value-added products. Food Bioscience, 28, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, S., Takasu, Y., Kearns, P., Dagallier, B., Oshima, R., Schofield, J., & Moreddu, C. (2019). Policy considerations regarding genome editing. Trends in Biotechnology, 37(10), 1029–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Corchero, C., Fischler, C., Hampel, J., Jackson, J., Kronberger, N., Mejlgaard, N., Revuelta, G., & Schreiner, C. (2010). Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change? A Report to the European Commissiońs Directorate General for Research. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_archive/europeansbiotechnology-in-2010_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina. (2019). Towards a scientifically justified, differentiated regulation of genome edited plants in the EU. https://www.leopoldina.org/uploads/tx_leopublication/2019_Stellungnahme_Genomeditierte_Pflanzen_web_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graff, G. D., Hochman, G., & Zilberman, D. (2015). The political economy of regulation of biotechnology in agriculture. In R. J. Herring (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of food, politics, and society. USA: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195397772.013.023.
   Google Scholar
• Habets, M., van Hove, L., & van Est, R. (2019). Genome editing in plants and crops – Towards a modern biotechnology policy focused on differences in risks and broader considerations.
   Google Scholar
• Holme, I. B., Wendt, T., & Holm, P. B. (2013). Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 11(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFOAM. (2015). New plant breeding techniques position paper. https://www.organicseurope.bio/?redirect=1
   Google Scholar
• Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., & Venkataraman, G. (2018). CRISPR for crop Improvement: An update review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Hurlbut, B. (2018). A global observatory for gene editing. Nature, 555(7697), 435–437. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-03270-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorasch, P. (2020). Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation? Plant Cell Reports, 39(1), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-019-02482-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRC. (2015). Delphi Survey. http://forlearn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/guide/4_methodology/meth_delphi.htm
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. Z., Zaidi, S. S., Amin, I., & Mansoor, S. (2019). A CRISPR way for fast-forward crop domestication. Trends in Plant Science, 24(4), 293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladu, L., Clavell, J., Quitzow, R., Costenoble, O., Vrins, M., van den Berg, C., Dammer, L., Partanen, A., Bos, H., van de Oever, M., & Gursel, I. (2019). Deliverable 3.3: Policy paper on strategy for development of an RCS framework. https://www.star4bbi.eu/app/uploads/sites/11/2019/09/D3.3-Sustainability-Certification-for-all-Products_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ladu, L., & Clavell, J. (2018). Deliverable 3.1: Identification of technological trends in selected value chains. STAR4BBI project. Full D3.1 www.biobasedeconomy.eu/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/09/Please-click-here-to-access-deliverable-3.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ladu, L., & Clavell, J. (2019). Deliverable 3.2: Regulatory and Standardization needs in bio-based industries. STAR4BBI project. https://www.biobasedeconomy.eu/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/09/Please-click-here-to-access-deliverable-3.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lassoued, R., Macall, D. M., Smyth, S. J., Phillips, P. W. B., & Hesseln, H. (2020). How should we regulate products of new breeding techniques? Opinion of surveyed experts in plant biotechnology. Biotechnology Reports, 26, e00460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00460
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (2002). The delphi method: Techniques and applications. New Jersey Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Mau, M., & Sharbel, T. F. (2018). Genome editing for global food security. Trends in Biotechnology, 36(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Laffon, J., Kuntz, M., & Ricroch, A. E. (2019). Worldwide CRISPR patent landscape shows strong geographical biases. Nature Biotechnology, 37(6), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0138-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, H., & Bartsch, D. (2020). Regulation of GM organisms for invasive species control. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NatMethods. (2012). Method of the year 2011. Nature Methods, 9(1), 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1852
   Google Scholar
• Pancaldi, F., & Trindade, L. (2020). Marginal lands to grow novel bio-based crops: A plant breeding perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science., 11, Article 227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00227
   Google Scholar
• Poortvliet, M., Purnhagen, K. P., Boersma, R., & Gremmen, B. (2019). On the legal categorisation of new plant breeding technologies: Insights from communication science and ways forward. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 10(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purnhagen, K. P., Kok, E., Kleter, G., Schebesta, H., Visser, R. G. F., & Wesseler, J. (2018a). EU court casts new plant breeding techniques into regulatory limbo. Nature Biotechnology, 36(9), 799–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purnhagen, K. P., Kok, E., Kleter, G., Schebesta, H., Visser, R. G. F., & Wesseler, J. (2018b). The European Union court’s advocate general’s opinion and new plant breeding techniques. Nature Biotechnology, 36(7), 573–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purnhagen, K. (2019). How to manage the union’s diversity: The case on the regulation of new plant breeding technologies Confédération Paysanne and others. Common Market Law Review, 56, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purnhagen, K., & Matthews, A. (2019). European agriculture and the bioeconomy: A historical overview. In L. Dries, W. Heijman, R. Jongeneel, K. Purnhagen, & J. Wesseler (Eds). EU bioeconomy economics and policies: Volume I (pp. 27–35). Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28634-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Qaim, M. (2020). Role of new plant breeding technologies for food security and sustainable agricultural development. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1), 1–19. http://journals.sfu.ca/ipmr/index.php/ipmr/article/view/175
   Google Scholar
• Sagar, A., Daemmrich, A., & Ashiya, M. (2000). The tragedy of the commoners: Biotechnology and its publics. Nature Biotechnology, 18(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/71861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014). CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nature Biotechnology, 32(4), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scientific Advice Mechanisms (SAM). (2016). Scoping paper: New techniques in agricultural biotechnologies. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/groups/sam/hlg_sam_scoping_paper_agribiotechnology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smart, R. D., Blum, M., & Wesseler, J. H. (2015). EU member states’ voting for authorizing genetically engineered crops: A regulatory gridlock. GJAE, 64, 244–262.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmann, P., Londo, M., & Junginger, M. (2020). The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 6, May 2020, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029
   Google Scholar
• Thrän, D., & Urs Moesenfechtel Hrsg. (2020). Das system Bioökonomie. Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60730-5
   Google Scholar
• Torgersen, H., Hampel, J., von Bergmann-Winberg, M.-L., Bridgman, E., Durant, J., Einsiedel, E., Fjaestad, B., Gaskell, G., Grabner, P., Hieber, P., Jelsoe, E., Lassen, J., Marouda-Chatjoulis, A., Hviid Nielsen, T., Rusanen, T., Sakellaris, G., Seifert, F., Smink, C., Twardowski, T., & Kamara, M. (2002). Promise, problems and proxies: Twentyfive years of debate and regulation in Europe. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Biotechnology. The Making of a global controversy (pp. 21–94). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• USDA Foreign Agricultural service. (2017). Dutch proposal to legislate NBTs. Global Agricultural Information Network. https://www.agri-pulse.com/ext/resources/Dutch-Proposal-to-LegislateNBTs_The-Hague_Netherlands-EU-27_9-29-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Von Anna, C., von Cramon, V., Bauer, T., Gehring, K., Fegebank, K., Bayaz, D., Fell, H.-J., Kode, J., Link, A., Kopton, J., Gögge, R., Mackensen, A., Herr, A., Geibel, J., von Wissel, C., Lakner, S., Beyer, T., Schwab, L., Köhn, HC., … Heinze, S. (2020). Neue Zeiten, neue Antworten: Gentechnikrecht zeitgemäß regulieren. https://www.gruene.de/artikel/neue-zeiten-neue-antworten-gentechnikrecht-zeitgemaess-regulieren
   Google Scholar
• Wasmer, M. (2019). Roads forward for European GMO policy—uncertainties in wake of ECJ judgment have to be mitigated by regulatory reform. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseler, J., Jongeneel, R., & Purnhagen, K. (2019a). Bioeconomy economics and policies. In L. Dries, W. Heijman, R. Jongeneel, K. Purnhagen, & J. Wesseler (Eds.), EU bioeconomy economics and policies (Vol. I. Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28634-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Wesseler, J., Politiek, H., & Zilberman, D. (2019b). The economics of regulating new plant breeding technologies – implications for the bioeconomy illustrated by a survey among Dutch plant breeders. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, A. I., Gutti, P., & Lema, M. A. (2020). Gene editing regulation and innovation economics. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, S., Vanderschuren, H., Qaim, M., Mahfouz, M. M., Kohli, A., Mansoor, S., & Tester, M. (2019). New plant breeding technologies for food security. Science, 363(6434), 1390–1391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav6316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsögön, A., Cermak, T., Voytas, D., Peres, L. E. P. (2017). Genome editing as a tool to achieve the crop ideotype and de novo domestication of wild relatives: Case study in tomato. Plant Science, 256, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar