A neo-institutional economic analysis of revising informal and formal proprietary boundaries

References

• Alexander, E. R. (1992). A transaction cost theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, J., Ferreira, J. A., Condessa, B., & Tomé, R. (2018). Improving land readjustment practice. Application of management models to Portugal. European Planning Studies, 26(7), 1431–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1470228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, Å. E., & Andersson, D. E. (2017). Expectations, capital and entrepreneurship. In Time, space and capital (pp. 128–157). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, R. W. (1988). Land pooling for resubdivision and new subdivision in Western Australia. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 47(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1988.tb02029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore, W. (1989). Construction and cosmology: Politics and ideology in Lowland Maya settlement patterns. In W. F. Hanks & D. S. Rice (Eds.), Word and image in Maya culture: Explorations in language, writing, and representation (pp. 272–286). University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bleakley, H., & Ferrie, J. (2014). Land openings on the Georgia Frontier and the Coase theorem in the short and long run. https://www-personal.umich.edu/~hoytb/Bleakley_Ferrie_Farmsize.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bogaerts, T., Williamson, I. P., & Fendel, E. M. (2002). The role of land administration in the accession of Central European countries to the European Union. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00041-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottone, E. M., & Anderson, T. G. (2017). National discourses materialized: Early settlement and land tenure in Perry County, Ohio, 1801–1842. Historical Geography, 45, 152–171.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2004). A transaction-cost analysis of the land development process. Urban Studies, 41(13), 2539–2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000294556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, H. (1983). An introduction to urban historical Geography. Arnold, Edward.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K. W., Choy, L. H. T., & Lai, L. W. C. (2019). A proposed framework of developer obligations to unleash land supply in Hong Kong: Land readjustment. In M.–G. Demetrio & E. van der Krabben (Eds.), Ch. 14, Public infrastructure, private finance: developer obligations and responsibilities, 164–173. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S. N. (1983). The contractual nature of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/467023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, S. N. S. (1982). Will China go ‘capitalist’? An economic analysis of property rights and institutional change. Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Choy, L. H. T., Chau, K. W., & Lai, L. W. C. (2018). Report to task force on land supply – mechanisms to unleash development potentials of privately owned land in the new territories, HKU Ronald Coase Centre for Property Rights Research, September, 2018. Retrieved October 20, 2018, from https://fac.arch.hku.hk/creue/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/TF_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economics, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costonis, J. C. (1973). Development rights transfer: An exploratory essay. The Yale Law Journal, 83(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/795319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlman, C. J. (1980). The open field system and beyond: A property rights analysis of an economic institution. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, J. H. (1928). Reconstruction and development of the Tokyo-Yokohama District. No.69. US Govt. Print. Off.
   Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. C. (2012). The law and economics of street layouts: How a grid pattern benefits a downtown. Alabama Law Review, 64, 463–509.
   Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. C. (2017). A Hayekian case against Anarcho-capitalism: Of street grids, lighthouses, and aid to the destitute. New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 11, 371–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906383
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, S. P. (1995). Prologue to a Study of Roman Urban Form. In Peter Rush (Ed.), Theoretical roman archaeology: Second conference proceedings, vol. 14, Worldwide Archaeology Series, 92-104. Brookfield: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Faure, D. (2007). Emperor and ancestor: State and lineage in South China. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. I., & Silver, C. (2017). Urban planning education: Beginnings, global movement and future prospects. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gozalvo Zamorano, M. J., & Muñoz Gielen, D. (2017). Non-negotiable developer obligations in the Spanish land readjustment: An effective passive governance approach that ‘de facto’ taxes development value? Planning Practice & Research, 32(3), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1374669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwalebaa, M. J., & Chigbu, U. E. (2020). Participation in property formation: Insights from land-use planning in an informal urban settlement in Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104482
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Spit, T. (2015). Dilemmas of involvement in land management – comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach. Land Use Policy, 42, 729–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home, R. (2018). Why land readjustment in the British former colonies, but not in the United Kingdom? In F. F. Souza, T. Ochi, & A. Hosono (Eds.), Ch.3, international experiences of land readjustment (pp. 189–203). Japan International Cooperation Agency Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Izikowitz, K. G. (1951). Lamet: Hill peasants in French Indochina. AMS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kostof, S. (1991). The city shaped: Urban patterns and meanings through history. Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Kucukmehmetoglu, M., & Geymen, A. (2016). Optimization models for urban land readjustment practices in Turkey. Habitat International, 53, 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacovara, P. (1997). The new kingdom royal city. Kegal Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (1994). Property rights analysis of zoning [PhD thesis]. University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (1996). Zoning and property rights. Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (1997). Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoning. Progress in Planning, 3(48), 161–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(97)00010-X
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (2005). Neo-institutional economics and planning theory. Planning Theory, 4(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095205051437
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (2007). ‘The problem of social cost’: The Coase theorem and externality explained: Using simple diagrams and examples to illustrate the role of land use planning in tackling externalities. Town Planning Review, 78(3), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.78.3.5
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (2011). The ideas of Ronald H. Coase: Market failure and planning by contract for sustainable development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (2014). The impact and philosophy of Abercrombie’s plan. In J. Manns (Ed.), Kaleidoscope city: Reflections on planning and London, RTPI London centenary publication (pp. 38–46). RTPI.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., Chau, K. W., Alwin Chan, A., & Choy, L. H. T. (2018). Two dialogues on land readjustment in Hong Kong. Surveying and Built Environment, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., Chau, K. W., & Kwong, J. W. Y. (2012). Surrendering the environment for capital gain and Olson’s group theory: A case study of the dissolution of housing co-operative societies in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 36(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., & Chua, M. H. (2018). Zoning and private property rights in land: Static and dynamic boundary delineation. Habitat International, 75, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., & Davies, S. N. G. (2017). A Coasian boundary inquiry on zoning and property rights: Lot and zone boundaries and transaction costs. Progress in Planning, 118, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., & Davies, S. N. G. (2020). Surveying was a kind of Writing on the land: The economics of land division as town planning. Planning Theory, 118, 421–444.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., Davies, S. N. G., Chan, E. H. W., Chua, M. H., & Lin, C. L. (2020). The production and consumption of land Use planning: A neo-institutional economic perspective & three Taiwan case studies of planning layering. Land Use Policy, 99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., Davies, S. N. G., Chau, K. W., Ching, K. S. T., Chua, M. H., Leung, H. F., & Lorne, F. T. (2018). The determination of the “true” property boundary in planned development: A Coasian analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 61(3), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0871-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., & Hung, C. W. Y. (2008). The inner logic of the Coase theorem and a Coasian planning research Agenda. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., Lorne, F. T., & Davies, S. N. G. (2020). A reflection on the trading of pollution rights via land use exchanges and controls: Coase theorems, Coase’s land use parable, and Schumpeterian innovations. Progress in Planning, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C., Wong, S. K., Ho, E. C. K., & Chau, K. W. (2008). Time is of the essence? An empirical application of the corollary of the Coase theorem. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 20(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2008.00134.x
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W., Chau, K. W., & Cheung, P. A. C. W. (2018b). Urban renewal and redevelopment: Social justice and property rights with reference to Hong Kong’s constitutional capitalism. Cities, 74, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilley, K. D. (2001). Urban planning and the design of towns in the middle ages: The earls of devon and their ‘new towns’. Planning Perspectives, 16(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430010000751
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A., & Sklar, A. (2003). Measuring America: How an untamed wilderness shaped the United States and fulfilled the promise of democracy. Tantor Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lorne, F. T. (2018). Technology and culture: A reflection of the America old west and a projection of the future, or (railroads, Indians, cowboys, and the Chinamen—various observations). Presentation at the Department of Real Estate & Construction, University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Medema, S. G. (1994). The myth of two Coases: What Coase is really saying. Journal of Economic Issues, 28(1), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1994.11505527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minerbi, L., Nakamura, P., Nitz, K., & Yanaied, J. (1986). Land readjustment: The Japanese system: A reconnaissance and a digest. Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
   Google Scholar
• Mirams, A. E. (1919). Town planning in Bombay under Bombay town planning act, 1919. Journal of Town Planning Institute, 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D. (2016). Proposal of land readjustment for the Netherlands: An analysis of its Effectiveness from an International perspective. Cities, 53, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeson, J. M. (1993). Commoners: Common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonfodji, P. (2017). The faces of land grabbing in Benin. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 6(6), 278–306.
   Google Scholar
• Nyambara, P. S. (2000). The politics of land acquisition and struggles over land in the ‘communal’ areas of Zimbabwe: The Gokwe region in the 1980s and 1990s. Africa, 70(1), 253–285. https://doi.org/10.3366/afr.2001.71.2.286
   Google Scholar
• Reps, J. W. (1961). Thomas Jefferson’s checkerboard towns. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 20(3), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/988090
   Google Scholar
• Sandor, R. L., & Walsh, M. J. (2001). Kyoto or not: Opportunities in carbon trading are here. Environmental Quality Management, 10(3), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.1005
   Google Scholar
• Schnidman, F. (1988). Land readjustment. Urban Land, 2, 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, M. M. A. (2012). The potential use of land readjustment as an urban redevelopment strategy in the United States: Assessing net economic value [Master’s thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, S. (1991). Everything you wanted to know about Chinese customary law (but were afraid to ask). Hong Kong Law Journal, 21, 45–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sissoko, F. (2020). Land-use planning implementation uncertainty in Bamako District. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 3(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v3i1.18328
   Google Scholar
• Slaev, A. D. (2016). Types of planning and property rights. Planning Theory, 15(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214540651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, T. R. (1987). Ideal and reality in English episcopal medieval town planning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 12(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/622527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. T. (2003). The political landscape: Constellations of authority in early complex polities. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. E. (2007). Form and meaning in the earliest cities: A new approach to ancient urban planning. Journal of Planning History, 6,(1), 3—47.
   Google Scholar
• Spurr, S. H. (1951). George Washington, surveyor and ecological observer. Ecology, 32(3), 544–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, R., & Heerink, N. (2017). Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China − a comparison. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Krabben, E. (2009). A property rights approach to externality problems: Planning based on compensation rules. Urban Studies, 46(13), 2869–2890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009345537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walthew, C. V. (1978). Property-boundaries and the sizes of building-plots in Roman towns. Britannia (society for the Promotion of Roman Studies), 9, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/525950
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R. S. (1985). Inequality among brothers: Class and kinship in South China. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. J., & Lai, L. W. C. (2003). Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. S.-y. (1990). Chinese customary law-an examination of tsos and family tongs. Hong Kong Law Journal, 20, 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, A., Çağdaş, V., & Demir, H. (2015). An evaluation framework for land readjustment practices. Land Use Policy, 44, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar