Deconstructing the attractiveness of biocluster imaginaries

References

• Amdam, R. P., Lunnan, R., Bjarnar, O., & Halse, L. L. (2020). Keeping up with the neighbors: The role of cluster identity in internationalization. Journal of World Business, 55(5), 101125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6), 340–347. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VT4-4V2J6PS-1/2/fc0e0e2f5a97951a3715627dd93ddb04 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayrapetyan, D., & Hermans, F. (2020). Introducing a multiscalar framework for biocluster research: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 12(9), 3890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, F. (2018). Narratives of biorefinery innovation for the bioeconomy: Conflict, consensus or confusion? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, P. J., Veldkamp, A., Hermans, F., van Apeldoorn, D., Vervoort, J. M., & Kok, K. (2010). Future sustainability and images [special issue: Landscape visions]. Futures, 42(7), 723–732. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328710000649 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.017
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K. (2017). Innovation, regional development and the life sciences; beyond clusters. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BMEL. (2016). Fortschrittsbericht zur Nationalen Politikstrategie Bioökonomie. Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity, applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunori, G. (2013). Biomass, biovalue and sustainability: Some thoughts on the definition of the bioeconomy. EuroChoices, 12(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12020
   Google Scholar
• Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, M., Eaton, W., Selfa, T., Hinrichs, C., & Feldpausch-Parker, A. (2017). The politics of imaginaries and bioenergy sub-niches in the emerging northeast U.S. Bioenergy economy. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 82, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrozza, C. (2015). Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: Different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.914894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daioglou, V., Doelman, J. C., Wicke, B., Faaij, A., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2019). Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 54, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Besi, M., & McCormick, K. (2015). Towards a bioeconomy in Europe: National, regional and industrial strategies. Sustainability, 7(8), 10461–10478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakosavvas, D., & Frezal, C. (2019). Bio-economy and the sustainability of the agriculture and food system. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/d0ad045d-en
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J. J., & Von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10(9), 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1997)
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, W. M., Gasteyer, S. P., & Busch, L. (2014). Bioenergy futures: Framing sociotechnical imaginaries in local places. Rural Sociology, 79(2), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbekink, M., & Lagendijk, A. (2013). What's next in researching cluster policy: Place-based governance for effective cluster policy. European Planning Studies, 21(5), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.734460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2012). Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. (COM (2012) 60). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A., Jakobsen, S.-E., & Bjarnar, O. (2012). The dynamism of clustering: Interweaving material and discursive processes. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 43(5), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). Power. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsche, U, & Rösch, C. (2020) The Conditions of a Sustainable Bioeconomy). In J. Pietzsch (Ed.), Bioeconomy for Beginners (pp. 177–202). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1978). De la science économique `a la bioeconomie. Revue D'économie Politique, 88(3), 337–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1056148
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2019). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 0(0), https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, F. (2018). The potential contribution of transition theory to the analysis of bioclusters and their role in the transition to a bioeconomy. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 12(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, F. (in press). Bioclusters and sustainable development. In S. R. & S. Blasi (Eds.), Rethinking Clusters: Place-based Value Creation in Sustainability Transitions. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff & S.-H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–33). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketels, C., Lindqvist, G., & Sölvell, Ö. (2006). Cluster initiatives in developing and transition economies. Centre for Strategy and Competitiveness.
   Google Scholar
• Ketels, C., Lindqvist, G., & Sölvell, Ö. (2012). Strengthening clusters and competitiveness in Europe: The role of cluster organisations. Retrieved from Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T., Kuosmanen, N., El-Meligi, A., Ronzon, T., Gurria, P., Iost, S., & M'Barek, R. (2020). How big is the bioeconomy? Reflections from an economic perspective (EUR 30167 EN). Retrieved from Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., Birch, K., & Papaioannou, T. (2013). Divergent paradigms of European agro-food innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(1), 94–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912438143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2013). State imaginaries of the public good: Shaping UK innovation priorities for bioenergy. Environmental Science & Policy, 30, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, I. (2018). Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, Biobased economy. University of Hohenheim & Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, S. M., & Stephens, J. C. (2012). Green energy clusters and socio-technical transitions: Analysis of a sustainable energy cluster for regional economic development in central Massachusetts, USA. Sustainability Science, 2012(7), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0164-6
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013). The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5(6), 2589–2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q-Methodology (Vol. 07-066). Sage University Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., Jakobsen, S.-E., Wiig Aslesen, H., & Fløysand, A. (2017). Encounters between cluster theory, policy and practice in Norway: Hubbing, blending and conceptual stretching. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416655860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R, Sjøtun, S G, Jakobsen, S E, & Fløysand, A. (2020). Expanding Analyses of Path Creation: Interconnections between Territory and Technology. Economic Geography, 96(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). The bioeconomy in 2030: Designing a policy agenda. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Aleman, P. (2005). CLUSTER formation, institutions and learning: The emergence of clusters and development in Chile. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(4), 651–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, S. F., Hagens, J. E., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. J. M. (2014). Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability, 6(3), 1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S, Carus, M, & Essel, R. (2016). Sustainable biomass supply and demand: a scenario analysis. Open Agriculture, 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2016-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review, 68(2), 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M E. (1998). On Competition. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruneddu, A. (2017) ). QSortWare [Computer software]. www. qsortware. net.
   Google Scholar
• Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülzl, H. (2018). Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4170–4180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RDI2CluB. (2018). Benchmarking report: Triple-helix co-operation in biobased delta: RDI2CluB consortium benchmarking visit to biobased delta bioeconomy cluster in the Netherlands, April 18.–20.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, C., Yamin, M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2012). Policy-driven clusters, interfirm interactions and firm internationalisation: Some insights from Malaysia's multimedia super corridor. International Business Review, 21(5), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland (RVO). (2015). Onderzoeksagenda Biobased Economy 2015 - 2027. ‘B4B: biobased voor bedrijven, burgers en beleid'. Retrieved from The Netherlands. https://chemistrynl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Onderzoeksagenda-BBE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, O., Padel, S., & Levidow, L. (2012). The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 1(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.125698
   Google Scholar
• Schmolck, P. (2014). PQMethod (Version 2.35). http://www.rz.unibw-muenchen.de/~p41bsmk/qmethod/
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018). Social life cycle assessment: In pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(3), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøtun, S. G., & Njøs, R. (2019). Green reorientation of clusters and the role of policy: ‘The normative’ and ‘the neutral’ route. European Planning Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1630370
   Google Scholar
• Sölvell, Ö. (2008). Clusters: Balancing evolutionary and constructive forces. Ivory Tower Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, P., Londo, M., & Junginger, M. (2020). The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 6, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029
   Google Scholar
• Susur, E., Hidalgo, A., & Chiaroni, D. (2019). A strategic niche management perspective on transitions to eco-industrial park development: A systematic review of case studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014). The power of stories. In R. Beunen, K. Van Assche, & M. Duineveld (Eds.), Evolutionary governance theory (pp. 45–54). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vivien, F. D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala, A. (2014). Qmethod: A package to analyse human perspectives using Q methodology. The R Journal, 6(2), 163–173. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2014-2/zabala.pdf https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-032
   Google Scholar