References
- Aguilar, A., Magnien, E., & Thomas, D. (2013). Thirty years of European biotechnology programmes: From biomolecular engineering to the bioeconomy. New Biotechnology, 30(5), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.11.014
- Alessandrini, D. (2010). GMOs and the crisis of objectivity: Nature, science and the challenge of uncertainty. Social and Legal Studies, 19(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909346195
- Alexander, M., & Bracewell-Worrall, A. (2019). Government blocking breakthrough technology that could make New Zealand predator-free. Newshub. www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2019/02/govt-blocking-breakthrough-technology-that-could-make-new-zealand-predator-free.html
- Ayres, R. U. (1994). Industrial metabolism; theory and policy. In B. R. Allenby, & D. J. Richards (Eds.), The greening of industrial ecosystems (pp. 23–37). National Academy Press.
- Balke, V., Evans, S., Rabbiosi, L., & Averous Monnery, S. (2017). “Promoting circular economies.” T. Altenburg & C. Assmann (Eds.), Green industrial policy. Concept, policies, country experiences (pp. 120–133). UN Environment; German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitk (DIE).
- Bawa, A. S., & Anilakumar, K. R. (2013). Genetically modified foods: Safety, risks and public concerns. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50(6), 1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0899-1
- Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. http://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
- Bodiguel, L., & Cardwell, M. (Eds.). (2010). The regulation of GMOs: Comparative approaches. Oxford University Press.
- Buchmann-Duck, J., & K. F., Beazley. (2020). An urgent call for circular economy advocates to acknowledge its limitations in conserving biodiversity. Science of the Total Environment, 727.138602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138602
- Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What Is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(691), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691.
- Cabinet of New Zealand. (2018). The one billion trees programme: Actions and decisions for implementation. CAB-18-MIN-0379.01. Wellington.
- Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., & Nilstad-Pettersen, I. (2018). Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082758
- Carlson, R. (2016). Estimating the biotech sector’s contribution to the US economy. Nature Biotechnology, 34(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3491
- Ceapraz, I. C., Kotbi, G., & Sauvee, L. (2016). The territorial the biorefinery as a new business model. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 5(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.13128/BAE-15379
- Clarke, J. L., & Zhang, P. (2013). Plant biotechnology for food security and bioeconomy. Plant Molecuar Biology, 83(1-2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-013-0097-1
- Colmorgen, F., Khawaja, C., & Rutz, D. (2020). Handbook on regional and local bio-based economies. WIP Renewable Energies.
- Deavoll, P. (2018). Is it time to reopen the genetic modification debate. Stuff. Retrieved 25 February 2020, from, www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/108702779/is-it-time-to-reopen-the-genetic-modification-debate
- de Pauw, I., Karana, E., & Kandachar, P. (2013). Cradle-to-cradle in product development: A case-study of closed-loop design. In Nee et al. (Ed.), Re-engineering manufacturing for sustainability (pp. 47–52). Springer.
- Diary NZ. (2019). Submission to MBIE on proposed research, science and innovation strategy.
- EC. (2015). Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the circular economy. The European Commission.
- EC. (2018a). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment: Updated bioeconomy strategy. The European Commission.
- EC. (2018b). Impacts of circular economy policies on the labour market. The European Commission.
- EEA [European Environment Agency]. (2016). Circular economy in Europe: Developing the knowledge base. EEA Report No 2/2016. Brussels.
- EMAF [Ellen MacArthur Foundation], Stiftungsfonds für Umweltökonomie und Nachhaltigkeit (SUN) of the Deutsche Post Foundation, and the McKinsey Center for Business and Environment. (2015). “Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe”. Retrieved 17 March 2020, from, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/EllenMacArthurFoundation_Growth-Within_July15.pdf
- Ezezika, O. C., & Singer, P. A. (2010). Genetically engineered oil-eating microbes for bioremediation: Prospects and regulatory challenges. Technology in Society, 32(4), 331–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.010
- Fagan, J., Antoniou, M., & Robinson, C. (2014). GMO myths and truths. Earth Open Source UK.
- FOA [Forest Owners Association]. (2019a). Submission to Draft Strategy on Science, Research and Innovation. Wellington.
- FOA [Forest Owners Association]. (2019b). Position statement: gene editing technology in the forest growing sector. https://www.nzfoa.org.nz/resources/file-libraries-resources/discussion-papers/708-foa-position-paper-gmo/file
- FORMAS. (2012). Swedish research and innovation strategy for a bio-based economy. The Government of Sweden.
- Fox, J. F. (1997). Farmers say Monsanto’s engineered cotton drops bolls. Nature Biotechnology, 15(12), 1233. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1197-1233a
- Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Clean Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
- Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1986). The entropy law and the economic process in retrospect. Eastern Economic Journal, 12(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/40357380
- Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
- Giampietro, M. (2019). On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: Implications for sustainable growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001
- Grammar, Z. L. (2017). New Zealanders say ‘NO’ to genetically engineered trees. Nov 6, 2017 GE Free NZ https://stopgetrees.org/kiwis-say-no-ge-trees-new-national-environmental-standards-plantation-forestry/
- Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press.
- Hillbeck, A., Binimelis, R., Defarge, N., Steinbrecher, R., Székács, A., Wickson, F., Antoniou, M., Bereano, P. L., Clark, E. A., Hansen, M., & Novotny, E. (2015). No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environmental Sciences Europe, 27(4), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000101165
- Hobson, K., & Lynch, N. (2016). Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world. Futures, 82, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012
- Huang, K. (2017). Safety assessment of genetically modified foods. Springer nature.
- IRP [International Resource Panel]. (2017). Assessing global resource use: A systems approach to resource efficiency and pollution reduction. UNEP.
- Katz, D. (2001). The mismatch between the biosafety protocol and of the precautionary principle. Geographical International Environmental Law Review, 13(4), 949–982.
- Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resource Conservation Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
- Knot, M., & Luiten, H. (2006). User involvement in the development of sustainable product-service systems. In V. Peter-Paul & S. Adriaan (Eds.), User behaviour and technology development (pp. 263–276). Springer.
- Lazarevic, D., & Valve, H. (2017). Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition. Energy Research and Social Science, 31, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006
- Lewis, G. (2019). How the new circular bioeconomy could deal with the problem of plastic. Listener October 23, 2019. https://www.noted.co.nz/planet/planet-planet/plastic-how-new-circular-bioeconomy-could-deal-with-problem
- MBIE. (2019a). Responsibly delivering value: A minerals and petroleum resource strategy for aotearoa New Zealand 2019–2029. The Government of New Zealand.
- MBIE. (2019b). Vision for hydrogen (Green paper towards a national strategy). The Government of New Zealand.
- MBIE. (2020). Regulatory framework for decommissioning petroleum infrastructure and enforcement. The Government of New Zealand.
- McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013). The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5(6), 2589–2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
- McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle-to-cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
- McGloughlin, M. (1998). Ten reasons why biotechnology will be important to the developing world. AgBio Forum, 12(3&4), 163–174.
- McGuiness Institute. (2013). An overview of genetic modification in New Zealand 1973–2013: The first forty years. The McGuiness Institute. Wellington.
- McIntyre, B. D., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., & Watson, R. T. (Eds). (2009). International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (Synthesis, Global and Regional Reports). Island Press.
- MFE [Ministry for Environment]. (2019). Update on resource efficiency and circular economy work programme. The Government of New Zealand.
- Milardo, R. M. (2015). Crafting scholarship in the behavioral and social sciences: Writing, reviewing, and editing. Routledge.
- Morgan, J., & Mitchell, P. (2015). Employment and the circular economy Job creation in a more resource efficient britain. Green Alliance. Retrieved 22 May 2020, from, http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Employment%20and%20the%20circular%20economy%20summary.pdf
- MPI. (2019). Aquaculture strategy. The Government of New Zealand.
- MPI. (2020a). Fit for a better world: Background analyses of export earnings in the primary sector. The Government of New Zealand.
- MPI. (2020b). Fit for a better world: Accelerating our economic potential. The Government of New Zealand.
- MPI [Ministry for Primary industries]. (2017). Primary sector science roadmap te Ao Tūroa Strengthening New Zealand's bioeconomy for future generations. The Government of New Zealand.
- Mugge, R. (2017). A consumer’s perspective on the circular economy. In J. Chapman (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sustainable product design (pp. 374–390). Routledge.
- NASEM [National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine]. (2019). Forest health and biotechnology: Possibilities and considerations. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
- New Zealand Government. (2019). Economic Plan for a productive, sustainable and inclusive economy. The New Zealand Government.
- NZBIO. (2009). Biotechnology industry growth report to ministry of science, research, technology. Retrieved 20 January 2020, from https://docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/NZBIOSummitReport.pdf
- OECD. (2009). The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-en
- OECD. (2020). Labour market consequences of a transition to a circular economy: A review paper. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 162, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e57a300a-en
- Office of the Associate Minister for the Environment. (2018). Improving waste management supporting New Zealand’s transition to a circular economy. 12 July 2018. The New Zealand Government.
- Office of the Forestry Minister. (2019). Preparing the forest system for the future. The New Zealand Government.
- Parker, D. (2018, March 28). Economic growth within environmental limits [Press release]. Retrieved 16 October 2019, from, https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/economic-growth-within-environmental-limits
- Pfau, S., Hagens, J., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. (2014). Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability, 6(3), 1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031222
- Philp, J., & Winickoff, D. E. (2017). Clusters in industrial biotechnology and bioeconomy: The roles of the public sector. Trends in Biotechnology, 35(8), 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.004
- Plant and Food Research. (2015). Statement of corporate intent 2015/2016. Retrieved 11 January 2020, from, https://www.plantandfood.co.nz/page/about-us/publications/
- Plant and Food Research. (2020a). Our views on genetic modification. Retrieved 2 October 2020, from, https://www.plantandfood.co.nz/page/about-us/our-views-on-gm/
- Plant and Food Research. (2020b). Statement of corporate intent 2020/2021. Retrieved 11 January 2020, from, https://www.plantandfood.co.nz/page/about-us/publications/
- Productivity Commission. (2018). The low-emissions economy. Retrieved 11 January 2020, from, www.productivity.govt.nz/low-emissions
- Raffensperger, C., Schettler, T., & Myers, N. (2000). Precaution: Belief, regulatory system, and overarching principle. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 6(4), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2000.6.4.266
- RCGM [Royal Commission on Genetic Modification]. (2001). Report of the royal commission on genetic modification: Report and recommendations to Government. The New Zealand Government.
- Richardson, M. (Ed.). (2009). Bioenergy options for New Zealand. Analysis of large-scale bioenergy from forestry. Scion Energy Project.
- RNZ [Radio New Zealand]. (2015). EPA defends appointment of new chief executive. Retrieved 30 March 2020, from, https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/rural/280078/epa-defends-appointment-of-new-chief-executive
- Royal Society Te Apārangi. (2019). Rethinking plastics in Aotearoa New Zealand. Retrieved 1 August 2020, from, https://www.wasteminz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Rethinking-Plastics-in-Aotearoa-New-Zealand_Key-Messages_8-Dec-2019-PDF.pdf
- Sabatier, P. A. (1998). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2/3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051
- Scion. (2016). Annual report. Retrieved 3 June 2020, from, https://www.scionresearch.com/about-us/about-scion/corporate-publications/annual-reports/2016-annual-report
- Scion. (2018). The New Zealand biofuels roadmap. Retrieved 3 June 2020, from, https://www.scionresearch.com/science/bioenergy/nz-biofuels-roadmap.
- Scion. (2019). Scion connections issue 34, December 2019. Retrieved 3 June 2020, from, https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/68304/Scion-Connections-Issue34.pdf
- Scion. (2020). Annual report. Retrieved 3 June 2020, from, https://www.scionresearch.com/about-us/about-scion/corporate-publications/annual-reports/2020-annual-report/scion-annual-report-2020
- Scion, Landcare Research, AgResearch, Plant and Food Research, University of Canterbury. (2020). One Billion Trees: Current state of New Zealand Forestry Science MPI Technical Paper 2020/01 Prepared for the Ministry for Primary Industries.
- Slade, G. (2007). Made to break: Technology and obsolescence in America. Harvard University Press.
- Smolker, R. (2008). The new bioeconomy and the future of agriculture. Development, 51(4), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2008.67
- Stahel, W. R. (2010). The performance economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Sustainable Business Network. (2018). New Zealand’s plastic packaging system: An initial circular economy diagnosis. Retrieved 23 May 2020, from https://www.circulareconomy.org.nz/developing-a-circular-economy-for-plastics-in-nz
- Tauton, E. (2017). US testing begins on genetically modified ryegrass developed in NZ. Stuff (Media). Accesses 11/02/2020 at https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/93008490/us-testing-begins-on-genetically-modified-ryegrass-developed-in-nz
- Thayyil, N. (2014). Biotechnology regulation and GMOs law, technology and public contestations in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- TP Organics [European Technology Platform for Organic Food and Farming Research. (2014). Strategic research and innovation agenda for organic food and farming.
- USA. (2012). National bioeconomy blueprint. Industrial Biotechnology, 8, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2012.1524
- Velenturf, A. P. M., Archer, S. A., Gomes, H. I., Christgen, B., Lag-Brotons, A. J., & Purnell, P. (2019). Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Science of the Total Environment, 689, 963–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.449
- Vita, G., Lundströmb, J. R., Hertwichc, E. G., Quistd, J., Ivanovaa, D., Stadlera, K., & Wooda, R. (2019). The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in Europe: Connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences. Ecological Economics, 164, 106322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002
- Vivien, F. D., Nieddu, M., Befortc, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
- Von Braun, J. (2014). Bioeconomy and sustainable development – dimensions. Rural, 21(2), 6–9.
- Wojtach, A. (2016). Ecosystem services in the circular economy. Environmental Policy and Management, 4(59), 99–108.
- Wolfenbarger, L. L., & Phifer, P. R. (2000). The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science, 290(5499), 2088–2093. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5499.2088
- World Bank. (2018). Which country produces most wastes? Retrieved 2 October 2020, from, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ll5f1wPrP4UgPtnvM1eoElMZMVgF4v3ShS5Od-aaHI0/edit#gid=0
- Wright, J., & Kurian, P. (2010). Ecological modernization versus sustainable development: the case of genetic modification regulation in New Zealand. Sustainable Development, 18(6), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.430
- Zilberman, D., Kim, E., Kirschner, S., Kaplan, S., & Reeves, J. (2013). Technology and the future bioeconomy. Agricultural Economics, 44(s1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12054
- Zwillich, T. (2000). A tentative comeback for bioremediation. Science, 289(5488), 2266–2267. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5488.2266