3,197
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Urban governance and policy mixes for nature-based solutions and integrated water policy

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 498-512 | Received 17 Dec 2020, Accepted 08 Jul 2021, Published online: 26 Jul 2021

References

  • Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of deja vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(1), 1–12.
  • Albert, C., Schroter, B., Hasse, D., Brillinger, M., Henze, J., Herrmann, J., Gottwald, S., Guerrero, P., Nicolas, C., & Matzdorf, B. (2019). Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landscape and Urban Planning, 182, 12–21.
  • Almensar, J. B., Eliott, T., Rugani, B., Phillipe, B., Gutierrez, T. N., Sonnerman, G., & Geneletti, D. (2021). Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges. Land Use Policy, 100, 104898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898
  • Baravikova, A. (2020). The uptake of new concepts in urban greening: Insights from Poland. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 56, 126798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126798
  • Baulenas, E., & Sotirov, M. (2020). Cross-sectoral policy integration at the forest and water nexus: National level instrument choices and integration drivers in the European Union. Forest Policy and Economics, 118(C), 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102247
  • Bennett, G., Cassin, J., & Carroll, N. (2016). Natural infrastructure investment and implications for the nexus: A global overview. Ecosystem Services, 17, 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.006
  • Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283
  • Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
  • Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747
  • Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
  • Bush, J. (2020). The role of local government greening policies in the transition towards nature-based cities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.015
  • Camps-Calvet, M., Langemeyer, J., Calvet-Mir, L., & Gomez-Baggethun, E. (2015). Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 14–23.
  • Connop, S., Vandergert, P., Eisenberg, B., Collier, M. J., Nash, C., Clough, J., & Newport, D. (2016). Renaturing cities using a regionally-focused biodiversity-led multifunctional benefits approach to urban green infrastructure. Environmental Science & Policy, 62(C), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.013
  • Davis, M., & Naumann, S. (2017). Making the case for sustainable urban drainage systems as a nature-based solution to urban flooding. In N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 123–127). Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
  • Dorst, H., van der Jagt, A., Raven, R., & Runhaar, H. (2019). Urban greening through nature-based solutions – Key characteristics of an emerging concept. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620
  • Droste, N., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Hansjürgens, B., & Zimmermann, H. (2017). Implementing nature-based solutions in urban areas: Financing and governance aspects. In N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 307–321). Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
  • Dunn, G., Brown, R. R., Bos, J. J., & Bakker, K. (2017). The role of science-policy interface in sustainable urban water transitions: Lessons from Rotterdam. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.013
  • Duskova, D., & Haas, D. (2020). Not simply green: Nature-based solutions as a concept and practical approach for sustainability studies and planning agendas in cities. Land, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9010019
  • Fish, R. D., Ioriss, A. A. R., & Watson, N. M. (2010). Integrating water and agricultural management: Collaborative governance for a complex policy problem. Science of the Total Environment, 408(23), 5623–5630.
  • Frantzeskaki, N., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Egermann, M., & Ehner, F. (2017). Nature-based solutions accelerating urban sustainability transitions in cities: Lessons from Dresden, Genk and Stockholm cities. In N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 65–88). Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
  • Frantzeskaki, N., Vandergert, P., Connop, S., Schipper, K., Zwierzchowska, I., Collier, M., & Lodder, M. (2020). Examining the policy needs for implementing nature-based solutions in cities: Findings from city-wide transdisciplinary experiences in Glasgow (UK), Genk (Belgium) and Poznań (Poland). Land Use Policy, 96, 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104688
  • Gulick, L. (1983). The dynamics of public administration today as guidelines for the future. Public Administration Review, 43(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/976327
  • Halbe, J., Knüppe, K., Knieper, C., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2018). Towards an integrated flood management approach to address trade-offs between ecosystem services: Insights from the Dutch and German Rhine, Hungarian Tisza, and Chinese Yangtze basins. Journal of Hydrology, 559, 984–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.001
  • Hemmingway, P., & Bereton, N. (2009). What is a systematic review? Evidence based medicine series. http://www.bandolier.org.uk/painres/download/whatis/Syst-review.pdf
  • Howlett, M. (1991). Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation. National approaches to theories of instrument choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1991.tb01878.x
  • Howlett, M. P., & Cuenca, J. S. (2016). The use of indicators in environmental policy appraisal: Lessons from the design and evolution of water security policy measures. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(2), 229–243.
  • Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2
  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature. (2020). Commission on ecosystem management: nature based solutions. www.iucn.org/commissions/commission-ecosystem-management
  • Jensen, A., Nielsen, H. Ø., & Russel, D. (2020). Climate policy in a fragmented world—Transformative governance interactions at multiple levels. Sustainability, 12(23), 10017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310017
  • Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. R. (2013). Still the century of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments? Exploring patterns of innovation and continuity. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755839
  • Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., Haase, D., Knapp, S., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Zaunberger, K., & Bonn, A. (2017). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. In N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 1–11). Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
  • Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Klejjnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680309600304
  • Krause, K., & Wagner, I. (2019). From classical water-ecosystem theories to nature-based solutions — Contextualizing nature-based solutions for sustainable city. Science of the Total Environment, 655(10), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.187
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/976178
  • Liquete, C., Udias, A., Conte, G., Grizzetti, B., & Masi, F. (2016). Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosystem Services, 22(B), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011
  • Malterud, K., Bjelland, A. K., & Elvbakken, K. T. (2018). Systematic reviews for policy-making – critical reflections are needed. Health Research Policy & Systems, 16, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0387-9
  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1994). Institutional perspectives on governance. ARENA Working Paper 94/2. Oslo.
  • McVittie, A., Cole, L. J., Wreford, A., Sgobbi, A., & Yordi, B. (2018). Ecosystem-based solutions for disaster risk reduction: Lessons from European applications of ecosystem-based adaptation measures. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 32, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.014
  • Nesshover, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., Haase, D., Jones–Walters, L., Keune, H., Kovacs, E., Krauze, K., Kulvik, M., Rey, F., van Dijk, J., Vistad, O. I., Wilkinson, M. E., & Wittmer, H. (2017). The science, policy and practice of nature–based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
  • Olsen, J. P. (2001). Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 95(01), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000120
  • Pagano, A., Pluchinotta, I., Pengal, P., Cokan, B., & Giordano, R. (2019). Engaging stakeholders in the assessment of NBS effectiveness in flood risk reduction: A participatory system dynamics model for benefits and co-benefits evaluation. Science of the Total Environment, 690, 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.059
  • Pakizer, K., Fischer, M., & Lieberherr, E. (2020). Policy instrument mixes for operating modular technology within hybrid water systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 105, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.009
  • Papparlardo, V., & La Rosa, D. (2020). Policies for sustainable drainage systems in urban contexts within performance-based planning approaches. Sustainable Cities and Societies, 52, 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101830
  • Pasimeni, M. R., Valente, D., Zurlini, G., & Petrosillo, I. (2019). The interplay between urban mitigation and adaptation strategies to face climate change in two European countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 95, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.02.002
  • Pauleit, S., Zölch, T., Hansen, R., Randrup, T. B., & van der Bosch, C. K. (2017). Nature-based solutions and climate change – Four shades of green. In N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 29–49). Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
  • Pedersen, A. B., Nielsen, H. O., & Daugbjerg, C. (2020). Environmental policy mixes and target group heterogeneity: Analysing Danish farmers’ responses to the pesticide taxes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 608–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1806047
  • Perz, S. G., Brilhante, S., Brown, F., Chavez Michaelsen, A., Mendoza, E., Passos, V., Pinedo, R., Fernando Reyes, J., Rojas, D., & Selaya, G. (2010). Crossing boundaries for environmental science and management: Combining interdisciplinary, interorganizational and international collaboration. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000810
  • Pierre, J., & Peters, G. (2012). The politics of bureaucracy. Routledge.
  • Raymond, C. M., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., Kabisch, N., de Bel, M., Enzi, V., Frantzeskaki, N., Geneletti, G., Lovinger, L., Cardinaletti, M., Basnou, C., Monteiro, A., Robrecht, H., Sgrigna, G., Muhari, L., Calfapietra, C., & Berry, P. (2017a). An impact evaluation framework to support planning and evaluation of nature-based solutions projects. Report prepared by the EKLIPSE Expert Working Group on Nature-based Solutions to Promote Climate Resilience in Urban Areas. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.
  • Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., Geneletti, D., & Calfapietra, C. (2017b). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
  • Rolf, W., Diehl, K., Zasada, I., & Wiggering, H. (2020). Integrating farmland in urban Green infrastructure planning. An evidence synthesis for informed policymaking. Land Use Policy, 99, 104823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104823
  • Russel, D., Castellari, S., Capriolo, A., Dessai, S., Hildén, M., Jensen, E., Karali, E., Mäkinen, K., Ørsted Nielsen, H., Weiland, S., den Uyl, R., & Tröltzsch, J. (2020). Policy coordination for national climate change adaptation in Europe: All process, but little power. Sustainability, 12(13), 5393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135393
  • Russel, D., Turnpenny, J., & Jordan, A. (2018). Mainstreaming the environment through appraisal: Integrative governance or logics of disintegration? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(8), 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418767656
  • Sarabi, S., Han, Q. L., Romme, A. G., de Vries, B., & Wendling, L. (2019). Key enablers of and barriers to the uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions in urban settings: A review. Resources, 8(3), 121.
  • Schaub, S., Vogeler, C., Jale Tosun, J., & Metz, F. (2021). Policy-mix designs for enabling water policy integration. Journal of Environmental Planning & Policy, (forthcoming).
  • Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2019). Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes – An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Research Policy, 48(10), 103557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.012
  • Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020). Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1794), 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
  • Suleiman, L., Olofsson, B., Sauri, D., & Palau-Rof, L. (2020). A breakthrough in urban rain-harvesting schemes through planning for urban greening: Case studies from Stockholm and Barcelona. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 51, 126678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126678
  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organisational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage.
  • Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
  • Usman, L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of Canadian Academic Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), 57–55.
  • van der Jagt, A. P. N., Szaraz, L. R., Delshammar, T., Cvejić, R., Santos, A., Goodness, J., & Buijs, A. (2017). Cultivating nature-based solutions: The governance of communal urban gardens in the European Union. Environmental Research, 159, 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.013
  • Wiemer, D. L. (2020). When are nudges desirable? Benefit validity when preferences are not consistently revealed. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 118–126.
  • Wilczynski, S. (2017). Systematic review. In: Wilczynski, S. M. (Ed.). A practical guide to finding treatments that work for people with autism. www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/systematic-review
  • Xie, K., Di Tosto, G., Chen, S.-B., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2018). A systematic review of design and technology components of educational digital resources. Computers & Education, 127, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.011
  • Zwierzchowska, I., Fagiewicz, K., Poniży, L., Lupa, P., & Mizgajski, A. (2019). Introducing nature-based solutions into urban policy – facts and gaps. Case study of Poznań. Land Use Policy, 85, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.025