References
- 88th Congress, Second Session, United States of America. (1964). Wilderness Act, Publice Law 88-577 (16 U.S.C. 1131-1136). https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1981/upload/W-Act_508.pdf
- Arias-Maldonado, M. (2015). Environment and society: Socionatural relations in the anthropocene. Springer.
- Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourse, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6), 340–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004
- Biermann, F., Bai, X., Bondre, N., Broadgate, W., Chen, C. T. A., Dube, O. P., Erisman, J. W., Glaser, M., van der Hel, S., Lemos, M. C., Seitzinger, S., & Seto, K. (2016). Down to earth: Contextualizing the anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 39, 341–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.004
- Burke, A., Fishel, S., Mitchell, A., Dalby, S., & Levine, D. J. (2016). Planet politics: A manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 499–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816636674
- Caro, T., Darwin, J., Forrester, T., Ledoux-Bloom, C., & Wells, C. (2011). Conservation in the anthropocene. Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth, 26(1), 109–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01752.x
- Connolly, W. E. (2017). Facing the planetary: Entangled humanism and the politics of swarming. Duke University Press.
- Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford University Press.
- Fiske, D. (2018, November). Sociocosmic Implications in the Anthropocene [Paper presentation]. Earth System Governance: Governing global sustainability in a complex world, Utrecht, the Netherlands. http://www.earthsystemgovernance.net/utrecht2018/wp-content/uploads/Fiske_ESG2018.pdf
- Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). Duke University Press.
- Hajer, M. A., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
- Happaerts, S., & Bruyninckx, H. (2014). Sustainable development: The institutionalization of a contested policy concept. In M. M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler, & D. Stevis (Eds.), Advances in international environmental politics (2nd ed., pp. 300–327). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ishwaran, N., Persic, A., & Tri, N. H. (2008). Concept and practice: The case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2008.018358
- Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., & Vasileiadou, E. (2015). Who speaks for the future of earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 32, 211–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012
- Rickards, L. A. (2015). Metaphor and the anthropocene: Presenting humans as a geological force. Geographical Research, 53(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12128
- Rocky Mountain National Park. (2013). Foundation document: Rocky mountain national park. U.S. National Park Service, Department of Interior. https://www.nps.gov/romo/learn/management/upload/ROMO_Foundation_Document.pdf
- Rolston III, H. (2015). After preservation? Dynamic nature in the anthropocene. In B. A. Minteer & S. J. Pyne (Eds.), After preservation: Saving American nature in the age of humans (pp. 32–40). The University of Chicago Press. https://hdl.handle.net/10217/89528
- Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discourse-institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
- Simon, Z. B. (2017). Why the anthropocene has no history: Facing the unprecedented. Anthropocene Review, 4(3), 239–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019617742170
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1972). Records of the general conference, sixteenth session: Volume I: Resolutions. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000161042?posInSet=1&queryId=9180ee95-a091-463c-9d01-f3309db8971e
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1984). Action plan for biosphere reserves. Man and the biosphere programme. Nature and Resources, UNESCO. https://npshistory.com/publications/mab/OPN_BR_21.pdf
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1996). Man and the biosphere programme. Biosphere reserves: The Seville strategy and the statutory framework of the world network. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000103849
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2008). Madrid action plan for biosphere reserves (2008–2013). Man and the biosphere programme. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000163301_eng
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2011). Declaration on biosphere reserves and climate change. Man and the biosphere programme. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/DRESDEN_DECLARATION_MAB.pdf
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2017). A new road map for the man and the biosphere (MAB) programme and its world network of biosphere reserves: MAB strategy (2015–2025), lima action plan (2016–2025), lima declaration. man and the biosphere programme. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247418_eng
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2018). Welcome to the anthropocene! The UNESCO Courier, April–June 2018 Issue. https://en.unesco.org/courier/2018-2
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2021). Man and the biosphere programme. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from https://en.unesco.org/mab
- Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Fairchild, I. J., Rose, N. L., Loader, N. J., Shotyk, W., Cearreta, A., Head, M. J., Syvitski, J. P. M., Williams, M., Wagreich, M., Barnosky, A. D., Zhisheng, A., Leinfelder, R., Jeandel, C., Gałuszka, A., Ivar do Sul, J. A., Gardstein, F., … Edgeworth, M. (2018). Global boundary stratotype section and point (GSSP) for the anthropocene series: Where and how to look for potential candidates. Earth-Science Reviews, 178(March), 379–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.016
- World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.