The role of niche and regime intermediaries in building partnerships for urban transitions towards sustainability

References

• Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409044
   Google Scholar
• Berkvist, A.-K., & Söderholm, K. (2011). Green innovation systems in Swedish industry, 1960–1989. Business History Review, 85(04), 677–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680511001152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., & Guy, S. (2009). Governing through translations: Intermediaries and the mediation of the EU’s urban waste water directive. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080902891244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgström, S., Zachrisson, A., & Eckerberg, K. (2016). Funding ecological restoration policy in practice – Patterns of short-termism and regional biases. Land Use Policy, 52, 439–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. H. W. (2018). Intermediacy and the diffusion of grassroots innovations: The case of cohousing in the United States. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 32–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V. (2017). Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World Development, 93, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• DiGaetano, A., & Strom, E. (2003). Comparative urban governance: An integrated approach. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3), 356–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087402238806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, V., Goetz, K. H., & Wollmann, H. (2006). Governing after communism: Institutions and policymaking. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ehnert, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Barnes, J., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Kern, F., Strenchock, L., & Egermann, M. (2018). The acceleration of urban sustainability transitions: A comparison of Brighton, Budapest, Dresden, Genk, and Stockholm. Sustainability, 10(3), 612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehnert, F., Kern, F., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Maschmeyer, S., & Egermann, M. (2018). Urban sustainability transitions in a context of multi-level governance: A comparison of four European states. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 101–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell, M. L., & Alexander, J. A. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 456–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/256009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the transition movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., & Guy, S. (2009). Re-interpreting regulations: Architects as intermediaries for low-carbon buildings. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2577–2594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, L. B., & Newig, J. (2016). Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: A systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability, 8(5), 476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Egermann, M., & Ehnert, F. (2017). Nature-based solutions accelerating urban sustainability transitions in cities: Lessons from Dresden, Genk and Stockholm cities. In N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 65–88). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_5
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Dumitru, A., Anguelovski, I., Avelino, F., Bach, M., Best, B., Binder, C., Barnes, J., Carrus, G., Egermann, M., Haxeltine, A., Moore, M.-L., Mira, R. G., Loorbach, D., Uzzell, D., Omann, I., Olsson, P., Silvestri, G., Stedman, R., … Rauschmayer, F. (2016). Elucidating the changing roles of civil society in urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 41–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, S., Peters, M., & Woodman, B. (2016). Local authorities as niche actors: The case of energy governance in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., & Deuten, J. J. (2006). Local and global dynamics in technological development: A socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 265–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778984
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F., Turnheim, B., Asquith, M., Kern, F., & Kivimaa, P. (2019). Sustainability transitions: Policy and practice. European Environment Agency. https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2800/641030
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorissen, L., Spira, F., Meynaerts, E., Valkering, P., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2018). Moving towards systemic change? Investigating acceleration dynamics of urban sustainability transitions in the Belgian City of Genk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 171–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., de Boer, Y., Rockström, J., Ludwig, K., & Kok, M. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 7(2), 1651–1660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann, R., & April, K. (2013). On the role and capabilities of collaborative intermediary organisations in urban sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 12–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24003-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 868–880. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henfrey, T., & Kenrick, J. (2017). Climate, commons and hope: The transition movement in global perspective. In T. Henfrey, G. Maschkowski, & G. Penha-Lopes (Eds.), Resilience, community action and societal transformation: People, place, practice, power, politics and possibility in transition (pp. 161–190). Permanent Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009). Cities mediating technological transitions: understanding visions, intermediation and consequences. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(4), 515–534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320902819213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 477–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2011). Cities mediating technological transitions. In S. Guy, S. Marvin, W. Medd, & T. Moss (Eds.), Shaping urban infrastructures: Intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks (pp. 53–70). Earthscan Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2012). Mediating low-carbon urban transitions? Forms of organization, knowledge and action. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., Marvin, S., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). The intermediary organisation of low carbon cities: A comparative analysis of transitions in greater London and greater Manchester. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1403–1422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013480967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, R. (2013). The power of just doing stuff: How local action can change the world. Green Books.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, R., & Dalton, T. (2014). Transition to low carbon? An analysis of socio-technical change in housing renovation. Urban Studies, 51(16), 3445–3458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013516684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerneck, A., & Olsson, L. (2011). Breaking out of sustainability impasses: How to apply frame analysis, reframing and transition theory to global health challenges. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Kanda, W., Kuisma, M., Kivimaa, P., & Hjelm, O. (2020). Conceptualising the systemic activities of intermediaries in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 449–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., & Mathijs, E. (2014). (De)politicising the local: The case of the transition towns movement in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 172–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, J. (2013). What role for network governance in urban low carbon transitions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 133–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions. Research Policy, 43(8), 1370–1380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Bergek, A., Matschoss, K., & van Lente, H. (2020). Intermediaries in accelerating transitions: Introduction to the special issue. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 372–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J. (2019). Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 110–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Dynamics of policy change and intermediation: The arduous transition towards low-energy homes in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 83–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, I., & Kristof, L. (2009). The role of intermediate actors in transmitting rural goods and services in rural areas under urban pressure. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080902775025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M., Raworth, K., & Rockström, J. (2013). Between social and planetary boundaries: Navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity. In ISSC/UNESCO world social science report 2013: Changing global environments (pp. 84–89). OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (2009). New institutionalism and urban politics. In J. S. Davies, & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 91–105). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lukkarinen, J., Berg, A., Salo, M., Tainio, P., Alhola, K., & Antikainen, R. (2018). An intermediary approach to technological innovation systems (TIS) – The case of the cleantech sector in Finland. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 136–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martiskainen, M. (2017). The role of community leadership in the development of grassroots innovations. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 78–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiskainen, M., & Kivimaa, P. (2018). Creating innovative zero carbon homes in the United Kingdom – Intermediaries and champions in building projects. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 15–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., Guy, S., Medd, W., & Moss, T. (2011). Conclusions: The transformative power of intermediaries. In S. Guy, S. Marvin, W. Medd, & T. Moss (Eds.), Shaping urban infrastructures: Intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks (pp. 209–217). Earthscan Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maschkowski, G., & Wanner, M. (2014). Die transition-town-Bewegung: Empowerment für die große transformation? Planung Neu Denken Online, 2. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:wup4-opus-56266
   Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2017). Making it experimental in several ways: The work of intermediaries in raising the ambition level in local climate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 85–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken (8. Auflage). Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Medd, W., & Marvin, S. (2008). Making water work: Intermediating between regional strategy and local practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/d3205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignon, I., & Kanda, W. (2018). A typology of intermediary organizations and their impact on sustainability transition policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 100–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. M. (2009). Boundary spanning in homeless children’s education: Notes from an emergent faculty role in Pittsburgh. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X09333622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R., & Levenda, A. M. (2017). The politics of urban sustainability transitions. In N. Frantzeskaki, V. Castán Broto, L. Coenen, & D. Loorbach (Eds.), Urban sustainability transitions (pp. 346–355). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M.-L., Westley, F. R., & Brodhead, T. (2012). Social finance intermediaries and social innovation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.726020
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T. (2009). Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1480–1495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a4116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T. (2011). Intermediaries and the governance of urban infrastructures in transition. In S. Guy, S. Marvin, W. Medd, & T. Moss (Eds.), Shaping urban infrastructures: Intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks (pp. 17–35). Earthscan Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., Guy, S., Marvin, S., & Medd, W. (2011). Intermediaries and the reconfiguration of urban infrastructures: An introduction. In S. Guy, S. Marvin, W. Medd, & T. Moss (Eds.), Shaping urban infrastructures: Intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks (pp. 1–13). Earthscan Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., Medd, W., Guy, S., & Marvin, S. (2009). Organising water: The hidden role of intermediary work. Water Alternatives, 2(1), 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Kronsell, A., Voytenko Palgan, Y., & von Wirth, T. (2019). Municipalities as enablers in urban experimentation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 718–733. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1672525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., & Janda, K. B. (2014). More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out”. Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 102–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.011
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. (2005). Institutional theory in political science: The ‘new institutionalism’. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Polzin, F., von Flotow, P., & Klerkx, L. (2016). Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: Exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 34–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner, & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: The tools for policy analysis (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M., & Harvey, N. (2016). Translating science into coastal development decisions: The articulations science and planning in South Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations: Exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014). A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 21–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 763–770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between Green Niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Martiskainen, M., & Seyfang, G. (2016). Making the most of community energies: Three perspectives on grassroots innovation. Environment and Planning A, 48(2), 407–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15597908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., Turnheim, B., Martiskainen, M., Brown, D., & Kivimaa, P. (2020). Guides or gatekeepers? Incumbent-oriented transition intermediaries in a low-carbon era. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Dewulf, A. (2019). A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy and Society, 38(2), 298–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1497933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Metze, T. A. P. (2019). More than peanuts: Transformation towards a circular economy through a small-wins governance framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bosch, S., & Rotmans, J. (2008). Deepening, broadening and scaling up. A framework for steering transition experiments (Essay 02). Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch-Ohlenschlager, S. J. M. (2010). Transition experiments: Exploring societal changes towards sustainability. Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• van Lente, H., Boon, W. P. C., & Klerkx, L. (2020). Positioning of systemic intermediaries in sustainability transitions: Between storylines and speech acts. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 485–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(03), 247–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000817
   Google Scholar
• van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & van Waveren, B. (2011). Systemic intermediaries and transition processes. In S. Guy, S. Marvin, W. Medd, & T. Moss (Eds.), Shaping urban infrastructures: Intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks (pp. 36–52). Earthscan Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, R., & Stirling, A. (2013). Sustaining trajectories towards sustainability: Dynamics and diversity in UK communal growing activities. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 838–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. (2019). Learning urban energy governance for system innovation: An assessment of transformative capacity development in three South Korean cities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1512051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar