How organized credibility enables climate action: the U.S. climate security coalition as a credibility machine

References

• Acuto, M., & Rayner, S. (2016). City networks: Breaking gridlocks or forging (new) lock-ins? International Affairs, 92(5), 1147–1166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., Naess, L. O., Wolf, J., & Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3–4), 335–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFC staff. (2019). American flood coalition: Our policy platform. Floodcoalition.Org.
   Google Scholar
• Almiron, N., & Xifra, J. (2019). Climate change denial and public relations: Strategic communication and interest groups in climate inaction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Transnational Climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Defense Communities. (2019). Implementing the defense community infrastructure program: A survey of projects ready to enhance military value (Issue March).
   Google Scholar
• Bansard, J. S., Pattberg, P. H., & Widerberg, O. (2017). Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9318-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 211–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., & Palutikof, J. P.. (2014). The limits to adaptation: A comparative analysis. In J.P. Palutikof, S.L. Boulter, J. Barnett, & D. Rissik (Eds.), Applied Studies in Climate Adaptation (pp. 231–240).). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2006). Cities and the multilevel governance of Global climate change. Global Governance, 12(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/27800607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierbaum, R., Lee, A., & Smith, J. (2014). Ch. 28 adaptation, climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 210–221). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Palm, R., & Kingsland, J. T. (2019). The impact of message source on the effectiveness of communications about climate change. Science Communication, 41, 464–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019863154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouteligier, S. (2013). Cities, networks, and global environmental governance : Spaces of innovation, places of leadership. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R., & Timmons, J. R. (2021, April 23). What obstruction to Biden’s climate initiative will look like. The Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2014). Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2019). Networks of opposition: A structural analysis of U.S. climate change countermovement coalitions 1989–2015. Sociological Inquiry, xx(x), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12333
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2000). Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(6), 727–748. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c9905j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M., Newell, P., Paterson, M., Roger, C., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the “urban” politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Beyond state/non-state divides: Global cities and the governing of climate change. European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 743–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111413308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCS Staff. (2019). The center for climate and security: Events. Climateandsecurity.Org.
   Google Scholar
• Clary, J., & Grootendorst, G. (2013). Economic impact of the DoD in Hampton Roads (Issue October). https://www.nngov.com/DocumentCenter/View/5948
   Google Scholar
• CNA Military Advisory Board. (2007). National security and the threat of climate change.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J.. (2019). Understanding and countering misinformation about climate change. In I. Chiluwa & S. Samoilenko (Eds.), Handbook of research on deception, fake news, and misinformation online (pp. 281–306).
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2014). The “trust” heuristic: Arguments from authority in public health. Health Communication, 29(10), 1043–1056. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.831685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, D. E., Stephens, S. H., & Hagen, S. C. (2018). Transdisciplinary sea level rise risk communication and outreach strategies from stakeholder focus groups. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8, 13–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0443-8
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T., von Lucke, F., & Wellmann, Z. (2016). The securitisation of climate change: Actors, processes and consequences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2003). Defeating Kyoto : The conservative movement ‘ s impact on U. S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50(3), 348–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2010). Climate change denial: Sources, actors and strategies. In C. Lever-Tracy (Ed.), Routledge handbook of climate change and society (pp. 240–259). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 144–160). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0010.
   Google Scholar
• Eilperin, J., Dennis, B., & Ryan, M. (2019, April 8). As White House questions climate change, U.S. military is planning for it. The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Esposo, S. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Spoor, J. R. (2013). Shooting the messenger: Outsiders critical of your group are rejected regardless of argument quality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 386–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., McConnell, K., & Brulle, R. (2019). Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nature Climate Change, 9(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). 4 Public policy and discourse analysis. In Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices (pp. 73–93). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial: On the social construction of alternative facts. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2019.1602067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2020). Post-truth politics and climate denial: Further reflections. Critical Policy Studies, 14(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2020.1734846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R. (2013). Understanding the relationship between subnational and national climate change politics in the United States: Toward a theory of boomerang federalism. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 769–784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c11186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frug, G. E., & Barron, D. J. (2013). City bound: How states stifle urban innovation. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhr, H., Hickmann, T., & Kern, K. (2018). The role of cities in multi-level climate governance: Local climate policies and the 1.5°C target. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 30, 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fünfgeld, H. (2015). Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 67–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, K. (2020). Flows in formation: The global-urban networks of climate change adaptation. Urban Studies, 57(11), 2222–2240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018807306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019). A social identity approach to engaging Christians in the issue of climate change. Science Communication, 41(4), 442–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019860847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. J. (2018). Global urban climate governance in three and a half parts: Experimentation, coordination, integration (and contestation). Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, G., Árvai, J., Cayan, D., DeConto, R., Fox, J., Fricker, H. A., Kopp, R. E., Tebaldi, C., & Whiteman, E. (2017). Rising seas in California. April. http://www.opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/pdf/docs/rising-seas-in-california-an-update-on-sea-level-rise-science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in britain. In The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hallegatte, S., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2011). Understanding climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation at city scale: An introduction. Climatic Change, 104(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9981-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. (2010, December 3). Navy admiral urges action in dealing with climate. The Virginian-Pilot.
   Google Scholar
• Hejny, J. (2018). The Trump administration and environmental policy: Reagan redux ? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0470-0
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization and Environment, 24(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026611404336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (2015). Bridging the cultural schism. In How culture shapes the climate change debate (pp. 48–69). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of Multi-Level Governance, 97(2), 233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2020). Understanding (and reducing) inaction on climate change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HRPDC. (2016). Request for proposals: Multidisciplinary planning services for Hampton Roads Region - Norfolk and Virginia Beach Joint Land Use Study.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. (2017). The politics of urban climate change policy: Toward a research agenda. Urban Affairs Review, 53(2), 362–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416649756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Chu, E., & Mason, S. (2018). Climate change in cities: Innovations in multi-level governance. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C. L., Gupta, K., & Ripberger, J. T. (2014). Belief system continuity and change in policy advocacy coalitions: Using cultural theory to specify belief systems, coalitions, and sources of change. Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 484–508. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Toly, N., & Schroeder, H. (2015). The urban climate challenge : Rethinking the role of cities in the global climate regime. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Juhola, S., Glaas, E., Linner, B. O., & Neset, T. S. (2016). Redefining maladaptation. Environmental Science and Policy, 55, 135–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalafatis, S. E., & Lemos, M. C. (2017). The emergence of climate change policy entrepreneurs in urban regions. Regional Environmental Change, 17(6), 1791–1799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1154-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. (2013). Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S. (2021). Climate change, disinformation, and how to combat It. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, S. E. (2015). The military-environmental complex. Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis, 45, 10763–10769.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, B. A., Hasell, A., Tallapragada, M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2019). Conversion messages and attitude change: Strong arguments, not costly signals. Public Understanding of Science, 28(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518821017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., McCright, A. M., Dietz, T., & Dunlap, R. E. (2014). Politics eclipses climate extremes for climate change perceptions. Global Environmental Change, 29, 246–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and “studying through” the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a44178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., Charters, M., Dentzman, K., & Dietz, T. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter-frame. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3097132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change And polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, T. G., Preston, B. L., Smith, T. F., Brooke, C., Gorddard, R., Withycombe, G., & Morrison, C. (2011). Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(8), 889–909. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mols, F., Bell, J., & Head, B. (2018). Bridging the research-policy gap: The importance of effective identity leadership and shared commitment. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 16(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/174426418 ( 15378681300533
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(3), 345–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2011). Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. In J.S. Dryzek, R.B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 161–174). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C., & Ekstrom, J. A. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(51), 22026–22031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007887107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Ocean Service, NOAA, & U.S. Department of Commerce. (2015). Coastal flooding in California: What you need to know. http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/news/dec15/california-flooding.html
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, W., & Luetz, J. M. (2019). What can we learn from Pope Francis about change management for environmental sustainability? A case study on success factors for leading change in change-resistant institutional environments. In W. L. Filho, & A. C. McCrea (Eds.), Sustainability and the humanities (pp. 503–524). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., Pattberg, P., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Multiactor governance and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1), 365–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-094659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C.. (2009). Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberlack, C. (2017). Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(5), 805–838. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9699-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition Technology and Logistics. (2014). Memo: DoD climate preparedness and resilience planning pilots.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a44179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. (2018). Diminishing borders and conflating spaces: A storyline to promote soft planning scales. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 1008–1027. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1430750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y. (2010). Credibility and cognitive authority of information. In M.J. Bates & M.N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed.), pp. 1337–1344). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1081/e-elis3-120044103
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Lankao, P., Bulkeley, H., Pelling, M., Burch, S., Gordon, D. J., Gupta, J., Johnson, C., Kurian, P., Lecavalier, E., Simon, D., Tozer, L., Ziervogel, G., & Munshi, D. (2018). Urban transformative potential in a changing climate. Nature Climate Change, 8(9), 754–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, C., & Solecki, W. (2018). Action pathways for transforming cities. Nature Climate Change, 8(9), 754–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2021). Discourse, knowledge and governmentality: The influence of foucault. In Theory in planning research (pp. 149–169). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6568-1.
   Google Scholar
• Salon, D., Murphy, S., & Sciara, G. C. (2014). Local climate action: Motives, enabling factors and barriers. Carbon Management, 5(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Diego Economic Development Corporation. (2016, June 24). EDC, SDMAC talk regional defense sector in nation’s capital.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H., Burch, S., & Rayner, S. (2013). Novel multisector networks and entrepreneurship in urban climate governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 761–768. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c3105ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SDMAC. (2016). 8th Annual San Diego Military Economic Impact Study.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L., & Richardson, T. (2001). Reflections on foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.88
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L. (2019). Promise and paradox of metropolitan regional climate adaptation. Environmental Science and Policy, 92(April 2018), 262–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W., Mata, L., & Fünfgeld, H. (2015). Urban climate justice: Creating sustainable pathways for humans and other species. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 121–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhilber, E. E., Boswell, M., Considine, C., & Mast, L. (2016). Hampton Roads sea level rise preparedness and resilience intergovernmental pilot project, Phase 2 report: Recommendations, accomplishments and lessons learned.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, W. V., & Marra, J. J. (2016). 2015 State of U. S. “ Nuisance” tidal flooding. 2013–2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tahvilzadeh, N., Montin, S., & Cullberg, M. (2017). Functions of sustainability: Exploring what urban sustainability policy discourse “does” in the gothenburg metropolitan area. Local Environment, 22(May), 66–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1320538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teicher, H. M. (2019). Climate allies: How urban/military interdependence enables adaptation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2018, February 22). One arm of the Trump administration thinks climate change is a security threat. The Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Union of Concerned Scientists. (2016). The US military on the front lines of rising seas. http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2016/07/front-lines-of-rising-seas-key-executive-summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense, & Office of Economic Adjustment. (2015). Defense spending by state FY 2015.
   Google Scholar
• van Doren, D., Driessen, P. P. J., Runhaar, H., & Giezen, M. (2018). Scaling-up low-carbon urban initiatives: Towards a better understanding. Urban Studies, 55(1), 175–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016640456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (1997). Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority. Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. (2017). Commentary: Cities spearhead climate action. Nature Climate Change, 7(8), 537–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsko, C. (2017). Expanding the range of environmental values: Political orientation, moral foundations, and the common ingroup. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 284–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar