Biogas at the intersection of agricultural, environment and energy governance: (potentially) conflicting interests and consistent policy framework?

References

• Andersen, M. S., & Hansen, M. W. (1991). Vandmiljøplanen – Fra forhandling til symbol. Niche.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. S., & Nielsen, H. Ø. (2016). Denmark: Small state with big voice and bigger dilemmas. In R. Wurzel, J. Connelly, & D. Liefferink (Eds.), Still taking a lead? The European Union in international climate change politics (pp. 83–97). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2015). Interest group access to the bureaucracy Parliament and the media. Governance, 28(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biogasbranchen. (2015). Velkommen til Brancheforeningen for biogas. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from www.biogasbranchen.dk
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, J. (2000). Biogas i landbruget. In E. Beuse, J. Boldt, P. Maegaard, N. I. Meyer, J. Windeleff, & I. Østergaard (Eds.), Vedvarende Energi i Danmark - en krønike om 25 opvækstår 1975–2000. OVEs Forlag. https://www.klimadebat.dk/vedvarende-energi-i-danmark-c29.php
   Google Scholar
• Bush, R. E., & Bale, C. S. E. (2017). The role of intermediaries in transitions to district heating. Energy Procedia, 116, 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.098
   Google Scholar
• Candel, J. L. C., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990056. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, P. M., Nørgaard, A. S., & Sidenius, N. C. (2004). Hvem skriver lovene – Interesseorganisationer og politiske beslutninger. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P. A., & Toke, D. (2017). Energy transitions, sub-national government and regime flexibility: How has devolution in the United Kingdom affected renewable energy development? Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Society for Nature Conservation. (2015). DN’s politik for biogas – kort fortalt. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from www.dn.dk
   Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, C. (1998). Policy networks under pressure: Pollution control, policy reforms and the power of farmers. Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, C., & Pedersen, A. B. (2004). New policy ideas and old policy networks: Implementing Green taxation in Scandinavia. Journal of Public Policy, 24(2), 219–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X0400011X
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2009/28/EC. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0028 Directive 2018/2001/EU
   Google Scholar
• Directive EU 2018/2001. (2018). Directive EU 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/ EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32018L2001&from=ENhe
   Google Scholar
• Energistyrelsen. (2014). Biogas i Danmark - status, barrierer og perspektiver. [In English: Biogas in Denmark: status, barriers and perspectives.] Danish Energy Agency. https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Bioenergi/biogas_i_danmark_-_analyse_2014-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Energy Agreement. (2008). Agreement between the government (Liberal Party, Conservative People’s Party), Social Democrats, Danish People’s party, Socialist People’s Party, Social Liberals, and New Alliance about Danish Energy Policy for the years 2008–2011. https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/EnergiKlimapolitik/energiaftale-21022008_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Energy Agreement. (2012). Aftale mellem regeringen (Socialdemokraterne, Det Radikale Venstre, Socialistisk Folkeparti) og Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti, Enhedslisten og Det Konservative Folkeparti om den danske energipolitik 2012–2020. https://kefm.dk/media/6786/energiaftale2020.pdf (accessed December 13, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2014). SWD(2014) 259 final Commission Staff Working Document. State of play on the sustainability of solid and gaseous biomass used for electricity, Heating and cooling in the EU. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/2014_biomass_state_of_play_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Executive order no 301/25/03/2015. (2015). Executive order no 301/25/03/2015 on sustainable production of biogas. www.retsinfo.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., & Daugbjerg, C. (2012). Explaining governance outcomes: Epistemology, network governance and policy network analysis. Political Studies Review, 10(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, T., Larsen, S. U., Birkmose, T., Pedersen, J., Hinge, J., Trónd, L. G., Hansen, H. O., & Jensen, A. L. S. (2015). Scenarier for regional produktion og anvendelse af biomasse til energiformål. Agrotech A/S. https://www.rm.dk/siteassets/regional-udvikling/ru/publikationer/energi/biomassescenarier.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green Growth. (2009). Aftale om Grøn Vækst. 16. Juni 2009. https://www.ft.dk/samling/20111/almdel/miu/bilag/21/1030569.pdf (accessed November 23, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Green Growth. (2010). Aftale mellem Regeringen og Dansk Folkeparti om Grøn Vækst 2.0. [Agreement between the Government and Danish People’s Party about Green growth 2.0.]. https://docplayer.dk/16396608-Aftalemellem- regeringen-og-dansk-folkeparti-om-groen-vaekst-2-0.html (accessed April 9, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gregersen, K. H. (2012). Forbrænding eller biogas. Bioenergi Magasinet, 6(1), 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1999). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law & Policy, 21(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00065
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2008). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2019). Procedural policy tools and the temporal dimensions of policy design. International Review of Public Policy, 1(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.310
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. (2006). Energy policies of IEA countries: Denmark 2006. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264109728-en.pdf?expires=1605025187&id=id&accname=ocid177114&checksum=8943DCFD44AECEA843675275CDFF0CA8
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, G. (1990). Sub-governments, policy communities and networks. Refilling the old bottles. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692890002003004
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, U., & Olesen, J. E. (2011). Biomasse til energi – bæredygtig løsning eller molbohistorie. Aktuel Videnskab, 2011(4), 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jyllands-Posten. (2010). Gylle og ko-møg skal brændes af. Retrieved June 7, 2010, from https://jyllands-posten.dk/indland/article4337726.ece/
   Google Scholar
• Kampman, B., Bergsma, G., Schepers, B., Croezen, H., Fritsche, U. R., Henneberg, K., Huenecke, K., Molenaar, J. W., Kessler, J. J., Slingerland, S., & Linde, C. v. d. (2010). Background Report to the Position Paper of IEA RETD and IEA Bioenergy. https://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Better-Use-of-Biomass-for-Energy-Background-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragesteen, H. T. (2012, January). DN skærper holdning til biogas. Altinget, 17, https://www.altinget.dk/miljoe/artikel/dn-skaerper-holdning-til-biogas
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. (Ed.). (1998). Comparing policy networks. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.). (1992). Policy networks in British government. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Jochim, A. E. (2013). Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, F., Angst, F., & Fischer, M. (2020). Policy integration: DO laws or actors integrate issues relevant to flood risk management in Switzerland? Global Environmental Change, 61, 101945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, N. I. (2000). Oprettelse af et energiministerium i 1979. I. In E. Beuse, J. Boldt, P. Maegaard, N. I. Meyer, J. Windeleff, & I. Østergaard (Eds.), Vedvarende Energi i Danmark - en krønike om 25 opvækstår 1975–2000. OVEs Forlag. https://www.klimadebat.dk/vedvarende-energi-i-danmark-c29.php
   Google Scholar
• Miljø- og Energiministeriet. (1996). Energi 21. Regeringens energihandlingsplan. https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Basisfremskrivning/energi211996.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. H. (2002). Samfundsøkonomiske analyser af biogasfællesanlæg: Med tekniske og selskabsøkonomiske baggrundsanalyser (FOI rapport no.136). Fødevareøkonomisk Institut. https://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/127936669/FOI_Rapport_136.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P. & McGunn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector–environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOAH. (2012). NOAH Energi og Klima ́s kommentar til forslag til ændring af lov om fremme af vedvarende energi, lov om elforsyning, lov om naturgasforsyning og lov om Energinet.dk. https://noah.dk/sites/default/files/2016-12/2012-04-27-NOAH-EK-h%C3%B8ringssvar-til-%C3%A6ndring-af-lov-om-VE-biogas-mv.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Öberg, P. O., Svensson, T., Christiansen, P. M., Nørgaard, A. S., Rommetvedt, H., & Thesen, G. (2011). Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: Government authority and interest group capability in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition, 46(3), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2011.01343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, A. B. (2010). The fight over Danish nature: Explaining policy network change and policy change. Public Administration, 88(2), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01790.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2018). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1-2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. J., & Jordan, A. G. (1979). Governing under pressure. The policy process in a post-parliamentary democracy. Martin Robertson & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2017). Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 1–10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617303092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerbrei, R., Ekschmitt, K., Wolters, V., & Gottschalk, T. K. (2014). Increased energy maize production reduces farmland bird diversity. GCB Bioenergy, 6(3), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12146
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, A. E. (2018). Energipolitik 1972–1993. Danmarkshistorien.dk. https://danmarkshistorien.dk/leksikon-og-kilder/vis/materiale/energipolitik-1972-1993/
   Google Scholar
• Toke, D., & Nielsen, HØ. (2015). Policy consultation and political styles: Renewable energy consultations in the UK and Denmark. British Politics, 10(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570.https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Zhao, F., Liu, S., Wang, L., Qiu, L., Alexandrov, G., & Jothiprakash, V. (2018). Bioenergy production and environmental impacts. Geoscience Letters, 5(1), art.14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-018-0114-y
   Google Scholar