Governing complex environmental policy mixes through institutional bricolage: lessons from the water-forestry-energy-climate nexus

References

• Andrews-Speed, P. (1999). The politics of petroleum and the energy charter treaty as an effective investment regime. Journal of Energy Finance and Development, 4(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00003-4
   Google Scholar
• Andrews-Speed, P. (2019). Transitions, institutions and public policy. In P. Andrews-Speed, & S. Zhang (Eds.), China as a global clean energy champion: Lifting the veil (pp. 33–68). Palgrave Series in Asia and Pacific Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. S. (1996). The European energy charter treaty. Reality or illusion? Energy Policy, 24(6), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(96)00022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberger, C. S. (1996). An overview of the energy charter treaty. In T. W. Waelde (Ed.), European energy charter treaty: An east-west gateway for investment and trade? (pp. 1–34). Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff/Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, T., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). UN–water and its role in global water governance. Ecology and Society, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05564-180303
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D. (2007). Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2012). The politics of policy change: Welfare, Medicare, and social security reform in the United States. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, D., Gain, A., & Rouillard, J. (2015). Water governance in a comparative perspective: From IWRM to a “nexus” approach? Water Alternatives, 8 (1), 756–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Pattberg, P. H., van Asselt, H. D., & Zelli, F. (2007). Fragmentation of global governance architectures. The case of climate policy. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, A. K. (2008). Integrated water resources management: Is it working? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701871718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I. (2006). Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 346–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., & Börzel, T. A. (2010). Non-hierarchical policy coordination in multilevel systems. European Political Science Review, 2(2), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391000007X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski, I., Le Bourhis, J.-P., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Barraqué, B. (2008). Spatial misfit in participatory river basin management: Effects on social learning, a comparative analysis of German and French case studies. Ecology and Society, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02341-130107
   Google Scholar
• Braathen, N. (2007a). Instrument mixes addressing non-point sources of water pollution (p. 100). OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Braathen, N. (2007b). Instrument mixes for environmental policy: How many stones should be used to kill a bird? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1(2), 185–235. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000005
   Google Scholar
• Braatz, S. (2003). International forest governance: International forest policy, legal and institutional framework. XII World Forestry Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Briassoulis, H. (2004). Policy integration for complex policy problems: What, why and how. In 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies - Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin (pp. 1–30).
   Google Scholar
• Briassoulis, H. (ed.). (2005). Policy integration for complex environmental problems: The example of Mediterranean desertification. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M. J. (2009). International conflict management. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. M., Gray, N. J., Fairbanks, L., Silver, J. J., Gruby, R. L., Dubik, B. A., & Basurto, X. (2016). Global oceans governance: New and emerging issues. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021121
   Google Scholar
• Cartel, M., Boxenbaum, E., & Aggeri, F. (2014). Policy making as bricolage: The role of platforms in institutional innovation. Paper presented at The 30th EGOS Colloquium 2014, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., Brandi, C., & Bauer, S. (2016). Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance: The road from Paris. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. (2003). A policy mix for environmentally sustainable development—Learning from the Dutch experience. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, 7(1), 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. D., & Franks, T. R. (2005). How institutions elude design: River basin management and sustainable livelihoods. University of Bradford. Bradford Centre for International Development. BCID Research Paper, No. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Conca, K., Wu, F., & Mei, C. (2006). Global regime formation or complex institution building? The principled content of international river agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, H., Ajami, N., Ha, M.-L., Srinivasan, V., Morrison, J., Donnelly, K., & Christian-Smith, J. (2013). Global water governance in the 21st century. Pacific Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dellapenna, J. W., & Gupta, J. (eds.). (2009). The evolution of the law and politics of water. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• del Río, P. (2007). The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes. An overview of the literature. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(8), 1363–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9069-y
   Google Scholar
• del Río, P. (2009). Interactions between climate and energy policies: The case of Spain. Climate Policy, 9(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Río, P. (2010). Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: The impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4978–4989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, R. (2002). Confronting nonregimes: Science and international coral reef policy. The Journal of Environment & Development, 11(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049650201100103
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, R., Sprinz, D. F., DiGiusto, G. M., & Kelle, A. (2007). International nonregimes: A research agenda. International Studies Review, 9(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2007.00672.x
   Google Scholar
• Doremus, H. (2003). A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands. Environmental Science & Policy, 6(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00036-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P. (1985). National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5(4), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003287
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., & Bernsen, K. (2011). Globalization of water: The case for global water governance? Nature and Culture, 6(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2011.060301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giessen, L. (2013). Reviewing the main characteristics of the international forest regime complex and partial explanations for its fragmentation. International Forestry Review, 15(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554813805927192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60(4), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Water Partnership (GWP). (2000). Towards water security: A framework for action (pp. 1–18).
   Google Scholar
• Grabosky, P. N. (1995). Counterproductive regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 23(4), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-6595(05)80003-6
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. (2003). The evolving forest regime and domestic actors: Strategic or normative adaptation? Environmental Politics, 12(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. (2004). Overlapping public and private governance: Can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environmental Politics, 4(2), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638004323074200
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, G. (2003). Pros and cons ensuing from fragmentation of international law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 849–862.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseus, D., & Pal, L. A. (1997). Anatomy of a policy area: The case of shipping. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques, 23(4), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (1999). Federalism and public policy. In J. Bickerton & A. Gagnon (Eds.), Canadian politics (3rd ed., pp. 523–539). Peterborough: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2004). Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: Instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy and Society, 23(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(04)70030-2
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802648144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C, 33(5), 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15610059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Kim, J., & Weaver, P. (2006). Assessing instrument mixes through program- and agency-level data: Methodological issues in contemporary implementation research. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00189.x
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Shivakoti, R. (2018). Improving international policy-making in the absence of treaty regimes: The international forestry, migration and water policy cases. International Journal of Public Policy, 14(5/6), 303. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2018.096664
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Vince, J., & del Río, P. (2017). Policy integration and multi-level governance: Dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs. Politics and Governance, 5(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i2.928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, D. (1996). Forest politics: The evolution of international cooperation. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, D. (2001). Forest negotiations at the United Nations: Explaining cooperation and discord. Forest Policy and Economics, 3(3-4), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00039-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. W. (2002). The Mekong River Commission: Transboundary water resources planning and regional security. The Geographical Journal, 168(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2002.00061.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager, N. W., Challies, E., Kochskämper, E., Newig, J., Benson, D., Blackstock, K., Collins, K., Ernst, A., Evers, M., Feichtinger, J., Fritsch, O., Gooch, G., Grund, W., Hedelin, B., Hernández-Mora, N., Hüesker, F., Huitema, D., Irvine, K., Klinke, A., … Von Korff, Y. (2016). Transforming European water governance? Participation and river basin management under the EU water Framework directive in 13 member states. Water, 8(4), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Benson, D., Zito, A., & Wurzel, R. (2012). Environmental policy: Governing by multiple policy instruments? In J. J. Richardson (Eds.), Constructing a policy state? Policy dynamics in the EU (pp. 104–124). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Oppenheimer, M. (2016). Paris: Beyond the climate dead end through pledge and review? Politics and Governance, 4(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i3.634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konoplyanik, A. A. (1996). The energy charter treaty: A Russian perspective. In T. W. Waelde (Ed.), European energy charter treaty: An east-west gateway for investment and trade? (pp. 156–178). Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff/Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., Kars, M., & van der Voort, H. (2009). Vertical politics in horizontal policy networks: Framework setting as coupling arrangement. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafortezza, R., Davies, C., Sanesi, G., & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2013). Green infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions. IForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0723-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F., & Moss, T. (2014). Spatial fit and water politics: Managing asymmetries in the Dongjiang River basin. International Journal of River Basin Management, 12(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2014.917420
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. The University of Chicago Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C., & Hoggett, R. (2016). Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35(2), 312–333.
   Google Scholar
• Marier, P. (2008). Empowering epistemic communities: Specialised politicians, policy experts and policy reform. West European Politics, 31(3), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380801939800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., Jones, B. D., Beem, B. E., Neff-Sharum, E. A., & Poague, M. K. (2005). Policy coherence and component-driven policymaking: Arctic policy in Canada and the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 33(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00091.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool, D. (1998). The subsystem family of concepts: A critique and a proposal. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E., & Stead, D.. (2004). Policy Integration: What Does It Mean and How Can It Be Achieved? A Multi-Disciplinary Review. In 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies - Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin (pp. 1–15).
   Google Scholar
• Metz, F., & Glaus, A. (2019). Integrated water resources management and policy integration: Lessons from 169 years of flood policies in Switzerland. Water, 11(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkman, K., Mazza, M. C., Shu, L., Tsay, C.-J., & Bazerman, M. (2012). Policy bundling to overcome loss aversion: A method for improving legislative outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namara, R., & Giordano, M. (2017). Economic rationale for cooperation on international waters in Africa: A review. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Papaioannou, A. (1995). Security of energy supply: The approach on the European Union and the contribution of the energy charter treaty. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2(1), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X9500200104
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of co-ordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. (2005). Conclusion: The future of instruments research. In P. Eliadis, M. Hill, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Designing government: From instruments to governance (pp. 353–363). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710
   Google Scholar
• Puzl, H. (2009, September 10). The politics of forests: The (non-) governance of natural resources within the United Nations. Presented at the paper prepared for the 5th ECPR general conference, Potsdam Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2009). Conclusion: Governance arrangements and policy capacity for policy integration. Policy and Society, 28(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C., Geels, F. W., Lockwood, M., Newell, P., Schmitz, H., Turnheim, B., & Jordan, A. (2018). The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 44(3), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. (2012, November 26). Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. Qualitative Report, 17(48), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1704
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. J., & Matthews, N. (2017). Global challenges in water governance: Environments, economies, societies. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sehring, J., & Neef, A. (2009). Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in post-Soviet water governance. Water Alternatives, 2(1), 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., Geerlings, H., & Meijers, E. (2004). Policy integration in practice: The integration of land use planning, transport and environmental policy-making in Denmark, England and Germany. Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, R. M., Mohtar, R. H., Daher, B., Irujo, A. E., Hillers, A., Ganter, J. C., Karlberg, L., Martin, L., Nairizi, S., Rodriguez, D. J., & Sarni, W. (2018). Water–energy–food nexus: A platform for implementing the sustainable development goals. Water International, 43(3), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2018.1446581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleimenov, M., & Holland, W. (1996). The energy charter treaty and the development of Kazakhstan legislation. In T. W. Waelde (Ed.), European energy charter treaty: An east-west gateway for investment and trade? (pp. 179–196). Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff/Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Tarasofsky, R. (1995). The international forests regime. IUCN–the World Conservation Union, World Wide Fund for Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Tarasofsky, R. (1999). Assessing the international forest regime. IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Triebskorn, R. (2020). Civil society and the governance of water services: German political parties’ reactions to right2water. Water, 12(3), 743–759. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Decision 1/CP.21. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Waelde, T. W. (1995). International investment under the 1994 energy charter treaty. Journal of World Trade, 29(1), 5–72.
   Google Scholar
• Widerberg, O., & Pattberg, P. (2015). International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? Global Policy, 6(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widerberg, O., & Pattberg, P. (2017). Accountability challenges in the transnational regime complex for climate change. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, P., & Muller, M. (2017). Water governance—an historical perspective on current debates. World Development, 92, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. (1999). The effectiveness of International environmental regimes. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., & Leong, C. (2018). Embedding innovation: Bricolage and the case of the Phnom Penh water supply authority. In C. Bakir, & D. S. L. Jarvis (Eds.), Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change: Theoretical and empirical explorations (pp. 221–242). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar