Empirical insights into knowledge-weaving processes in strategic environmental research

References

• Arnott, J. C., Neuenfeldt, R. J., & Lemos, M. C. (2020). Co-producing science for sustainability: Can funding change knowledge use? Global Environmental Change, 60, 101979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (2007). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, S., Berkhout, F., Tuinstra, W., Tàbara, J. D., Jäger, J., Chabay, I., de Wit, B., Langlais, R., Mills, D., Moll, P., Otto, I. M., Petersen, A., Pohl, C., & van Kerkhoff, L. (2013). Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environmental Science & Policy, 28, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djenontin, I.N.S., Meadow, A.M. (2018). The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: Lessons from international practice. Environmental Management 61(6), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1028-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godemann, J. (2008). Knowledge integration: A key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802469188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, B., Cochrane, L., & Van Epp, M. (2019). Charting knowledge co-production pathways in climate and development. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelt, M., Haila, K., Sepponen, S., & Sirppiniemi, R. (2021). Strategisen tutkimuksen ohjelmat 2016–2019: yhteiskunnallisen vaikuttavuuden arviointi [Strategic research programmes 2016–2019: societal impact assessment]. Gaia Group, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Huutoniemi, K. (2014). Tieteidenvälisen ympäristötutkimuksen metodologiasta – HENVI-tutkimusohjelmien tarkastelu [On the methodology of interdisciplinary environmental research – HENVI research programmes review]. http://www.helsinki.fi/henvi/tutkimus/Huutoniemi2014_HENVI-raportti-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, K., Arnott, J., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., Mach, K., Moss, R., & Sjostrom, D. (2020). Great expectations? Reconciling the aspiration, outcome, and possibility of co-production. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42(42), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.010
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(Suppl.1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., Arnott, J. C., Ardoin, N. M., Baja, K, Bednarek, A.T, Dewulf, A, Fieseler, C, Goodrich, C.A, Jagannathan, K, Klenk, N, Mach, K.J, Meadow, A.M, Meyer, R, Moss, R, Nichols, L, Sjostrom, K.D, Stults, M, Turnhout, E, Vaughan, C…Wyborn, C, (2018). To co-produce or not to co-produce. Nature Sustainability, 1(12), 722–724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuk, F. A., Turnhout, E., Fleskens, L., do Amaral, E. F., Haverroth, M., & Behagel, J. H. (2020). Allying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability: The Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá indigenous people case. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A., & Wyborn, C. (2020). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 113, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkkinen, M. (2019). The anatomy of plausible futures in policy processes: Comparing the cases of data protection and comprehensive security. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 143, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkkinen, M., Ahokas, I., & Auffermann, B. (2018). Kokonaisturvallisuuden ennakoinnin kehittäminen Suomessa. Winland-hanke [Development of overall safety forecasting in Finland. The Winland project]. https://winlandtutkimus.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/winland_raportti_turvallisuus_digi_isbn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Montana, J. (2019). Co-production in action: Perceiving power in the organisational dimensions of a global biodiversity expert process. Sustainability Science, 14(6), 1581–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00669-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, M.F, Lof, M.F, West, S, Wyborn, C, Balvanera, A, Bednarek, A.T, Bennet, E.M, Biggs, R, de Beremond, A, Campbell, B, Canadell, J.G, Carpenter, S.R, Folke, C, Fulton, E.A, Gaffney, O, Gelcich, S, Jouffray, J-B, Leach, M…Osterblom, H, (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Proposed by the Swiss academies of arts and sciences. Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Palmer, H., Riise, J., Smit, W., & Valencia, S. (2018). The challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production: From unilocal to comparative research. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818787177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SRC. (2020). What is strategic research? Strategic Research Council (SRC) website: https://www.aka.fi/en/strategic-research-funding/src-in-brief/
   Google Scholar
• Stepanova, O., Polk, M., & Saldert, H. (2019). Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration: An interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice. Sustainability Science, 15, 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00690-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomen Akatemia [Academy of Finland]. (2021). Strategisen tutkimuksen ohjelmat 2016-2019, itsearviointiraportit [Strategic research programmes 2016–2019, self-evaluation reports]. Suomen Akatemia 2021, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., Elmqvist, T., & Folke, C. (2017). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., & Louder, E. (2020). The politics of co-production: Participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, K., Carter, S., Steynor, A., Visman, E, Lund Wagsather, K (2020). Addressing power imbalances in co-production. Nature Climate Change. 10(10), 877–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00910-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinke-de Kruijf, J., Verbrugge, L. N. H., Schröter, B., den Haan, R.-J., Cortes Arevalo, V. J., Fliervoet, J., Henze, J., & Albert, C. (in press). Knowledge co-production and researcher roles in transdisciplinary environmental management projects. Accepted for publication in Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Westberg, L., & Polk, M. (2016). The role of learning in transdisciplinary research: Moving from a normative concept to an analytical tool through a practice-based approach. Sustainability Science, 11(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0358-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C., Datta, A., Montana, J., Ryan, M., Leith, P., Chaffin, B., Miller, C., & van Kerkhoff, L. (2019). Co-Producing sustainability: Reordering the governance of science, policy, and practice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44(1), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar