Co-evolutionary dynamics of experimental governance: a longitudinal study of sustainable mobility services in Oslo

References

• Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2014). Collaboration and design: New tools for public innovation. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Public innovation through collaboration and design (pp. 1–19). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016). The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2020). Doing’ system innovations from within the heart of the regime. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1776099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., Geels, F. W., & McMeekin, A. (2017). Reconfiguring urban sustainability transitions, analysing multiplicity. Sustainability, 9(2), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstad, H., & Vedeld, T. (2021). Exploring city climate leadership in theory and practice: Responding to the polycentric challenge. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(4), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1883425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., K, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for sustainable transport: The approach of strategic niche management. Spoon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., Jordan, A., Munaretto, S., & Hildén, M. (2018). Policy experimentation: Core concepts, political dynamics, governance and impacts. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9321-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M., Huitema, D., Jordan, A., & Newig, J. (2017). Experiments in climate governance – A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2018). Experimental governance: The role of municipalities in urban living labs. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 988–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Ven, A. H. V. d. (2013). Process studies of change in Organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The New institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadgen, B., & Huitema, D. (2018). Experimentation at the interface of science and policy: A multi-case analysis of how policy experiments influence political decision-makers. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9276-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701763161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Kronsell, A., Voytenko Palgan, Y., & von Wirth, T. (2019). Municipalities as enablers in urban experimentation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 718–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1672525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J., Salomaa, A., & Juhola, S. (2021). Governing urban sustainability transitions: Urban planning regime and modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(4), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1776690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Tarpey, M. (2019). Are wicked problems really so wicked? Perceptions of policy problems. Policy and Society, 38(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1626595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., & Smith, A. (2016). Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2019). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Dewulf, A. (2019). A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy and Society, 38(2), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1497933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2016). Transforming the public Sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
   Google Scholar
• von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., & Simons, A. (2018). A novel understanding of experimentation in governance: Co-producing innovations between “lab” and “field”. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9313-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., Frantzeskaki, N., & Maschmeyer, S. (2016). Cities, systems and sustainability: Status and perspectives of research on urban transformations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar