Ideational bricolage as a route to transforming local institutions for heat decarbonisation: heat networks and local government in England

References

• Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of new institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, R. (2014). The energy challenge for cities - A look at Sheffield. Sheffield City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, H., Hovelsrud, G. K., Aall, C., Karlsson, M., & Westskog, H. (2018). Local governments as drivers for societal transformation: Towards the 1.5 °C ambition. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.004.
   Google Scholar
• APSE. (2013). The road to 2020: A manifesto for the ensuring council. Association of Public Service Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Bale, C., Bush, R., Hawkey, D., Webb, J. (2014). Valuation of passive provision for heat network investments. In A. Brown, & M. Robertson (Eds.), Economic evaluation of systems of infrastructure provision: Concepts, approaches, methods. University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2021). Bristol energy’s latest figures show nearly £15m loss. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-55622656 (Accessed: 12 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. (2018a). Heat networks investment project scheme overview.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. (2018b). Heat networks investment project application guidance.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. (2019). Heat network investment project (HNIP) Pilot 2019. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/heat-networks-investment-project-hnip/heat-networks-investment-project-hnip-pilot-scheme-update#update-2 (Accessed: 14 June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. (2020). Heat networks: building a market framework.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. (2021a). Heat and buildings strategy.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. (2021b). Heat network zoning.
   Google Scholar
• Birmingham City Council. (2014). From waste to resource A sustainable strategy for 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bramah, M. (2014). What will local government service provision look like in 2020? APSE.
   Google Scholar
• Bristol City Council. (2015). Our resilient future: A framework for climate and energy security.
   Google Scholar
• Bristol City Council. (2016a). Cabinet Report: Heat Networks Phase 2. Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Bristol City Council. (2016b). New mayor approves first major project towards 2050 carbon-neutrality goal. Available at: http://news.bristol.gov.uk/new_mayor_approves_first_major_project_towards_2050 (Accessed: 7 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, R. E., Bale, C. S. E., Powell, M., Gouldson, A., Taylor, P. G., & Gale, W. F. (2017). The role of intermediaries in low carbon transitions – empowering innovations to unlock district heating in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 137–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon Connect. (2014). Pathways for heat: Low carbon heat for buildings. Future heat series part 1. London.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B. (2011a). Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change. Political Studies, 59(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00868.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B. (2011b). Paradigm man vs. The bricoleur: Bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casemine. (2019). Equitix ESI CHP (Sheff) Ltd v Veolia Energy and Utility Services UK PLC. Available at:https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5d133cf52c94e0558cd68443 (Accessed: 8 November 2021).
   Google Scholar
• CMA. (2016). Energy market investigation. Summary of final report. Competition & Markets ity.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Climate Change. (2016). Next steps for UK heat policy. CCC.
   Google Scholar
• Committe on Climate Change. (2019). Net zero: The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming. CCC.
   Google Scholar
• Competition and Markets Authority. (2018). Heat networks market study final report. CMA.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P. A., & Toke, D. (2017). Rescaling the governance of renewable energy: Lessons from the UK devolution experience. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(5), 480–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1008437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DECC. (2012). The future of heating : A strategic framework for low carbon heat in the UK.
   Google Scholar
• DECC. (2013). The future of heating: meeting the challenge.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In, The New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/258726.
   Google Scholar
• Dobravec, V., Matak, N., Sakulin, C., & Krajačić, G. (2021). Multilevel governance energy planning and policy: A view on local energy initiatives. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11(2), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00277-y.
   Google Scholar
• Ehnert, F., Kern, F., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Maschmeyer, S., & Egermann, M. (2018). Urban sustainability transitions in a context of multi-level governance: A comparison of four European states. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Element Energy. (2015). Research on district heating and local approaches to heat decarbonisation. A study for the committee on climate change. CCC.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339638.
   Google Scholar
• Gailing, L., Bues, A., Kern, K., & Röhring, A. (2020). Socio-spatial dimensions in energy transitions: Applying the TPSN framework to case studies in Germany. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1112–1130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19845142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillard, R. (2016). Unravelling the United Kingdom’s climate policy consensus: The power of ideas, discourse and institutions’. Global Environmental Change, 40, 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldson, A., Kerr, N., Topi, C., Dawkins, E., Kuylenstierna, J., & Pearce, R. (2012). The economics of low carbon cities: A mini-stern review for the Sheffield City region. University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In M. van den Brink, & T. Metze (Eds.), Words matter in policy and planning: Discourse theory and method in the social sciences (pp. 65–74). Netherlands Geographical Studies 344.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., & Foxon, T. J. (2014). Values in the smart grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution. Energy Policy, 74, 600–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.018.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkey, D., & Webb, J. (2014). District energy development in liberalised markets: Situating UK heat network development in comparison with Dutch and Norwegian case studies. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26(10), 1228–1241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.971001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkey, D., Webb, J., & Winskel, M. (2013). Organisation and governance of urban energy systems: District heating and cooling in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 22–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, D., & Mårdsjö, O. (2010). Barriers to district heating development in some European countries. In 12th International symposium on district heating and cooling, September 5th–September 7th, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, T., & van Bueren, E. (2015). Guest editorial: Governing the challenges of climate change and energy transition in cities. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 5(1), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-015-0047-7.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. (2021). District heating report. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/district-heating (Accessed: 22 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Isoaho, K., & Karhunmaa, K. (2019). A critical review of discursive approaches in energy transitions. Energy Policy, 128, 930–942. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M., & Wiering, M. (2022). The role of discourses in understanding institutional stability and change-an analysis of Dutch flood risk governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1935222.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R., & Debbané, A. M. (2005). Scaling discourse analysis: Experiences from Hermanus, South Africa and Walvis Bay, Namibia. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339786.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Kuzemko, C., & Mitchell, C. (2014). Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: The case of UK energy policy. Policy & Politics, 42(4), 513–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C. (2013). Understanding the politics of Low carbon transition: Context, paradigms and power. Working paper 1301. Energy policy group. University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., Feindt, P. H., Winkel, G., & Keller, R. (2019). Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 445–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., & Benson, D. (2014). Radical institutional change in environmental governance: Explaining the origins of the UK climate change Act 2008 through discursive and streams perspectives. Global Environmental Change, 29, 10–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (2010). The institutional approach’. In D. Marsh, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 60–79). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Mccaughie, K. (2013). Weathering the perfect storm austerity and institutional resilience in local government. Policy and Politics, 41(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T., Becker, S., & Naumann, M. (2014). Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions. Local Environment(November 2014), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.915799.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Moss, T. (2017). Scale in environmental governance: Moving from concepts and cases to consolidation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(5), 473–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1390926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, A. (2013). Sheffield & district energy network development. Sheffield City Council. Available at: http://yourclimate.github.io/system/files/documents/AndyNolan-Sheffield%26DistrictHeatingNetwork.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rao, L., Chittum, A., King, M., & Yoon, T. (2017). Governance models and strategic decision-making processes for deploying thermal grids. International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism”. European Political Science Review, 2(01), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2002). Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönberger, P. (2013). Municipalities as key actors of German renewable energy governance: An analysis of opportunities, obstacles, and multi-level influences. No. 186. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield City Council. (2018). Green city strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield City Region LEP. (2012). MADE in Sheffield – a deal for growth’.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield Green Commission. (2016). Sheffield’s green commitment. Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2015). District energy in cities. Unlocking the potential of energy efficiency and renewable energy. United Nations Environmental Programme. Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J. (2015). Improvising innovation in UK urban district heating: The convergence of social and environmental agendas in Aberdeen. Energy Policy, 78, 265–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J., & Hawkey, D. (2017). On (not) assembling a market for sustainable energy: Heat network infrastructure and British cities. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2016.1226193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar