How the waste management system’s materialised normativity influences engagement in sustainable waste practices.

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkemeyer, T., & Buschmann, N. (2016). Learning in and across practices: Enablement as subjectivation. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations and practitioners (pp. 20–35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816-9
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (2001). Handbook of ethnography (Issue 1967). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608337
   Google Scholar
• Barr, S., Guilbert, S., Metcalfe, A., Riley, M., Robinson, G. M., & Tudor, T. L. (2013). Beyond recycling: An integrated approach for understanding municipal waste management. Applied Geography, 39, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, A. L. (2016). Can people talk together about their practices? Focus groups, humour and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life. Area, 48(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buclet, N., & Godard, O. (2001). The evolution of municipal waste management in Europe: How different are national regimes? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.91
   Google Scholar
• Chappells, H., & Shove, E. (1999). The dustbin: A study of domestic waste, household practices and utility services. International Planning Studies, 4(2), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563479908721739
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, G., Lugosi, P., & Hawkins, R. (2020). Evaluating materiality in food waste reduction interventions. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 1(1), 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2020.100002
   Google Scholar
• Concito. (2018). Klimabarometeret 2018. https://concito.dk/files/dokumenter/artikler/klimabarometeret_2018_endelig_rev2.pdf%0Ahttps://concito.dk/udgivelser/klimabarometeret-2018
   Google Scholar
• Dahlbo, H., Aalto, K., Eskelinen, H., & Salmenperä, H. (2017). Increasing textile circulation—consequences and requirements. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 9, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danmarks statistik. (2019). Statistikbanken. https://www.statistikbanken.dk/FOLK1E
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage. https://books.google.dk/books?id=qEiC-_ELYgIC&source=gbs_book_similarbooks
   Google Scholar
• Di Foggia, G., & Beccarello, M. (2021). Designing waste management systems to meet circular economy goals: The Italian case. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017). Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Econet. (2021). Analyse af indsamlingspotentialer og densiteter for 8 affaldstyper.
   Google Scholar
• European Commision. (2018). Circular economy: New rules will make EU the global front-runner in waste management and recycling. Press Release. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_3846
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. (2012). Binning, gifting and recovery: The conduits of disposal in household food consumption. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(6), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1068/d22210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, B., Yang, W., & Shen, X. (2019). A comparison study of ‘motivation–intention–behavior’ model on household solid waste sorting in China and Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genus, A., & Jensen, C. (2019). Beyond ‘behaviour’: The institutionalisation of practice and the case of energy-efficient lighting in Denmark. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(3), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517717781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). The trajectories of the self. In Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age (pp. 70–108). Stanford University Press. http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=2660
   Google Scholar
• Godin, L., Laakso, S., & Sahakian, M. (2020). Doing laundry in consumption corridors: Wellbeing and everyday life. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1785095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K. (2011). Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510391725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2002). Fokusgrupper (1st ed.). Samfundslitteratur & Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2010). Ethnography : principles in practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. R., & Jacobsen, M. H. (2020). Like parent, like child: Intergenerational transmission of energy consumption practices in Denmark. Energy Research & Social Science, 61, 101341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, G. (2007). The ethics of waste: How we relate to rubbish [Book]. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hennchen, B. (2019). Knowing the kitchen: Applying practice theory to issues of food waste in the food service sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, A., Schatzki, T., & Shove, E (Eds.). (2016). The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
   Google Scholar
• Issock, P. B. I., Mpinganjira, M., & Roberts-Lombard, M. (2021). Trying to recycle domestic waste and feelings of guilt: A moderated mediation model applied to South African households. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, T. (2017). Cleanliness and consumption: Exploring material and social structuring of domestic cleaning practices. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katan, L. (2022). Revisiting the experience of inconvenience and everyday life practices: The case of waste sorting. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2031563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katan, L., & Gram-Hanssen, K. (2021). ‘‘Surely I would have preferred to clear it away in the right manner’: When social norms interfere with the practice of waste sorting: A case study. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100036
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, E., & Breadsell, J. K. (2021). Food waste and social practices in Australian households. Sustainability, 13(6), 3377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Københavns Kommune. (2022). AFFALD KBH Lejlighed.
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). S. Kvale, & S. Brinkmann (Eds.), Interview: det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk. Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, S., Jensen, C. L., Vadovics, E., Apajalahti, E. L., Friis, F., & Szőllőssy, A. (2021). Towards sustainable energy consumption : Challenging heating-related practices in Denmark, Finland, and Hungary [Article].
   Google Scholar
• LandbrugFødevarer. (2019). Danskerne vil gerne leve mere klimavenligt (Issue April). https://lf.dk/tal-og-analyser/forbrugere-og-trends/befolkning-adfaerd-og-samfund/2019/danskerne-vil-gerne-leve-mere-klimavenligt
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. P. A. K. (2021). Demand flexibility in district heating networks: An exploration of heating practices when smart home technology enters everyday life [Dissertation]. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. https://kbdk-aub.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/openurl?institution=45KBDK_AUB&vid=45KBDK_AUB:AUB&sid=pureportal&doi=10.54337%2Faau443225866
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, A., Riley, M., Barr, S., Tudor, T., Robinson, G., & Guilbert, S. (2012). Food waste bins: Bridging infrastructures and practices. The Sociological Review, 60(SUPPL.2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12042
   Google Scholar
• Miljøstyrelsen. (2014). Danmark uden affald - Ressourceplan for affaldshåndtering 2013-2018 Vejledning (Issue 4). https://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publikationer/2014/05/978-87-93178-55-7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miljøstyrelsen. (2019). På vej – Mod øget genanvendelse af husholdningsaffald (livscyklusvurdering og samfundsøkonomisk konsekvensvurdering).
   Google Scholar
• Miljøstyrelsen. (2020a). Affaldsstatistik 2019 (Issue Miljøprojekt nr. 2152).
   Google Scholar
• Miljøstyrelsen. (2020b). Virkemiddelkatalog for øget genanvendelse af husholdningsaffald og lignende affald fra andre kilder (Municipal Waste). https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2020/07/978-87-7038-207-6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miljøstyrelsen. (2022). Affaldssortering nytter. https://mst.dk/affald-jord/affald/affaldsfraktioner/de-ti-affaldsfraktioner/
   Google Scholar
• Miljøstyrelsen. (n.d.). Genanvend Projektbibliotek. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://genanvend.mst.dk/projekter/beholdere/
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984287
   Google Scholar
• Muneeb, S. M., Adhami, A. Y., Jalil, S. A., & Asim, Z. (2018). Decentralized bi-level decision planning model for municipal solid waste recycling and management with cost reliability under uncertain environment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming In and Out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization : an introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, D. (2010). When the lights went out: A history of blackouts in America. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8252.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pandit, A., Nakagawa, Y., Timilsina, R. R., Kotani, K., & Saijo, T. (2021). Taking the perspectives of future generations as an effective method for achieving sustainable waste management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1526–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puaschunder, J. M. (2017). Ethical decision making under social uncertainty: An introduction to Überethicality. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002a). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002b). The status of the “Material” in theories of culture: From “Social Structure” to “artefacts”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2010a). Materiality and social life. Nature and Culture, 5(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2010b). The timespace of human activity : on performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2019). Social change in a material worlds (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social [book]. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511527470
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change (Vol. 40, Issue 07) [Book]. Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-3946
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606071942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2016). Matters of practice. In E. S. Hui, & T. S. Allision (Eds.), The nexus of practices. Connection, constellation, practitioners (pp. 167–180). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816-19
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice : everyday life and how it changes. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Spurling, N. (2018). Matters of time: Materiality and the changing temporal organisation of everyday energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture 21, 146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518773818
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2003). Case studies. In Y. S. Denzin, K. Norman, & Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 134–164). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sujata, M., Khor, K. S., Ramayah, T., & Teoh, A. P. (2019). The role of social media on recycling behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (n.d.). Circular economy|UNIDO. Retrieved December 11, 2020, from https://www.unido.org/our-focus-cross-cutting-services/circular-economy
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090
   Google Scholar