Strategic visions for local sustainability transition: measuring maturity in Swedish municipalities

References

• Avelino, F. (2011). Power in transition: Empowering discourses on sustainability transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. Qualitative Report, 19(32). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damsø, T., Kjær, T., & Christensen, T. B. (2017). Implementation of local climate action plans: Copenhagen – Towards a carbon-neutral capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167(1), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.08.156.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerberg, K. (2001). Sweden problems and prospects at the leading edge of LA21 implementation. In Sustainable communities in Europe (pp. 15–40). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk för Sverige. (2017). No. 2016/17:146.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2022a). 2050 long-term strategy. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2050-long-term-strategy_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2022b). A European Green Deal [Text]. European Commission - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, P., & Gustafsson, S. (2017). Moving from high-level words to local action – Governance for urban sustainability in municipalities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27(Open issue part II), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graute, U. (2016). Local authorities acting globally for sustainable development. Regional Studies, 50(11), 1931–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1161740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2000). Vision assessment to support shaping 21 st century society? Technology assessment as a tool for political judgement. Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21 St Century Society: Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59702-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, S., & Mignon, I. (2020). Municipalities as intermediaries for the design and local implementation of climate visions. European Planning Studies, 28(6), 1161–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1612327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Janssen, M. J., Wesseling, J. H., & Negro, S. O. (2020). Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34(1), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Chea, R., Jain, A., Bocken, N. M. P., & Gurtoo, A. (2021). The business model in sustainability transitions: A conceptualization. Sustainability, 13(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Annex I: Glossary. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/sr15/sr15_glossary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2022). Global warming of 1.5°C: IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels in context of strengthening response to climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K., & Hagbert, P. (2020). Institutional capacity to integrate ‘radical’ perspectives on sustainability in small municipalities: Experiences from Sweden. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, R., & Hallencreutz, J. (2008). The measurement system resource as support for sustainable change. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 8(1), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v08i01/50493.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2006). Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development (pp. 103–130). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2004). Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, 137–167.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H., & Liljenfeldt, J. (2012). Working with sustainability: Experiences of sustainability processes in Swedish municipalities. Natural Resources Forum, 36(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2012.01442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakee, A. (2002). Assessing institutional capital building in a local agenda 21 process in Goteborg. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350220117807
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Dütschke, E., & Wittmayer, J. (2021). Introduction to ‘zooming in and out: Special issue on local transition governance’. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40(1), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., & Boons, F. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moloney, S., Fünfgeld, H., & Granberg, M. (2018). Climate change responses from the global to local scale: An overview. In Local action on climate change (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montin, S. (2007). Kommunerna och klimatpolitiken-ett exempel på tredje generationens politikområden. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 109(1).
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Purposeful sampling. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Qualitative research & evaluation methods (pp. 230–246). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Regeringskansliet. (n.d.-a). Klimatlag (2017:720). Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://lagen.nu/2017:720
   Google Scholar
• Regeringskansliet. (n.d.-b). Klimatpolitiska rådets uppdrag och behovet av en ny analysmodell. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://www.klimatpolitiskaradet.se/klimatpolitiska-radets-uppdrag-och-behovet-av-ett-nytt-analytiskt-ramverk/
   Google Scholar
• Regeringskansliet. (n.d.-c). Kommunallag (2017:725). Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://lagen.nu/2017:725
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, J., & Fudge, C. (2003). Linking national sustainable development strategy and local implementation: A case study in Sweden. Local Environment, 8(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983032000048451
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G. G. (2020). Determining a path to a destination: Pairing strategic frameworks with the sustainable development goals to promote research and policy. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 17(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-020-00162-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2010). ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy, 39(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (2015, October 21). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
   Google Scholar