34,899
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Phantom Penis: Extrapolating Neuroscience and Employing Imagination for Trans Male Sexual Embodiment

References

  • Agar, N. (2013). Truly Human Enhancement: A Philosophical Defense of Limits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Armel, K. C., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 270(1523), 1499–1506.
  • Barad, K. (2015). Transmaterialities: Trans*/matter/realities and queer political imaginings. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 387–422.
  • Bermejo-Sánchez, E., et al. (2011). Amelia: A multi-center descriptive epidemiologic study in a large dataset from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics Seminars in Medical Genetics, 157C(4), 288–304.
  • Bettcher, T. M. (2016). Intersexuality, transgender, transsexuality. In: Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, eds. L. Disch and M. Hawkesworth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 407–427.
  • Boehme, R., Hauser, S., Gerling, G. J., Heilig, M., & Olausson, H. (2019). How brains distinguish between self-touch and touch by others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 116 (6), 2290–2299. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816278116
  • Brugger, P., et al. (2000). Beyond re-membering: Phantom sensations in congenitally absent limbs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(11), 6167–6172.
  • Brugger, P., Lennggenhager, B., & Giummarra, M. J. (2013). Xenomelia: A social neuroscience view of altered bodily self-consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00204.
  • Carel, H. (2016). The Phenomenology of Illness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Case, L. K., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2012). Alternating gender incongruity: A new neuropsychiatric syndrome providing insight into the dynamic plasticity of brain sex. Medical Hypotheses, 78, 626–631.
  • Cazala, F., et al. (2015). The cortical sensory representation of genitalia in women and men: A systematic review. Socioaffective Neuroscience and Psychology, 5, 26428. Retrieved from http:/dx.doi/10.3402/snp.v5.26428
  • Chen, K.-L., et al. (2010). Bioengineered corporal tissue for structural and functional restoration of the penis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(8), 3346–3350.
  • Connell, R. (2012). Transsexual women and feminist thought: Toward new understanding and new politics. Signs, 37(4), 857–881.
  • Cotten, T. T., ed. (2012). Hung Jury: Testimonies of Genital Surgery by Transsexual Men. Oakland, CA: Transgress Press.
  • Crawford, C. (2014). Phantom Limb: Amputation, Embodiment, and Prosthetic Technology. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Crowther, P. (2013). How images create us: Imagination and the unity of self-consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(11–12), 101–123.
  • Doetsch, G. S. (1997). Progressive changes in cutaneous trigger zones for sensation referred to a phantom hand: A case report and review with implications for cortical reorganization. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 14, 6–16.
  • Doorduin, T., & van Berlo, W. (2014). Trans People’s experience of sexuality in the Netherlands: A pilot study. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(5), 654–672.
  • Doria-Medina, R., et al. (2017). fMRI after phalloplasty with nerve anastomosis in a trans-man patient. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 5(6), e1353–e1353.
  • Edelman, E. A. (2015). The cum shot: Trans men and visual economics of ejaculation. Porn Studies, 2(2–3), 150–160.
  • Feinberg, L. (1996) Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul. Boston MA: Beacon Press.
  • Fisher, C. M. (1999). Phantom erection after amputation of penis: Case description and review of the relevant literature on phantoms. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 26(1), 53–56.
  • Flor, H., et al. (1998). Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 205–212.
  • Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia. Standard Edition, 14, 243–258.
  • Frey, J. D., Poudrier, G., Chiodo, M. V., & Hazen, A. (2016). A systematic review of metoidiplasty and radial forearm flap phalloplasty in female-to-male transgender genital reconstruction: Is the ‘idea’ neophallus an achievable goal? Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 138 (6), PRS Global Open, doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001131.
  • Gallagher, S., et al. (1998). Hand–mouth coordination, congenital absence of limb, and evidence for innate body schemas. Brain and Cognition, 38, 53–65.
  • Gallese, V. (2011). Beyond art … Liberated embodied simulation in aesthetic experience. In: Seeing with Eyes Closed, eds. A. Abbushi, I. Franke, and I. Mornrnenejad. Berlin, Germany: Association of Neuroesthetics, pp. 62–65.
  • Gallese, V. (2016). Bodily framing. In: Experience: Culture, Cognition, and the Common Sense, eds. C. Jones, D. Mather, and R. Uchill. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 237–247.
  • Gallese, V., & Ebisch, S. (2013). Embodied simulation and touch: The sense of touch in social cognition. Phenomenology & Mind, 4, 269–291.
  • Georgiadis, J. R., et al. (2009). Men versus women on sexual brain function: Prominent difference during tactile genital stimulation, but not during orgasm. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3089–3101.
  • Gilbert, D. A., et al. (1988). Phallic reinnervation via the pudendal nerve. Journal of Urology 140, 295–299.
  • Gottlieb, L. J. (2018). Radial forearm. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 45, 391–398.
  • Hahamy, A. et al. (2017). Representation of multiple body parts in the missing-hand territory of congenital one-handers. Current Biology, 27, 1350–1355.
  • Halata, Z., and Munger, B. L. (1986). The neuroanatomical basis for the protopathic sensibility of the human glans penis. Brain Research, 371, 205–230.
  • Heller-Roazen, D. (2007). The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Press.
  • Heusner, A. P. (1950). Phantom genitalia. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 51, 128–131.
  • Inui, N. (2016). Systematic Changes in Body Image Following Formation of Phantom Limbs. Singapore: Springer.
  • Irwig, M. S. (2017). Testosterone therapy for transgender men. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology, 5, 301–311.
  • James, W. (1887). The consciousness of lost limbs. Proceedings of the American Society for Psychical Research, 1, 249–258. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/lostlimbs.htm
  • Johnson, A. H. (2015). Normative accountability: How the medical model influences transgender identities and experiences. Sociology Compass, 9(9), 803–813.
  • Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2009). Expanding the mirror: Vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 666–671.
  • Kime, P. (2016). Lab grown testicles give new hope to wounded vets. Military News, January 31. Retrieved from www.militarytimes.com/story/military/benefits/health-care/2016/01/31/lab-grown-testicles-give-new-hope-to-wounded-combat-veterans/79318196
  • Komisaruk, B. R., Beyer-Flores, C., and Whipple, B. (2006). The Science of Orgasm. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Kreukels, B. P. C., & Guillamon, A. (2016). Neuroimaging studies in people with gender incongruence. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 120–128. doi:10.3109/09540261.2015.1113163.
  • Lane, R. (2009). Trans as bodily becoming: Rethinking the biological as diversity, not dichotomy. Hypatia, 24(3), 136–157.
  • Langer, S. J. (2016). Trans bodies and the failure of mirrors. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 17(4), 306–316.
  • Langer, S. J. (2019). Theorizing Transgender Identity for Clinical Practice. London UK: Jessica Kingley Publisher.
  • Longo, M. .R., Azañon, E., & Haggard, P. (2010). More than skin deep: Body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 48, 655–668.
  • Lotze, M., et al. (1999). Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 501–502.
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (1998–2019). Patient Care & Health Information, Tests & Procedures for Masculinizing Surgery. Retrieved from https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/masculinizing-surgery/about/pac-20385105
  • McGinn, C. (2004). Mindsight: Image, Dream, Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Melzack, R. (1989). Phantom limb, the self, and the brain. Canadian Psychology, 30, 1–13.
  • Melzack, R., et al. (1997). Phantom limbs in people with congenital limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. Brain, 120, 1603–1620.
  • Mitchell, S. W. (1871). Phantom limbs. Lippincott’s Magazine, 8, 563–569.
  • Mitchell, S. W. (1872). Injuries of the Nerves and their Consequences. Philadelphia, PA: J. P. Lippincott.
  • Namba, Y., et al. (2008). Phantom erectile penis after sex reassignment surgery. Acta Medica Okayama, 62(3), 213–216.
  • Penfield, W., & Rasmussen, T. (1968). The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of Localization of Function. New York, NY: Hafner.
  • Pitts-Taylor, V. (2016). The Brain’s Body: Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Price, D. B., & Twombly, N. J. (1978). The Phantom Limb Phenomenon: A Medical, Folkloric, and Historical Study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Prosser, J. (1998). Second Skins: the Body Narratives of Transsexuality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Pünse, G., et al. (2010). Phantom testis syndrome: Prevalence, phenomenology and putative mechanisms. International Journal of Andrology, 33(1), e216–e220. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00994.x
  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs: The D.O. Bebb lecture. Brain, 121(9), 1603–1630.
  • Ramachandran, V. S., and McGeoch, P. D. (2008). Phantom penises in transsexuals: Evidence of an innate body image in the brain. Journal of Consciousness Study, 15(1), 5–16.
  • Ramachandran, V.S., & Blakeslee, S. (1999). Phantoms in the Brain. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Rubin, J. (1998). Phenomenology as method in trans studies. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 4(2), 263–281.
  • Sacks, O. (1984). A Leg to Stand On. New York, NY: Summit Books.
  • Sacks, O. (2017). A River of Consciousness. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Schechter, L. S., & Safa, B., eds. (2018). Gender Confirmation Surgery. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, Vol. 45-3. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
  • Schilder, P. (1950). The phantom. In: The Image and Appearance of the Human Body. New York, NY: International Universities Press, pp. 63–70.
  • Scott, K.-L. (2015). Orgasms without bodies. world picture 10.
  • Selvaggi, G., et al. (2007). Genital sensitivity after sex reassignment surgery in transsexual patients. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 58(4), 427–433.
  • Selvaggi, G. (2018). Email correspondence with author. November, 24, 2018.
  • Sherman, R. A., and Sherman, C. J. (1983). Prevalence and characteristics of chronic phantom limb pain among American veterans. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 62(5), 227–238.
  • Sherman, R. A., and Sherman, C. J. (1985). A comparison of phantom sensations among amputees whose amputations were of civilian and military origins. Pain, 21, 91–97.
  • Shih, C., Cold, C. J., and Yang, C. C. (2013). Cutaneous corpuscular receptors of the human glans clitoris: Descriptive characteristics and comparison with the glans penis. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 1783–1789.
  • Sobchack, V. (2010). Living a ‘phantom limb’: On the phenomenology of bodily integrity. Body & Society, 16(3), 51–67.
  • Stone, S. (2006). The Empire strikes back: A posttranssexual manifesto. In: The Transgender Studies Reader, S. Stryker & S. Whittle, eds. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 221–235. Originally published 1991.
  • Straayer, C. (2018). Penile Transplants in a Trans Male Context. Paper presented to the Working Group on Gender, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  • Straayer, C. (2020). “Trans men’s stealth aesthetics: navigating penile prosthetics and ‘gender fraud.’” Journal of Visual Culture 19.2, 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412920946827
  • Sunderland, S. (1978). Nerves and Nerve Conditions, 2nd Ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Taghipour, M., et al. (2018). Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens: High hopes for stimulating orgasm in spinal cord injury patients. World Neurosurgery, 116, 492–493.
  • Transthetics. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.transthetics.com
  • Tremere, L. A., Pinaud, R., & De Weerd, P. (2003). Contributions of inhibitory mechanisms to perceptual completion and cortical reorganization. In: Filling-In: From Perceptual Completion to Cortical Reorganization, L. Pessoa and P. De Weerd, eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 295–322.
  • Turnbull, O. H., et al. (2014). Reports of intimate touch: Erogenous zones and somatosensory cortical organization. Cortex, 53, 146–154.
  • Van de Grift, T. C., et al. (2019). Transmen’s experienced sexuality and genital gender-affirming surgery: Findings from a clinical follow-up study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 45(3), 201–205.
  • Wade, N. J., and Finger, S. (2010). Phantom penis: Historical dimensions. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 19, 299–312.
  • Weinstein, S., & Sersen, E. A. (1961). Phantoms in cases of congenital absence of limbs.” Neurology, 11(10), 905–911.
  • Wilson, F. R. (1998). The Hand: How Its Use Shapes the Brain, Language, and Human Culture. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Yakovlev, P. I. (1950). Discussion of Heusner, A. Price, “Phantom Genitalia.” Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 51, 131–134.
  • Zimman, L. (2014). The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. In: Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, ed. L. Zimman et al. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.