Relations Among Early Object Recognition Skills: Objects and Letters

REFERENCES

• Augustine, E., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (2011). Parts and relations in young children's shape-based object recognition. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 556–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of objects and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 352, 1203–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., & Adams, C. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, P., Borgwaldt, S. R., & Jakab, E. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language and Literacy, 12, 116–139.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R., & Hocevar, D. J. (1975). A new distinctive feature theory for upper case letters. Journal of General Psychology, 93, 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. L., & Connor, C. E. (2004). Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 880–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hénaff, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: A role for associative learning. Psychological Review, 112, 347–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzet, S. M., & Serre, T. (2011). What are the visual features underlying rapid object recognition? Frontiers in Psychology, 2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00326
   Google Scholar
• Doumas, L. A., & Hummel, J. E. (2010). A computational account of the development of the generalization of shape information. Cognitive Science, 34, 698–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., … Reilly, J. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129–155.
   Google Scholar
• Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Smith, L. B. (2004). Shape and the first hundred words. Child Development, 75, 1098–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Croft.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J., Gibson, J. J., Pick, A. D., & Osser, H. (1962). A developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 897–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G. (2003). After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 425–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E. (2000). Where view-based theories break down: The role of structure in shape perception and object recognition. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 157–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N. (1994). Children's theories of word meaning: The role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9, 45–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K. H., & Atwood, T. P. (2009). The role of sensorimotor learning in the perception of letter-like forms: Tracking the causes of neural specialization for letters. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 91–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K. H., & Gauthier, I. (2006). Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory-motor brain network. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2937–2949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K. H., James, T. W., Jobard, G., Wong, A. C.-N., & Gauthier, I. (2005). Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 452–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, T. W., Huh, E., & Kim, S. (2010). Temporal and spatial integration of face, object, and scene features in occipito-temporal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 74, 112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (1993). The place of perception in children's concepts. Cognitive Development, 8, 113–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science, 5, 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (2005). Object name learning and object perception: A deficit in late talkers. Journal of Child Language, 32, 223–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüttner, M., Müller, A., & Rentschler, I. (2006). A developmental dissociation of view-dependent and view-invariant object recognition in adolescence. Behavioral Brain Research, 175, 420–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanwisher, N. (2010). Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 11163–11170. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1005062107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Konen, C. S., & Kastner, S. (2008). Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanthier, S. N., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2009). Not all visual features are created equal: Early processing in letter and word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B. Biological Sciences, 200, 269–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mash, C. (2006). Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 128–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., & Wallis, J. D. (2003). Neural correlates of categories and concepts. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 198–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peissig, J. J., & Tarr, M. J. (2007). Visual object recognition: Do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 75–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, A., & Smith, L. B. (2009). Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age. Developmental Science, 12, 67–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakison, D. H., & Butterworth, G. E. (1998). Infants' use of object parts in early categorization. Developmental Psychology, 34, 49–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B. C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Letter processing in reading and spelling. Some disassociations. Reading and Writing, 1(1), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Reitsma, P. (1978). Changes in letter processing in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 315–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, L. (2002). Language and reading outcomes to age 9 in late talking toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 360–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2002). Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category organization and syntax correspond? Cognition, 73, 1–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (2009). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In F. Fletcher-Campbell, G. Reid, & J. M. Soler (Eds.), Approaching difficulties in literacy development: Assessment, pedagogy and programmes (pp. 23–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B. (1999). Children's noun learning: How general learning processes make specialized learning mechanisms. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 277–303). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B. (2003). Learning to recognize objects. Psychological Science, 14, 244–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B. (2009). From fragments to geometric shape: Changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 290–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (2011). Symbolic play connects to language through visual object recognition. Developmental Science, 14, 1142–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13, 13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38, 179–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. Y., Smith, L. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations. Cognition, 108, 626–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E., Lee, S. A., & Izard, V. (2010). Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry. Cognitive Science, 34, 863–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A., Sheppard, J., Davidson, M. M., & Browning, M. M. (2001). Prediction of first-graders' growth in oral reading fluency using kindergarten letter fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 225–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Cheng, Y. D. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Pollo, T. C. (2006). Learning about the letter name subset of vocabulary: Evidence from US and Brazilian preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 211–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255(5), 114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, S. (2007). Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanrie, J., Willems, B., & Wagemans, J. (2001). Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: Mental rotation versus invariant features. Perception, 30, 1047–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden, P. E., & Boettcher, W. (1990). Young children's acquisition of alphabet knowledge. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, M., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (2012). Representing object shape and the development of the shape bias. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 3, 533. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar