Young children’s learning and generalization of teleological and mechanistic explanations

References

• Baum, L. A., Danovitch, J. H., & Keil, F. C. (2008). Children’s sensitivity to circular explanations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 146–155. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonawitz, E. B., Shafto, P., Yu, Y., Bridgers, S., & Gonzalez, A. (2018). Children rationally change their beliefs in response to neutral follow-up questions. Reviewed draft.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary foundations of religious belief. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler, K., & Kelemen, D. (2008). Developmental continuity in teleo-functional explanation: Reasoning about nature among Romanian Romani adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9, 340–362. doi:10.1080/15248370802248556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesendruck, G., & Haber, L. (2009). God’s categories: The effect of religiosity on children’s teleological and essentialist beliefs about categories. Cognition, 110, 100–114. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2009). Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult–child conversation. Child Development, 80, 1592–1611. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01356.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A., Shafto, P., Bonawitz, E., & Gopnik, A. (2012, August 1–4). Is that your final answer? The effects of neutral queries on children’s choices. (N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. Cooper, Eds.). Proceedings of the thirty-fourth cognitive science society (pp. 1614–1619), Sapporo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, M., Kemler-Nelson, D., Keil, F. C., & Gutierrez, F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science, 17, 455–459. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01727.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalish, M. L., Griffiths, T. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2007). Iterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 288–294. doi:10.3758/BF03194066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (1992). The origins of an autonomous biology. In M. R. Gunnar & M. Maratsos (Eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Vol. 25. Modularity and constraints in language and cognition (pp. 103–137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234–254). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. (2006). Explanation and understanding. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 227–254. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999a). Beliefs about purpose: On the origins of teleological thought. In M. C. Corballis & S. Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind (pp. 278–294). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999b). Functions, goals and intentions: Children’s teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 461–468. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01402-3
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999c). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–272. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00010-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999d). Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440–1453. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2003). British and American children’s preferences for teleological-functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition, 88, 201–221. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00024-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., Callanan, M., Casler, K., & Pérez-Granados, D. R. (2005). Why things happen: Teleological explanation in parent–child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 251–264. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & DiYanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 3–31. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138–143. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1074–1083. doi:10.1037/a0030399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linenthal, P. (1998). Look look! New York, NY: Dutton Children’s Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. (2006). The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 464–470. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. (2012). Explanation and abductive inference. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 260–276). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. (2016). Explanatory preferences shape learning and inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 748–759. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T., & Carey, S. (2006). Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition, 99, 167–204. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T., Kelemen, D., & Zaitchik, D. (2007). Inferring design: Evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychological Science, 18, 999–1006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02015.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojalheto, B., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2013). Teleological reasoning about nature: Intentional design or relational perspectives? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 166–171. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Seston Schillaci, R., Clark, K. J., & Kelemen, D. (2017). Cultural influences on the teleological stance: Evidence from China. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7, 17–26. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2015.1118402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Tapia, I., Gelman, S. A., Hollander, M. A., Manczak, E. M., Mannheim, B., & Escalante, C. (2016). Development of teleological explanations in Peruvian Quechua‐speaking and US English‐speaking preschoolers and adults. Child Development, 87, 747–758. doi:10.1111/cdev.12497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sully, J. (1900). Studies of childhood. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Company.
   Google Scholar