The developing mind in action: measuring manual dynamics in childhood

References

• Adolph, K. E., & Robinson, S. R. (2015). Motor development. In R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.), L. Liben, & U. Muller (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes (7th ed., pp. 114–157). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Anzulewicz, A., Sobota, K., & Delafield-Butt, J. T. (2016). Toward the Autism Motor Signature: Gesture patterns during smart tablet gameplay identify children with autism. Scientific Reports, 6, 31107. doi:10.1038/srep31107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargill, S. A., Farmer, T. A., Schwade, J. A., Goldstein, M. H., & Spivey, M. J. (2007, January). Children’s online processing of complex sentences: New evidence from a new technique. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 29(29), 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Cisek, P. (1999). Beyond the computer metaphor: Behaviour as interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 125–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2010). Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 269–298. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, R. K., Rochat, P., Robin, D. J., & Berthier, N. E. (1994). Multimodal perception in the control of infant reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 876–886. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, D., Guan, Y., & Williams, J. L. (2012). Infant eye‐tracking in the context of goal‐directed actions. Infancy, 17, 102–125. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00093.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., Light, J. C., & Newell, K. M. (2012). Factors affecting computer mouse use for young children: Implications for AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 85–95. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.679235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, R., & Duran, N. D. (2011). The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. Cognitive Science, 35, 983–996. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01164.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donker, A., & Reitsma, P. (2007). Young children’s ability to use a computer mouse. Computers & Education, 48, 602–617. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2013). How do we convert a number into a finger trajectory? Cognition, 129, 512–529. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, C. D., Moher, J., Sobel, D. M., & Song, J.-H. (2016). Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying cognitive control. Cognition, 152, 114–126. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, C. D., Moher, J., Song, J.-H., & Sobel, D. M. (2017a). Cognitive control in action: Tracking the dynamics of rule switching in 5- to 8-year-olds and adults. Cognition, 164, 163–173. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, C. D., Moher, J., Song, J.-H., & Sobel, D. M. (2017b). Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying inhibitory control in 5- to 10-year-olds and adults. Developmental Science. doi:10.1111/desc.12523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, C. D., Moher, J., Song, J.-H., & Sobel, D. M. (2018). Numerical cognition in action: Reaching behavior reveals numerical distance effects in 5- to 6-year-olds. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. A., Cargill, S. A., Hindy, N. C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Tracking the continuity of language comprehension: Computer mouse trajectories suggest parallel syntactic processing. Cognitive Science, 31, 889–909. doi:10.1080/03640210701530797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkenberry, T. J., Montgomery, S. A., & Tennes, S. A. N. (2015). Response trajectories reveal the temporal dynamics of fraction representations. Acta Psychologica, 159, 100–107. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkenberry, T. J., & Rey, A. E. (2014). Extending the reach of mousetracking in numerical cognition: A comment on Fischer and Hartmann (2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1436. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., & Hartmann, M. (2014). Pushing forward in embodied cognition: May we mouse the mathematical mind? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1315. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 1183–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02422.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226–241. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011a). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279. doi:10.1037/a0022327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011b). When two become one: Temporally dynamic integration of the face and voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 259–263. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 59. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 362–374. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., Ma, Y., Han, S., & Ambady, N. (2013). Influences of culture and visual context on real-time social categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 206–210. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., Pauker, K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2016). A perceptual pathway to bias: Interracial exposure reduces abrupt shifts in real-time race perception that predict mixed-race bias. Psychological Science, 27, 502–517. doi:10.1177/0956797615627418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallivan, J. P., & Chapman, C. S. (2014). Three-dimensional reach trajectories as a probe of real-time decision-making between multiple competing targets. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 215. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, C. M., & Song, J.-H. (2017). Dynamic modulation of illusory and physical target size on separate and coordinated eye and hand movements. Journal of Vision, 17, 23. doi:10.1167/17.3.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, G. M., Vercher, J. L., Ivaldi, F. M., & Marchetti, E. (1988). Oculo-manual tracking of visual targets: Control learning, coordination control and coordination model. Experimental Brain Research, 73, 127–137. doi:10.1007/BF00279667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Mind as computer: Birth of a metaphor. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 131–144. doi:10.1080/10400419.1996.9651168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Spaepen, E., Gibson, D., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2015). Gesture as a window onto children’s number knowledge. Cognition, 144, 14–28. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermens, F. (2018). When do arrows start to compete? A developmental mouse-tracking study. Acta Psychologica, 182, 177–188. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner, R., Messer, D., Light, P., & Littleton, K. (1998). It is best to point for young children: A comparison of children’s pointing and dragging. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 513–529. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00021-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontra, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 731–739. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Stolze, H., Jöhnk, K., Boczek-Funcke, A., & Illert, M. (1998). Development of prehension movements in children: A kinematic study. Experimental Brain Research, 122, 424–432. doi:10.1007/s002210050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, A. E., & Ziviani, J. M. (2010). Factors influencing skilled use of the computer mouse by school-aged children. Computers & Education, 55, 1112–1122. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marghetis, T., Núñez, R., & Bergen, B. K. (2014). Doing arithmetic by hand: Hand movements during exact arithmetic reveal systematic, dynamic spatial processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1579–1596. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.897359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Times required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520. doi:10.1038/2151519a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack, M. A., Congdon, E. L., Hemani-Lopez, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). From action to abstraction: Using the hands to learn math. Psychological Science, 25, 903–910. doi:10.1177/0956797613518351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M. (2017). The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–10. doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1303522
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Rakison, D. H., & Woodward, A. L. (2008). New perspectives on the effects of action on perceptual and cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1209–1213. doi:10.1037/a0012999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santens, S., Goossens, S., & Verguts, T. (2011). Distance in motion: Response trajectories reveal the dynamics of number comparison. PLoS One, 6, e25429. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, S., Dshemuchadse, M., Fischer, R., & Goschke, T. (2010). How decisions evolve: The temporal dynamics of action selection. Cognition, 115, 407–416. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiberg, S., Sveistrup, H., McFadyen, B., McKinley, P., & Levin, M. F. (2002). The development of coordination for reach-to-grasp movements in children. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 142–154. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1156-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79, 217–240. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L., & Gasser, M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13–29. doi:10.1162/1064546053278973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J.-H. (2017). Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 20160195. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Numeric comparison in a visually-guided manual reaching task. Cognition, 106, 994–1003. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 360–366. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M. S. C., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (2009). Toward a unified theory of development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393–10398. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503903102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., Kamm, K., Spencer, J. P., Schneider, K., & Zernicke, R. F. (1993). The transition to reaching: Mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. Child Development, 64, 1058–1098. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04188.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. M., Bailey, T. M., & Bott, L. (2013). Possibly all of that and then some: Scalar implicatures are understood in two steps. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 18–35. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazo, P. D., Anderson, J. E., Richler, J., Wallner-Allen, K., Beaumont, J. L., & Weintraub, S. (2013). NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Measuring executive function and attention. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(4), 16–33. doi:10.1111/mono.12032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar