Individual Differences in Early Scientific Thinking: Assessment, Cognitive Influences, and Their Relevance for Science Learning

References

• Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K‐2 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32, 97–124. doi:10.1080/09500690902717283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsel, E., Klaczynski, P. A., Johnston, A., Bench, S., Close, J., Sadler, E., & Walker, R. (2008). A dual-process account of the development of scientific reasoning: The nature and development of metacognitive intercession skills. Cognitive Development, 23, 452–471. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders, Y., Hardy, I., Pauen, S., & Steffensky, M. (2017). Goals of early science education between the ages of three and six and their assessment. In “Haus der kleinen Forscher” Foundation (Ed.), Early science education – Goals and process-related quality criteria for science teaching. Scientific studies on the work of the “Haus der kleinen Forscher” Foundation (Vol. 5, pp. 30–99) Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Astington, J. W., Pelletier, J., & Homer, B. (2002). Theory of mind and epistemological development: The relation between children’s second-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 131–144. doi:10.1016/S0732-118X(02)00005-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, M., Sodian, B., & Koerber, S. (2009). Doing experiments and understanding science: Development of scientific reasoning from childhood to adulthood. In W. Schneider & M. Bullock (Eds.), Human development from early childhood to early adulthood. Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study (pp. 173–197). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, M., & Ziegler, A. (1999). Scientific reasoning: Developmental and individual differences. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12. Findings from the munich longitudinal study (pp. 38–54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works. A study of junior high school students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514–529. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. S. (1963). Culture fair intelligence test. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098–1120. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49. doi:10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelsbrunner, P. A., Schalk, L., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2015). Pathways of conceptual change: Investigating the influence of experimentation skills on conceptual knowledge development in early science education. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Pasadena, CA, 620 (Vol. 625).
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337, 1623–1627. doi:10.1126/science.1223416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grob, A., Meyer, C. S., & Hagmann-von Arx, P. (2009). Intelligenz- und Entwicklungsskalen (IDS). [Intelligence and Development Scales]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Wang, S., Hall, A. H., Breit-Smith, A., & Busch, J. (2016). The effects of science instruction on young children’s vocabulary learning: A research synthesis. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 359–367. doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0721-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154. doi:10.1007/BF02172093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kastner-Koller, U., & Deimann, P. (1998). Wiener Entwicklungstest (WET) [Vienna Development Test]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1–48. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., Mayer, D., Osterhaus, C., Schwippert, K., & Sodian, B. (2015). The development of scientific thinking in elementary school: A comprehensive inventory. Child Development, 86, 327–336. doi:10.1111/cdev.12298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., Osterhaus, C., & Sodian, B. (2015). Testing primary-school children’s understanding of the nature of science. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 57–71. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Osterhaus, C., Mayer, D., Kropf, N., & Schwippert, K. (2017). Science-P.II. Modeling scientific reasoning in primary school. In D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education: Research, models and instruments (pp. 19–29). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children. Preschoolers’ ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 141–152. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropf, N. (2010). Entwicklung und Analyse von Messinstrumenten zur Erfassung des wissenschaftlichen Denkens im Grundschulalter [Development and analysis of instruments for the measurement of scientific reasoning in elementary school] ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). München, Germany: LMU München.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2011). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 497–523). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O’Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., Andersen, C., White, S. H., Klahr, D., & Carver, S. M. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60, i–157. doi:10.2307/1166059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Phelps, E. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 2–44). New, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60356-0
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddle, B., & Nettle, D. (2006). Higher-order theory of mind and social competence in school-age children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 231–244. doi:10.1556/JCEP.4.2006.3–4.3
   Google Scholar
• Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2013). Science literacy in school and home contexts: Kindergarteners’ science achievement and motivation. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 62–119. doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.742087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, D., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Schwippert, K. (2014). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities. Learning & Instruction, 29, 43–55. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. A. (2009). Children’s understanding of second-order mental states. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 749–773. doi:10.1037/a0016854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45, 18–35. doi:10.3102/0013189X16633182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, B. J., Croker, S., Masnick, A. M., & Zimmerman, C. (2012). The emergence of scientific reasoning. In H. Kloos, B. J. Morris, & J. L. Amaral (Eds.), Current topics in children’s learning and cognition (pp. 61–82). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Counsil. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2015). Children’s understanding of experimental contrast and experimental control: An inventory for primary school. Frontline Learning Research, 3(4), 56–94. doi:10.14786/flr.v3i4.220
   Google Scholar
• Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2016). Scaling of advanced theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development., 87, 1971–1991. doi:10.1111/cdev.12566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2017). Scientific thinking in elementary school: Children’s social cognition and their epistemological understanding promote experimentation skills. Developmental Psychology, 53, 450–462. doi:10.1037/dev0000260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahnke, J., & Rösner, P. (2012). Frühe MINT-Bildung für alle Kinder–Die Initiative „Haus der kleinen Forscher “[Early MINT education for all children- the initiative „the litte children’s house“]. In U. Pfenning & O. Renn (Eds.), Wissenschafts-und Technikbildung auf dem Prüfstand (pp. 233–246). Baden Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Perner, J. (1988). Higher-order beliefs and intentions in children’s understanding of social interaction. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 271–294). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piekny, J., Grube, D., & Maehler, C. (2013). The relation between preschool children’s false-belief understanding and domain-general experimentation skills. Metacognition and Learning, 8, 103–119. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9097-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekny, J., & Maehler, C. (2013). Scientific reasoning in early and middle childhood: The development of domain general evidence evaluation, experimentation, and hypothesis generation skills. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 153–179. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02082.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekny, J., Thomsen, T., Schuchardt, K., Lessing, N., Greve, W., & Mähler, C. (2017). Kognitive Kompetenzen und kognitive Bewältigungsstrategien im Vor-und Grundschulalter [Cognitive competencies and cognitive coping strategies in pre- and elementary school age.]. Kindheit Und Entwicklung, 26(28–38). doi:10.1026/0942-5403/a000214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollmeier, J., Tröbst, S., Hardy, I., Möller, K., Kleickmann, T., Jurecka, A., & Schwippert, K. (2017). Science-P I: Modeling conceptual understanding in primary school. In D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education (pp. 9–17). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R., & Doherty, M. (1993). Reflecting on scientific thinking: Children’s understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. Child Development, 64, 1617–1636. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04203.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & French, B. (2009). The development and validation of the science learning assessment (SLA): A measure of kindergarten science learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 502–535. doi:10.1177/1932202X0902000306
   Google Scholar
• Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2011). What kindergarten students learn in inquiry-based science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 416–470. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.608027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology, 32, 102–119. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1045–1050. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. M., Erb, C. D., Tassin, T., & Weisberg, D. S. (2017). The development of diagnostic inference about uncertain causes. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18, 556–576. doi:10.1080/15248372.2017.1387117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodian, B., & Bullock, M. (2008). Scientific reasoning – Where are we now? Cognitive Development, 23, 431–434. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., Kircher, E., Grygier, P., & Günther, J. (2002). Vermittlung von Wissenschaftsverständnis in der Grundschule [Teaching understanding the nature of science in elementary school]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik, 45(Supplement), 192–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children’s differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753–766. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01567.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761–784. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 255–281. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensky, M., Lankes, E. M., Carstensen, C. H., & Nölke, C. (2012). Alltagssituationen und Experimente: Was sind geeignete naturwissenschaftliche Lerngelegenheiten für Kindergartenkinder? [Everydaysituations and experiments: What are suitable learning opportunities for children?]. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 15, 37–54. doi:10.1007/s11618-012-0262-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Härtig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: The influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40, 1812–1831. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1504346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K., Zaitchik, D., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1994). Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 395–402. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Scientific reasoning abilities in kindergarten: Dynamic assessment of the control of variables strategy. Instructional Science, 43, 381–400. doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9344-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Scientific reasoning in kindergarten: Cognitive factors in experimentation and evidence evaluation. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 190–200. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 381–419. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkening, F., & Sodian, B. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children: Introduction. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 137–139. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2007). ACER ConQuest version 2.0: Generalised item response modelling software. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific-thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172–223. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar