References
- Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2012). Grasping the pain: Motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1627–1639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.001
- Assaiante, C., Barlaam, F., Cignetti, F., & Vaugoyeau, M. (2014). Body schema building during childhood and adolescence: A neurosensory approach. Clinical Neurophysiology, 44(1), 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2013.10.125
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Berk, R., … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
- Borghi, A. M., Bonfiglioli, C., Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2007). Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with Hand Primes. Neuroscience Letters, 411(1), 17–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.003
- Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 763–773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.029
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophsycis Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
- Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & van Mook, H. (2018). Switching between lift and use grasp actions. Cognition, 174, 28–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.013
- Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
- Buxbaum, L. J., & Kalénine, S. (2010). Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191(1), 201–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05447.x
- Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., … Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01
- Choudhury, S., Charman, T., Bird, V., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2007). Development of action representation during adolescence. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 255–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.010
- Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585–1599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2054
- Collette, C., Bonnotte, I., Jacquemont, C., Kalénine, S., & Bartolo, A. (2016). The development of object function and manipulation knowledge: Evidence from a semantic priming study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(AUG), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01239
- Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207(1–2), 95–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8
- Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 121–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15248371003699969
- Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006
- Dekker, T. M., Mareschal, D., Johnson, M. H., & Sereno, M. I. (2014). Picturing words? Sensorimotor cortex activation for printed words in child and adult readers. Brain and Language, 139, 58–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.009
- Engelen, J. A., Bouwmeester, S., de Bruin, A. B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 659–675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.009
- Erb, C. D., & Marcovitch, S. (2019). Tracking the within-trial, cross-trial, and developmental dynamics of cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Child Development, 90(6), e831–e848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13111
- Ferri, F., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Costantini, M. (2011). Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 3519–3524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.001
- Gabbard, C., Cordova, A., & Ammar, D. (2007). Estimation of reach in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: A developmental view. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32(3), 749–756. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640701539451
- Godard, M., Wamain, Y., & Kalénine, S. (2019). Do manufactured and natural objects evoke similar motor information? The case of action priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(12), 2801–2806. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819862210
- Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 121(4), 480–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
- Hämmerer, D., Müller, V., & Li, S. C. (2014). Performance monitoring across the lifespan: Still maturing post-conflict regulation in children and declining task-set monitoring in older adults. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46(P1), 105–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.008
- Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 189–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
- Jax, S. A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition, 115(2), 350–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.004
- Jax, S. A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2013). Response interference between functional and structural object-related actions is increased in patients with ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 7(1), 12–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-6653.2012.02031.x
- Kalénine, S., Bonthoux, F., & Borghi, A. M. (2009). How action and context priming influence categorization: A developmental study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 717–730. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X369928
- Kalénine, S., Shapiro, A. D., Flumini, A., Borghi, A. M., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2014). Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 645–651. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0536-7
- Kalénine, S., Wamain, Y., Decroix, J., & Coello, Y. (2016). Conflict between object structural and functional affordances in peripersonal space. Cognition, 155, 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.006
- Laakso, A. (2011). Embodiment and development in cognitive science. Cogn. Brain Behav, 15, 409–425.
- Liuzza, M. T., Setti, A., & Borghi, A. M. (2012). Kids observing other kids’ hands: Visuomotor priming in children. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 383–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.015
- Loeffler, J., Raab, M., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2016). A lifespan perspective on embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 845. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00845
- Martel, M., Cardinali, L., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2016). Tool-use: An open window into body representation and its plasticity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(1–2), 82‐101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1167678
- Matheson, H. E., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). Embodiment and grounding in cognitive neuroscience. In J. Wixted, E. Phelps, L. Davachi, J. Serences, S. Ghetti, S. Thompson-Schill, and E. J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), The Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (Vols. 3, 1-32, 4th ed., pp. 1–27). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Online publication.
- McShane, B. B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C., & Tackett, J. L. (2019). Abandon statistical significance. American Statistician, 73(sup1), 235–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1527253
- Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
- Mounoud, P., Duscherer, K., Moy, G., & Perraudin, S. (2007). The influence of action perception on object recognition: A developmental study. Developmental Science, 10(6), 836–852. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00624.x
- Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
- Pexman, P. M. (2019). The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1274–1283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1303522
- Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: Norton & Co.
- Schubotz, R. I., Wurm, M. F., Wittmann, M. K., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2014). Objects tell us what action we can expect: Dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00636
- Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 174–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027448
- Smith, L. B. (2005a). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25(3–4), 278–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.001
- Smith, L. B. (2005b). Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 665–679. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_13
- Thill, S., Caligiore, D., Borghi, A. M., Ziemke, T., & Baldassarre, G. (2013). Theories and computational models of affordance and mirror systems: An integrative review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(3), 491–521.
- Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 493–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193875
- van Elk, M., van Schie, H., & Bekkering, H. (2014). Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(2), 220–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.005
- Wamain, Y., Gabrielli, F., & Coello, Y. (2016). EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent. Cortex, 74, 20–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.006
- Wamain, Y., Sahaï, A., Decroix, J., Coello, Y., & Kalénine, S. (2018). Conflict between gesture representations extinguishes μ rhythm desynchronization during manipulable object perception: An EEG study. Biological Psychology, 132(June 2017), 202–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.004
- Watson, C. E., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2015). A distributed network critical for selecting among tool- directed actions christine. Cortex, 65, 65–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.007
- Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). The influence of bodily experience on children’s language processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(3), 425–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12092
- Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
- Wokke, M. E., Knot, S. L., Fouad, A., & Richard Ridderinkhof, K. (2016). Conflict in the kitchen: Contextual modulation of responsiveness to affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 141–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.007
- Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., & Zhang, D. (2011). FSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 20(8), 2378–2386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730