125
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Articles

Making Sense of Data: Identifying Children’s Strategies for Data Comparisons

, &

References

  • Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.127
  • Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 122–131. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003
  • Arena, D. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Experience and explanation: Using videogames to prepare students for formal instruction in statistics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 538–548. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9483-3
  • Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12(2), 157–162. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00327
  • Bjorklund, D. F., Coyle, T. R., & Gaultney, J. F. (1992). Developmental differences in the acquisition and maintenance of an organizational strategy: Evidence for the utilization deficiency hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54(3), 434–448.
  • Bonny, J. W., & Lourenco, S. F. (2013). The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: Evidence from the preschool years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 375–388.
  • Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2004). Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development. Developmental Review, 24(4), 396–439. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.005
  • Buckley, P. B., & Gillman, C. B. (1974). Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(6), 1131–1136.
  • Carr, M., & Alexeev, N. (2011). Fluency, accuracy, and gender predict developmental trajectories of arithmetic strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 617. doi:10.1037/a0023864
  • Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (2008). Remote transfer of scientific-reasoning and problem-solving strategies in children. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 419–470.
  • Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43(4), 393–404. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00596-5
  • Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2005). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45(7), 891–900. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.004
  • Cordes, S., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Crossing the divide: Infants discriminate small from large numerosities. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1583–1594.
  • Crowley, K., & Siegler, R. S. (1993). Flexible strategy use in young children’s tic-tac-toe. Cognitive Science, 17(4), 531–561. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1704_3
  • De Fockert, J. W., & Marchant, A. P. (2008). Attention modulates set representation by statistical properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(5), 789–794. doi:10.3758/PP.70.5.789
  • Dehaene, S. (2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions: The case of arithmetic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 232–259. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04469.x
  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty?. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 727–733.
  • Fazio, L. K., DeWolf, M., & Siegler, R. S. (2016). Strategy use and strategy choice in fraction magnitude comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(1), 1. doi:10.1037/xlm0000153
  • Fujimura, N. (2001). Facilitating children’s proportional reasoning: A model of reasoning processes and effects of intervention on strategy change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 589. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.589
  • Garfield, J., & Ben‐Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International StatisticalRreview, 75(3), 372–396.
  • Gaultney, J. F., Kipp, K., & Kirk, G. (2005). Utilization deficiency and working memory capacity in adult memory performance: Not just for children anymore. Cognitive Development, 20(2), 205–213.
  • Gibson, E. J., 1969. Principles of perceptual learning and development. , New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Goldstone, R. L., Landy, D. H., & Son, J. Y. (2010). The education of perception. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(2), 265–284.
  • Goldstone, R. L., Marghetis, T., Weitnauer, E., Ottmar, E. R., & Landy, D. (2017). Adapting perception, action, and technology for mathematical reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(5), 434–441.
  • Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337–364. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2703_5
  • Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eve movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 188–194. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.009
  • Heydt, R., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172. doi:10.1037/a0029333
  • Irwin, F. W., & Smith, W. A. S. (1957). Value, cost, and information as determiners of decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 229–232.
  • Jones, P. R., & Dekker, T. M. (2018). The development of perceptual averaging: Learning what to do, not just how to do it. Developmental Science, 21(3), e12584. doi:10.1111/desc.12584
  • Kuhn, D. (2013). Reasoning. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 1): Body and mind (pp. 744–764). Oxford, UK.: Oxford University Press.
  • Lathrop, R. G. (1967). Perceived variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4p1), 498–502.
  • Masnick, A. M., & Morris, B. J. (2008). Investigating the development of data evaluation: The role of data characteristics. Child Development, 79(4), 1032–1048. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01174.x
  • Masnick, A. M., & Morris, B. J. (2022). Data reasoning as a scientific reasoning competency. Education Sciences, 12(2), 71. doi:10.3390/educsci12020071
  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Henry Holt and Co. doi:10.1037/10039-000
  • Miller, P. H. (2000). How best to utilize a deficiency. Child Development, 71(4), 1013–1017. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00205
  • Morris, B. J., & Sloutsky, V. (2001). Children’s solutions of logical versus empirical problems: What’s missing and what develops? Cognitive Development, 16(4), 907–928. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00070-3
  • Morris, B. J., & Masnick, A. M. (2015). Comparing data sets: Implicit summaries of the statistical properties of number sets. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 156–170. doi:10.1111/cogs.12141
  • Morris, B. J., Todaro, R., Arner, T., & Roche, J. (2022). Do number representations influence the accuracy of children’s numerical predictions? Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874230
  • Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109), 1519–1520.
  • National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC.
  • Nuerk, H. C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line?Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82(1), B25–33. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00142-1
  • Obrecht, N. A., Chapman, G. B., & Gelman, R. (2007). Intuitive t tests: Lay use of statistical information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1147–1152. doi:10.3758/BF03193104
  • Obrecht, N. A. (2019). Sample size weighting follows a curvilinear function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(4), 614. doi:10.1037/xlm0000615
  • Park, J., & Starns, J. J. (2015). The approximate number system acuity redefined: A diffusion model approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
  • Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68(1), 29. doi:10.1037/h0024722
  • Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68(1), 29–46.
  • Petrosino, A. J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Structuring error and experimental variation as distribution in the fourth grade. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 131–156. doi:10.1080/10986065.2003.9679997
  • Rhodes, G., Neumann, M., Ewing, L., Bank, S., Read, A., Engfors, L. M., … Palermo, R. (2016). Ensemble coding of faces occurs in children and develops dissociably from coding of individual faces. Developmental Science, 21(2), e12540. doi:10.1111/desc.12540
  • Rittle‐Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice, and change in children’s strategy use. Child Development, 70(2), 332–348. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00025
  • Rothkopf, C. A., & Pelz, J. B. (2004) Head movement estimation for wearable eye tracker. In Proceedings ACM SIGCHI: Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp.123–130). ACM Press.
  • Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Johnson, J. G., Böckenholt, U., Goldstein, D. G., Russo, J. E., Sullivan, N. J., & Willemsen, M. C. (2017). Process-tracing methods in decision making: On growing up in the 70s. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(5), 442–450. doi:10.1177/0963721417708229
  • Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1
  • Siegler, R. S. (2005). Children’s learning. American Psychologist, 60(8), 769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.8.769
  • Siegler, R. S. (2007). Cognitive variability. Developmental Science, 10(1), 104–109. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00571.x
  • Siegler, R. S. (2016). Continuity and change in the field of cognitive development and in the perspectives of one cognitive developmentalist. Child Development Perspectives, 10(2), 128–133. doi:10.1111/cdep.12173
  • Sprute, L., & Temple, E. (2011). Representations of fractions: Evidence for accessing the whole magnitude in adults. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(1), 42–47.
  • Sweeny, T. D., Wurnitsch, N., Gopnik, A., & Whitney, D. (2015). Ensemble perception of size in 4–5‐year‐old children. Developmental Science, 18(4), 556–568. doi:10.1111/desc.12239
  • Thevenot, C., Barrouillet, P., Castel, C., & Uittenhove, K. (2016). Ten-year-old children strategies in mental addition: A counting model account. Cognition, 146, 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.003
  • Trumpower, D. L. (2013). Formative use of intuitive analysis of variance. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 291–313.
  • Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.
  • Waters, H. S. (2000). Memory strategy development: Do we need yet another deficiency? Child Development, 71(4), 1004–1012. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00204
  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1998). The beginning of statistical inference: Comparing two data sets. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 145–168. doi:10.1023/A:1003594832397
  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1999). The development of concepts of average. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(4), 15–39.
  • Whitney, D., & Yamanashi Leib, A. (2018). Ensemble perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 105–129. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044232
  • Young, A. G., Shtulman, A., Pammi, V. S. C., & Dutt, V. (2020). How children’s cognitive reflection shapes their science understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00011

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.