Addressing New Media with Conventional Media Planning

REFERENCES

• Aaker, David A. and Phillip K. Brown (1972). “Evaluating Vehicle Source Effects,” Journal of Advertising Research 12:4 (April), 11-16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abernethy, Avery M. (1990). “Television Exposure: Programs vs. Advertising,” Current Issues and Research in Advertising 13, 61-77.
   Google Scholar
• Abernethy, Avery M. (1991), “Physical and Mechanical Avoidance of Television Commercials: An Exploratory Study of Zipping, Zapping and Leaving,” Proceedings of the 1991 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, 233-41.
   Google Scholar
• Advertising Research Foundation (1961). Toward Better Media Comparisons. A report of the Audience Concepts Committee, Advertising Research Foundation, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Agostini, J. M. (1961). “How to Estimate Unduplicated Audiences,” Journal of Advertising Research 1:3 (March).
   Google Scholar
• Baron, Roger (1990/91). “Using the Profile-Distance Method to Select Unmeasured Magazine Prototypes.” Journal of Advertising Research 30:6 (December/January), 11-18.
   Google Scholar
• Beardon, William O., Robert S. Haden, Jay E. Klompmaker and Jesse E. Teel (1981). “Attentive Audience Delivery of TV Advertising Schedules,” Journal of Marketing Research 18:2 (May), 187-191.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, John (1963). “Net Audiences of U.S. and Canadian Magazines: Seven Tests of Agostini’s Formula,” Journal of Advertising Research 3:2 (March), 13-20.
   Google Scholar
• Caffyn, J.M. and M. Sagovsky (1963). “Net Audiences of British Newspapers: A Comparison of the Agostini and Sainsbury Methods,” Journal of Advertising Research, 3 (March) 21-24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M. (1982). “A New Method for Estimating the Effect of Media Context,” Journal of Advertising Research, 22:5 (October/November), 41-48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M. (1987). “A Theory-Based Approach to Optimal Frequency,” Journal of Media Planning 2:2 (Fall), 33-44.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M. (1996). “Beyond Effective Frequency: Getting More from Your Media Schedule through Frequency Value Planning.” MRCC Review (May), 1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M. and Cheryl Boglarsky (1991). “A Framework for Creative Strategy Development. Proceedings of the 1991 Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, April 1991, pp. 102-103.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M. and Cheryl Boglarsky (1992). “Matching Unmeasured Magazines to Target Markets: A Test of Two Methods.” Proceedings of the 1992 Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, April 1992, pp. 95-99.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M, John D. Leckenby, and Avery M. Abernethy (1996). “Overcoming the Media Planning Paradox: From (In)Effective to Optimal Reach and Frequency.” Proceedings of the 1996 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, March, pp. 34-39.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M., John D. Leckenby and Avery Abernethy (2001). “Beyond Effective Frequency: Evaluating Media Schedules Using Frequency Value Planning.” Working paper, Wayne State University Department of Marketing Working Paper Series, paper 2001.001 [URL: http://www.cis.wayne.edu/cannon/research/2001.001.pdf]
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M. and Norman Goldring (1986). “Another Look at Effective Frequency,” Journal of Media Planning 2:1 (Spring), 29-36.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Hugh M. and Edward A. Riordan (1994), “Effective Reach and Frequency: Does It Really Make Sense?,” Journal of Advertising Research, 34 (March/April), 19-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandon, Jean-Luis (1986). A Comparative Study of Media Exposure Models. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Claycamp, Henry J. and Charles W. McClelland (1968). “Estimating Reach and the Magic of K,” Journal of Advertising Research 8 (June), 44-51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, Russell H. (1961). Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results. New York: Association of National Advertisers.
   Google Scholar
• Danaher, Peter J. (1988). “Parameter Estimation for the Dirichlet-Multinomial Distribution Using Supplementary Beta-Binomial Data,” Communications in Statistics A17, 6 (June), 777-778.
   Google Scholar
• Danaher, Peter J. (1989). “An Approximate Log Linear Model for Predicting Magazine Audiences,” Journal of Marketing Research 26:4 (December), 473-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, Peter J. (1991). “A Canonical Expansion Model for Multivariate Media Exposure Distributions: A Generalization of the ‘Duplication of Viewing Law’,” Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August), 361-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, Peter J. (1992). “A Markov-chain Model for Multivariate Magazine-Exposure Distributions,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:4, 401-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donthu, Naveen, Joseph Cherian, and M. Bhargava (1993), “Factors Influencing Recall of Outdoor Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research 3 (June/July), pp.64-72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ephron, Erwin (1995). “More Weeks, Less Weight: The Shelf-Space Model of Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 35:3 (May/June), 18-23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gensch, Dennis H. (1970). “Media Factors: A Review Article,” Journal of Marketing Research 7:2 (May), 216-225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gensch, Dennis H. (1973). Advertising Planning: Mathematical Models in Advertising Media Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Jerome D. and J. Stevens Stock (1967). “Advertising Reach and Frequency in Magazines.” New York, New York: Market Math and Readers’ Digest.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982). “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing 46:2 (Summer), 92-101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Donna L. and Thomas P. Novak (2000). “When Exposure-Based Advertising Stops Making Sense (And What CDNOW Did about It).” URL: http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/papers/CDNOW.jan2001.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmans, Pierre (1966). “Measuring the Cumulative Net Coverage of Any Combination of Media,” Journal of Marketing Research, 3 (August), 267-278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982). “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research 9:3 (September), 132-140.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, John Philip (1995). “Single-Source Research Begins to Fulfill Its Promise,” Journal of Advertising Research 35:3 (May/June), 9-16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Helen (2000). “Interactivity in 2000: An Industry Viewpoint,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1) (accessed on 1/30/2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hyo-Gyoo and John D. Leckenby (2000). “Internet Research/Frequency Estimation Accuracy by Data Collection Method.” Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Conference of American Academy of Advertising.
   Google Scholar
• Kreshel, Peggy J., Kent M. Lancaster, and Margaret A. Toomey (1985), “How Leading Advertising Agencies Perceive Effective Reach and Frequency,” Journal of Advertising 14:3, 32-38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Dean M., Glen T. Cameron and Candace McKearney White (1995), “Visual Attention to Programming and Commercials: The Use of In-Home Observations,” Journal of Advertising, 24 (Spring), 1-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Walter (1963). “Net Audiences of German Magazines: A New Formula,” Journal of Advertising Research, 3 (March), 30-33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, Kent M. (1993). ADplus: For Multi-media Advertising Planning. New York: Telmar Information Services Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Leckenby, John D. and Marsha Boyd (1984). “An Improved Beta Binomial Reach/Frequency Model for Magazines,” Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Leckenby, John D. and Jongpil Hong (1998). “Using Reach/Frequency for Web Media Planning,” Journal of Advertising Research 38:2 (March/April), 7-20.
   Google Scholar
• Leckenby, John D. and Heejin Kim (1994), “How Media Directors View Reach/Frequency Estimation: Now and a Decade Ago,” Journal of Advertising Research 34:5, 9-21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckenby, John D. and Shizue Kishi (1984). “The Dirichlet Multinomial Distribution as a Magazine Exposure Model,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (February), 100-106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckenby, John D. and Marshall Rice (1985). “A Beta Binomial Network TV Exposure Model Using Limited Data,” Journal of Advertising 14:3, 13-20.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Hae-Kap (1988). Sequential Aggregation Advertising Media Models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Liebman, Leon and Edward Lee (1974). “Reach and Frequency Estimation Services,” Journal of Advertising Research 14 (August), 23-25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc, Marcel (1963), “Net Audiences of French Business Papers: Agostini’s Formula Applied to Special Markets,” Journal of Advertising Research, 3 (March), 26-29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metheringham, Richard A. (1964). “Measuring the Net Cumulative Coverage of A Print Campaign,” Journal of Advertising Research, 4 (December), 23-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naples, Michael J. (1979). Effective Frequency: The Relationship Between Frequency and Advertising Effectiveness. New York: Association of National Advertisers.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, Thomas P. and Donna L. Hoffman (1996). “New Metrics for New Media: Toward the Development of Web Measurement Standards.” URL: http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/novak/web.standards/webstand.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, Paul A. and David W. Stewart (2000), “Measuring the Effects and Effectiveness of Interactive Advertising: A Research Agenda,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1) (accessed on 1/30/2001).
   Google Scholar
• Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and David Schumann (1983). “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research 10:3 (September), 135-146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philport, Joseph C (1993), “New Insights into Reader Quality Measures,” Journal of Advertising Research 5 (October/November), pp. RC-5-RC-12.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Marshall D. and John D. Leckenby (1986). “An Empirical Test of a Proprietary Television Media Model,” Journal of Advertising Research, (August/September), 17-21.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, Shelly L. and Hugh M. Cannon. “The Many Faces of Web Users: An Exploratory Study of Functionally-Based Web-Usage Groups.” Paper presented to the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, Shelly and Ken Sheldon (1999). “The Web Motivation Inventory: Reasons for Using the Web and Their Correlates.” Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, p. 161.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, Shelly and Esther Thorson (2000). “The Interactive Advertising Model: How Users Perceive and Process Online Ads,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1) (accessed on 1/30/2001).
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, John R. and Larry Percy (1997). Advertising Communications and Promotion Management, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ratchford, Brian T. (1987). “New Insights about the FCB Grid,” Journal of Advertising Research 27:4 (August/September), 24-38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, Roland T. (1986). Advertising Media Models: A Practical Guide. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, Roland T. and Robert P. Leone (1984). “The Mixed Media Dirichlet-Multinomial Distribution: A Model for Evaluating Television-Magazine Advertising Schedules,” Journal of Marketing Research 21:1 (February), 89-99.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Don E. (1979). “Media Research Users Want,” Journal of Advertising Research 19:6 (December), 13-17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, Don E. and Martin P. Block (1986). “Empirical Estimation of Advertising Response Functions,” Journal of Media Planning 1:1 (Fall), 17-24.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Don E. and P. J. Kitchen (2000). “A Response to ‘Theoretical Concept or Management Fashion?’”, 40:5 (September-October), 17-21.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Julian L. and Johan Arndt (1980). “The Shape of the Advertising Response Function,” Journal of Advertising Research 20:4 (August), 11-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimp, Terrence A. (1997). Advertising, Promotion, and Supplemental Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications, 4th edition. The Dryden Press: Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, Thomas F. and Marla Royne Stafford (1998). “Uses and Gratifications of the World Wide Web: A Preliminary Study.” Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 174-181.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, Richard (1980). “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model,” Journal of Advertising Research 20:5 (October-November), 27-33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, Richard (1986). “How Advertsing Works: A Planning Model Revisted,” Journal of Advertising Research 26:1 (February-March), 57-66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Web, Peter H. (1979). “Consumer Initial Processing in a Difficult Media Environment,” Journal of Consumer Research 6:4 (December), 225-236.
   Google Scholar
• Web, Peter H. and Michael L. Ray (1979). “Effects of TV Clutter,” Journal of Advertising Research 19:3 (June), 7-12.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, William D. and Qimei Chen (1999). “Surf’s Up -- Differences between Web Surfers and Non-Surfers: Theoretical and Practical Implications.” Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 115-126.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, William D. and Qimei Chen (2000). “The Dimensions of Commercial Cyberspace,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1) (accessed on 1/30/2001).
   Google Scholar
• Wray, Fred (1985). “A Paradox: Advertising Is Fleeting But Its Residue is Hardrock” in Jack Z. Sissors (Ed.) New Directions in Media Planning. Evanston, IL: Advertising Division, Medill School of Journalism, Northwestern University, 137-146.
   Google Scholar
• Zufryden, Fred S., James H. Pedrick, and Avu Sankaralingam (1993). “Zapping and Its Impact on Brand Purchase Behavior.” 33:1 (February-March), 58-66.
   Google Scholar