Going Native on Social Media: The Effects of Social Media Characteristics on Native Ad Effectiveness

References

• Akpojivi, U., and A. Bevan-Dye (2015), “Mobile Advertisements and Information Privacy Perception Amongst South African Generation Y Students,” Telematics and Informatics, 32 (1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, P.J., J.C. Pike, and B.S. Butler (2011), “To Disclose or Not: Publicness in Social Networking Sites,” Information Technology and People, 24 (1), 78–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N.K., and d. boyd (2012), “Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56 (3), 320–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernoff, J., and C. Li (2008), “Harnessing the Power of the Oh-So-Social Web,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 49 (3), 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezjian-Avery, A., B. Calder, and D. Iacobucci (1998), “New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (4), 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisgin, H., N. Agarwal, and X. Xu (2012), “A Study of Homophily on Social Media,” World Wide Web, 15 (2), 213–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, E.W., K. Mezzina, and L.A. Thompson (2016), “Anonymous Social Media–Understanding the Content and Context of Yik Yak,” Computers in Human Behavior, 57 (April), 17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, M. (2016), “Native Ads Will Drive 74% of All Ad Revenue by 2021,” Business Insider, June 14, http://www.businessinsider.com/the-native-ad-report-forecasts-2016-5.
   Google Scholar
• Bortree, D., A. Xiao, F. Yang, R. Wang, M. Wu, Y. Huang, and R. Li (2016), “Credibility and Deception in Native Advertising: Examining Awareness, Persuasion, and Source Credibility in Sponsored Content,” paper presented at the 98th annual meeting of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis, MN, August.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d.m., and N.B. Ellison (2007), “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 210–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, L.F., S.B. Kleiser, and S.L. Grau (2015), “Too Much Facebook? An Exploratory Examination of Social Media Fatigue,” Computers in Human Behavior, 44 (March), 148–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S.W., and N. Kwak (2011), “Political Involvement in ‘Mobilized’ Society: The Interactive Relationships Among Mobile Communication, Network Characteristics, and Political Participation,” Journal of Communication, 61 (6), 1005–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, D., L. A. Silva, M. Mondal, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi (2015, May), “The Many Shades of Anonymity: Characterizing Anonymous Social Media Content,” ICWSM, pp. 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C., S.R. Hiltz, and K. Passerini (2007), “Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace,” Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, pp. 1725–36.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M.M., P. Brubaker, and E. Whiteside (2013), “Facebook: Examining the Information Presented and Its Impact on Stakeholders,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18 (1), 52–69.
   Google Scholar
• ———, and S. Wigley (2015), “Examining the Impact of Negative, User-Generated Content on Stakeholders,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20 (1), 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hite, R.E., and C. Fraser (1988), “Meta-Analyses of Attitudes Toward Advertising by Professionals,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon, L.C., and J.E. Grunig (1999), Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations, Institute for Public Relations, November, http://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/Guidelines_Measuring_Relationships.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., and S.H. Jeong (2016), “‘This Is a Sponsored Blog Post, But All Opinions Are My Own’: The Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure on Responses to Sponsored Blog Posts,” Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 528–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau (2013), “The Native Advertising Playbook,” December 4, http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB-Native-Advertising-Playbook2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Investopedia (2017), “Banner Advertising,” http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/impression.asp
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N.Y., and S.S. Sundar (2012), “Personal Relevance versus Contextual Relevance,” Journal of Media Psychology, 24 (3), 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledingham, J.A., and S.D. Bruning (1998), “Relationship Management in Public Relations: Dimensions of an Organization–Public Relationship,” Public Relations Review, 24 (1), 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J., V. Richmond, and J. Daly (1975), “The Development of a Measure of Perceived Communication Openness,” Human Communication Research, 1 (4), 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J.M. Cook (2001), “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks,” Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R.S., and H.M. Lefcourt (1982), “The Assessment of Social Intimacy,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 46 (5), 514–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R.E., and T.D. Wilson (1977), “The Halo Effect: Evidence for Unconscious Alteration of Judgments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (4), 250–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., B. Jin, and S.A.A. Jin (2011), “Effects of Self-Disclosure on Relational Intimacy in Facebook,” Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (5), 1974–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, H., and C.R. Scott (2007), “Anonymity and Self‐Disclosure on Weblogs,” Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1428–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, P.L.P., Q. Gao, and Y. Ding (2008), “Relationship Between the Level of Intimacy and Lurking in Online Social Network Services,” Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (6), 2757–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahni, N.S., and H.S. Nair (2016), “Native Advertising, Sponsorship Disclosure, and Consumer Deception: Evidence from Mobile Search-Ad Experiments,” working paper 3395, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA, February.
   Google Scholar
• Schauster, E. E., P. Ferrucci, and M. S. Neill (2016), “Native advertising is the new journalism: How deception affects social responsibility,” American Behavioral Scientist, 60 (12), 1408–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharethrough (2013), “Native Ads vs. Display Ads,” http://www.sharethrough.com/resources/native-ads-vs-display-ads/
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, J. (2009), “Finding Hidden Connections on LinkedIn an Argument for More Pragmatic Social Network Privacy,” in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Security and Artificial Intelligence, D. Balfanz, ed., New York: ACM, 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stelzner, M. A. (2011), “Social media marketing industry report,” Social Media Examiner, 41, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzman, F., and J. Kramer-Duffield (2010), “Friends Only: Examining a Privacy-Enhancing Behavior in Facebook,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, E. Mynatt, ed., New York: ACM, 1553–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, S.T., B. Van Der Heide, L. Langwell, and J.B. Walther (2008), “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook,” Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13 (3), 531–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2010), “Show Me Your Friends and I Will Tell You What Type of Person You Are: How One's Profile, Number of Friends, and Type of Friends Influence Impression Formation on Social Network Sites,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15 (2), 314–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B.W., and N.J. Evans (2016), “Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (2), 157–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and G. J. Golan (2016), “Native advertising and the future of mass communication,” American Behavioral Scientist, 60 (12), 1403–07. doi:10.1177/0002764216660134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Y. Huang, R. Li, D.S. Bortree, F. Yang, A. Xiao, and R. Wang (2016), “A Tale of Two Sources in Native Advertising: Examining the Effects of Source Credibility and Priming on Content, Organizations, and Media Evaluations,” American Behavioral Scientist, 60 (12), 1492–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying, L., T. Korneliussen, and K. Grønhaug (2009), “The Effect of Ad Value, Ad Placement, and Ad Execution on the Perceived Intrusiveness of Web Advertisements,” International Journal of Advertising, 28 (4), 623–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F., L. Huang, and W. Dou (2009), “Social Factors in User Perceptions and Responses to Advertising in Online Social Networking Communities,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10 (1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar