Consumers’ Privacy Concern and Privacy Protection on Social Network Sites in the Era of Big Data: Empirical Evidence from College Students

References

• Ardiansyah, Yusfi, Paul Harrigan, Geoffrey Soutar, and Timothy Daly (2018), “Antecedents to Consumer Peer Communication through Social Advertising: A Self-Disclosure Theory Perspective,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18 (1), 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Attaran, Sharmin, Elaine M. Notarantonio, and Charles J. Quigley, Jr. (2015), “Consumer Perceptions of Credibility and Selling Intent among Advertisements, Advertorials, and Editorials: A Persuasion Knowledge Model Approach,” Journal of Promotion Management, 21 (6), 703–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Susan B. (2006), “A Privacy Paradox: Social Networking in the United States,” First Monday, 11 (9), https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394/1312%2523.
   Google Scholar
• Beam, Michael, Jeffrey Child, Myiah Hutchens, and Jay Hmielowski (2018), “Context Collapse and Privacy Management: Diversity in Facebook Friends Increases Online News Reading and Sharing,” New Media and Society, 20 (7), 2296–2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleier, Alexander, and Maik Eisenbeiss (2015), “The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising,” Journal of Retailing, 91 (3), 390–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinson, Nancy H., and Matthew S. Eastin (2016), “Juxtaposing the Persuasion Knowledge Model and Privacy Paradox: An Experimental Look at Advertising Personalization, Public Policy, and Public Understanding,” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10 (1), article 7.
   Google Scholar
• Brinson, Nancy H., Matthew S. Eastin, and Laura F. Bright (2019), “Advertising in a Quantified World: A Proposed Model of Consumer Trust, Attitude toward Personalized Advertising, and Outcome Expectancies,” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 40 (1), 54–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Chen-Wei, and Jun Heo (2014), “Visiting Theories that Predict College Students’ Self-Disclosure on Facebook,” Computers in Human Behavior, 30 (January), 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, Jeffrey, Paul Haridakis, and Sandra Petronio (2012), “Blogging Privacy Rule Orientations, Privacy Management, and Content Deletion Practices: The Variability of Online Privacy Management Activity at Different Stages of Social Media Use,” Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (5), 1859–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Sujeong (2018), “What Promotes Smartphone-Based Mobile Commerce? Mobile-Specific and Self-Service Characteristics,” Internet Research, 28 (1), 105–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clason, Dennis, and Thomas Dormody (1994), “Analyzing Data Measured by Individual Likert-Type Items,” Journal of Agricultural Education, 35 (4), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Fred D., Richard Bagozzi, and Paul Warshaw (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, 35 (8), 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debatin, Bernhard, Jennette P. Lovejoy, Ann-Kathrin Horn, and Brittany N. Hughes (2009), “Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15 (1), 83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunteman, George (1989), Principal Components Analysis, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, Matthew S., Nancy H. Brinson, Alexandra Doorey, and Gary Wilcox (2016), “Living in a Big Data World: Predicting Mobile Commerce Activity through Privacy Concerns,” Computers in Human Behavior, 58 (May), 214–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe (2007), “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends:’ Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1143–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Yang, and Wenjing Xie (2014), “Teens’ Concern for Privacy when Using Social Networking Sites: An Analysis of Socialization Agents and Relationships with Privacy-Protecting Behaviors,” Computers in Human Behavior, 33 (April), 153–62.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, Marian, and Peter Wright (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, Ron (1991), “The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is It Desirable?,” Marketing Bulletin, 2 (1), 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Shannon, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan (2016), “Social Media Update 2016,” Pew Research Center, November 11, http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Babita, and Anitha Chennamaneni (2018), “Understanding Online Privacy Protection Behavior of the Older Adults: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Information Technology Management, 29 (3), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hallnäs, Lars, and Johan Redström (2002), “From Use to Presence: On the Expressions and Aesthetics of Everyday Computational Things,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 9 (2), 106–24.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, Rob, Ralf De Wolf, and Jo Pierson (2014), “Evaluating Social Media Privacy Settings for Personal and Advertising Purposes,” Info, 16 (4), 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hofacker, Charles, Edward Malthouse, and Fareena Sultan (2016), “Big Data and Consumer Behavior: Imminent Opportunities,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33 (2), 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagerson, John (2019), “Wall Street Likes Facebook’s Earnings,” Investopedia, February 1, https://www.investopedia.com/wall-street-likes-facebook-s-earnings-4586348.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Seung-A. Annie (2013), “Peeling Back the Multiple Layers of Twitter’s Private Disclosure Onion: The Roles of Virtual Identity Discrepancy and Personality Traits in Communication Privacy Management on Twitter,” New Media and Society, 15 (6), 813–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, A-Reum, and Jun Heo (2019), “Ad Disclosure vs. Ad Recognition: How Persuasion Knowledge Influences Native Advertising Evaluation,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19 (1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Ruogu (2015), “Incognito Online: Why and How People Hide Their Information,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Ruogu, Stephanie Brown, and Sara Kiesler (2013), “Why Do People Seek Anonymity on the Internet? Informing Policy and Design,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM, 2657–66.
   Google Scholar
• Karanja, Alice W., Daniel W. Engels, Ghizlane Zerouali, and Ariel Francisco (2018), “Unintended Consequences of Location Information: Privacy Implications of Location Information Used in Advertising and Social Media,” SMU Data Science Review, 1 (3), article 13.
   Google Scholar
• Kessinger, Kristen, and Aaron Berger (2014), “2014 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer—US Consumer Results,” ISACA, October, http://www.isaca.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/2014-Risk-Reward-Survey/2014-US-Consumer-Data-Summary_res_Eng_1114.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Khang, Hyoungkoo, Eyun-Jung Ki, and Lan Ye (2012), “Social Media Research in Advertising, Communication, Marketing, and Public Relations, 1997–2010,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89 (2), 279–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Senthil, Saravanakumar Kandasamy, and K. Deepa (2016), “On Privacy and Security in Social Media: A Comprehensive Study,” Procedia Computer Science, 78 (December), 114–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Haein, Hyejin Park, and Jinwoo Kim (2013), “Why Do People Share Their Context Information on Social Network Services? A Qualitative Study and an Experimental Study on Users’ Behavior of Balancing Perceived Benefit and Risk,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71 (9), 862–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Kevin, Jason Kaufman, and Nicholas Christakis (2008), “The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in An Online Social Network,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14 (1), 79–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpf, Nina, and Hilde Voorveld (2015), “Mobile Location-Based Advertising: How Information Privacy Concerns Influence Consumers’ Attitude and Acceptance,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 15 (2), 111–23.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, John (2002), “Optimizing Rating Scale Category Effectiveness,” Journal of Applied Measurement, 3 (1), 85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, Qian, Mike Yao, Ming Yang, and Caixie Tu (2017), “Predicting Users’ Privacy Boundary Management Strategies on Facebook,” Chinese Journal of Communication, 10 (3), 295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, Mary (2014), “Public Perceptions of Privacy and Security in the Post-Snowden Era,” Pew Research Center, November 12, http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/12/public-privacy-perceptions/.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Kelly, and Patrick Murphy (2017), “The Role of Data Privacy in Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (2), 135–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, Gustavo, and Guy Beker (2010), “Are Norms of Disclosure of Online and Offline Personal Information Associated with the Disclosure of Personal Information Online?,” Human Communication Research, 36 (4), 570–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, Miriam (2007), “Communication Privacy Management in Electronic Commerce,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (2), 335–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Michelle, Heejo Keum, and Ronald Yaros (2004), “Advertainment or Adcreep: Game Players’ Attitudes toward Advertising and Product Placements in Computer Games,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5 (1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, Richard, and Lee Ross (1980), Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Pearson, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, Jum, Ira Bernstein, and Jos Berge (1967), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Okazaki, Shintaro, and Morikazu Hirose (2009), “Effects of Displacement–Reinforcement between Traditional Media, PC Internet, and Mobile Internet: A Quasi-Experiment in Japan,” International Journal of Advertising, 28 (1), 77–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okazaki, Shintaro, Hairong Li, and Morikazu Hirose (2009), “Consumer Privacy Concerns and Preference for Degree of Regulatory Control,” Journal of Advertising, 38 (4), 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, Paul (2003), “Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7 (3), 101–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio, Sandra (2002), Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure, Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, Sandra, and Wesley Durham (2015), “Communication Privacy Management Theory: Significance for Interpersonal Communication,” in Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives, Braithwaite and Paul Schrodt, eds., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 335–348.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Christine (2018), “Do Consumers Want to Control Their Personal Data? Empirical Evidence,” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 110 (Spring), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ramzan, Zulfikar (2010), “Phishing Attacks and Countermeasures,” in Handbook of Information and Communication Security, P. Stavroulakis and M. Stamp, eds., Berlin: Springer, 433–448.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenman, Robert, Vidhura Tennekoon, and Laura Hill (2011), “Measuring Bias in Self-Reported Data,” International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, 2 (4), 320–32.
   Google Scholar
• Shozi, Nobubele, and Jabu Mtsweni (2016), “Big Data Privacy and Security: A Systematic Analysis of Current and Future Challenges,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, Sonning Common, United Kingdom: ACPIL, 296–303.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Aaron, and Monica Anderson (2018), “Social Media Use in 2018,” Pew Research Center, March 1, http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, Edith G, Guda Van Noort, and Hilde AM Voorveld (2014), “Understanding Online Behavioural Advertising: User Knowledge, Privacy Concerns and Online Coping Behaviour in Europe,” Computers in Human Behavior, 32 (March), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Stelzner, Michael (2018), “2018 Social Media Marketing Industry Report,” Social Media Examiner, May 7, https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/social-media-marketing-industry-report-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Sweney, Mark (2018), “Is Facebook for Old People? Over -5s Flock In as the Young Leave,” The Guardian, February 12, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/12/is-facebook-for-old-people-over-55s-flock-in-as-the-young-leave.
   Google Scholar
• Thielst, Christina (2011), “Social Media: Ubiquitous Community and Patient Engagement,” Frontiers Health Service Management, 28 (2), 3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tucker, Catherine (2014), “Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Control,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (5), 546–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Zeynep (2008), “Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites,” Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 28 (1), 20–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman (1974), “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, 185 (4157), 1124–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzialko, Adam (2018), “20 Small Business Trends and Predictions for 2019,” November 26, https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/7605-business-trend-predictions.html
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Fred D. Davis (2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, 46 (2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Hillol Bala (2008), “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions,” Decision Sciences, 39 (2), 273–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishwanath, Arun, Brynne Harrison, and Yu Jie Ng (2018), “Suspicion, Cognition, and Automaticity Model of Phishing Susceptibility,” Communication Research, 45 (8), 1146–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walrave, Michel, Ini Vanwesenbeeck, and Wannes Heirman (2012), “Connecting and Protecting? Comparing Predictors of Self-Disclosure and Privacy Settings Use between Adolescents and Adults,” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6 (1), article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, Mark (1991), “The Computer for the 21st Century,” Scientific American, 265 (3), 94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, Alan (2003), “Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy,” Journal of Social Issues, 59 (2), 431–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Debra (2019), “US Social Trends in 2019,” eMarketer, January 10, https://www.emarketer.com/content/us-social-trends-for-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, Pamela J., Bart P. Knijnenburg, and Heather Richter Lipford (2017), “Making Privacy Personal: Profiling Social Network Users to Inform Privacy Education and Nudging,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98 (February), 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Wenjing, Amy Fowler-Dawson, and Anita Tvauri (2019), “Revealing the Relationship between Rational Fatalism and the Online Privacy Paradox,” Behaviour & Information Technology, 38 (7), 742–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Hongwei, and Hui Liu (2014), “Prior Negative Experience of Online Disclosure, Privacy Concerns, and Regulatory Support in Chinese Social Media,” Chinese Journal of Communication, 7 (1), 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Mike, and Daniel Linz (2008), “Predicting Self-Protections of Online Privacy,” CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11 (5), 615–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Youn, Seounmi (2009), “Determinants of Online Privacy Concern and Its Influence on Privacy Protection Behaviors among Young Adolescents,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43 (2), 389–418.
   Google Scholar
• Zureik, Elia, and Lynda Stalker (2010), “The Cross-Cultural Study of Privacy: Problems and Prospects,” in Surveillance, Privacy, and the Globalization of Personal Information: International Comparisons, E. Zureik, L. Stalker, E. Smith, D. Lyon, and Y.E. Chan, eds., Montreal, CA: McGill -Queen’s University Press, 8–30.
   Google Scholar