165
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correspondence

Special Access Programs Warrant Further Critical Attention: Authors’ Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Justifications for Access to Unapproved Medical Interventions: An Argument for (Limited) Patient Obligations”

, &

REFERENCES

  • Caplan, A. and A. Bateman-House. 2014. Compassion for each individual's own sake. American Journal of Bioethics 14(11): 16–17.
  • Lowry, C. 2014. Right answer, wrong question: Special access, knowledge generation, and clinical trial legitimacy. American Journal of Bioethics 14(11): 22–24.
  • Rabourn, J. and R. Bedlack. 2014. SAPs: A different perspective. American Journal of Bioethics 14(11): 19–20.
  • Roth-Cline, M. and R. Nelson. 2014. FDA implementation of the expanded access program in the united states. American Journal of Bioethics 14(11): 17–19.
  • Schuklenk, U. 2014. Access to unapproved medical interventions in cases of catastrophic illness. American Journal of Bioethics 14(11): 20–22.
  • Wicks, P. and J. Heywood. 2014. Data donation could power the learning health care system, including special access programs. American Journal of Bioethics 14(11): 27–29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.