REFERENCES
- Asch, A. and D. Wasserman. 2005. Where is the sin in synecdoche? In Quality of life and human difference, ed. D. Wasserman, J. Bickenbach, and D. Wachbroit, 172–216. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Chen, S. C., and D. T. Wasserman. 2017. A framework for unrestricted prenatal whole-genome sequencing: Respecting and enhancing the autonomy of prospective parents. American Journal of Bioethics 17(1): 3–18.
- Chitty, L. S., et al. 2016. Uptake, outcomes and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome into NHS maternity care: Prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units. British Medical Journal 354:i3426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3426
- Rothman, B. K. 1993. The tentative pregnancy: How amniocentesis changes the experience of motherhood. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
- Rapp, R. 2004. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Shakespeare, T. 1999. Losing the plot? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability. Sociology of Health and Illness 21 (5):669–88.
- Shakespeare, T. 2014. Nasty, brutish and short. In Disability and the good human life, ed. J. E. Bickenbach, F. Felder, and B. Schmitz, 93–112. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.