569
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Providing Unrestricted Access to Prenatal Testing Does Not Translate to Enhanced Autonomy

, &

REFERENCES

  • Amendola, L. M., G. P. Jarvik, M. C. Leo, et al. 2016. Performance of ACMG-AMP variant-interpretation guidelines among nine laboratories in the clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium. American Journal of Human Genetics 98 (6):1067–76.
  • Anderman, A., I. Blancquaert, S. Beauchamp, and V. Déry. 2008. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: A review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86 (4):241–320.
  • Chen, S. C., and D. T. Wasserman. 2017. A framework for unrestricted prenatal whole-genome sequencing: Respecting and enhancing the autonomy of prospective parents. American Journal of Bioethics 17(1): 3–18.
  • Dar, P., et al. 2014. Clinical experience and follow-up with large scale single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy testing. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 211:527.
  • Dougherty, M. J., C. Wicklund, and K. A. Johansen Taber. 2016. Challenges and opportunities for genomics education: Insights from an Institute of Medicine roundtable activity. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 36 (1):82–85.
  • EGAPP: Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group. 2014. The EGAPP initiative: Lessons learned. Genetics in Medicine 16 (3):217–24. http://www.nature.com/gim/journal/v16/n3/full/gim2013110a.html
  • Gekas, J., L. Sylvie, R. Vardit, et al. 2016. Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: Review of clinical and ethical issues. Application of Clinical Genetics 9:15–26.
  • Kaphingst, K. A., M. Blanchard, L. Milam, M. Pokharel, A. Elrick, and M. S. Goodman. 2016. Relationships between health literacy and genomics-related knowledge, self-efficacy, perceived importance, and communication in a medically underserved population. Journal of Health Communication 21 (Suppl. 1):58–68.
  • Khoury, M. J. et al. 2009. The scientific foundation for personal genomics: Recommendations from a National Institutes of Health–Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop. Genetics in Medicine 11(8):559–67.
  • Manrai, A. K., B. H. Funke, H. L. Rehm, et al. 2016. Genetic misdiagnoses and the potential for health disparities. New England Journal of Medicine 375 (7):655–65.
  • McGuire, A. L., and W. Burke. 2008. An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: Raiding the medical commons. Journal of the American Medical Association 300 (22):2669–71.
  • Vardit, R. 2015. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): Identifying key clinical, ethical, social, legal and policy issues. Report for the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Available at: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/NIPT-background-paper-8-Nov-2015-FINAL.pdf
  • Van Driest, S. L., Q. S. Wells, S. Stallings, et al. 2016. Association of arrhythmia-related genetic variants with phenotypes documented in electronic medical records. Journal of the American Medical Association 315 (1):47–57.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.