REFERENCES
- Asch, A., and D. Wasserman. 2014. Reproductive testing for disability. In The Routledge companion to bioethics, ed. J. D. Arras, E. Fenton, and R. Kukla, 417–32. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Chen, S. C., and D. T. Wasserman. 2017. A framework for unrestricted prenatal whole-genome sequencing: Respecting and enhancing the autonomy of prospective parents. American Journal of Bioethics 17(1): 3–18.
- de Jong, A., and G. de Wert. 2015. Prenatal screening: An ethical agenda for the near future. Bioethics 29 (1): 46–55.
- Donley, G., Hull S. C., and B. E. Berkman. 2012. Prenatal whole genome sequencing: Just because we can, should we? Hastings Center Report 42 (4): 28–40.
- Fox, D. 2015. The state's interest in potential life. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2): 345–57.
- Peters, S. A., S. M. Laham, N. Pachter, and I. M. Winship. 2014. The future in clinical genetics: affective forecasting biases in patient and clinician decision making. Clinical Genetics 85 (4): 312–17.
- Pollack, A. 2012. Conflict potential seen in genetic counselors. New York Times, July 13. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/14/business/conflict-potential-seen-in-genetic-counselors-paid-by-testing-companies.html?_r=0.
- Regalado, A. 2013. Prenatal DNA Sequencing. MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/513691/prenatal-dna-sequencing.
- Sandel, M. J. 2007. The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Smith, M., and E. Eckhom. 2016. Federal judge blocks Indiana abortion law. New York Times, June 30. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/us/federal-judge-blocks-indiana-abortion-law.html.