596
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Permissibility or Priority? Testing or Screening? Essential Distinctions in the Ethics of Prenatal Testing

REFERENCES

  • Chen, S. C., and D. T. Wasserman. 2017. A framework for unrestricted prenatal whole-genome sequencing: Respecting and enhancing the autonomy of prospective parents. American Journal of Bioethics 17(1): 3–18.
  • Dondorp, W., G. de Wert, Y. Bombard, et al., on behalf of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) and the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG). 2015. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: Challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. European Journal of Human Genetics 23:1438–50.
  • Dondorp, W., and J. van Lith (Eds.). 2015. Special issue: Prenatal screening. Bioethics 29 (1):ii–iv, 1–57.
  • Entwistle, V., S. Carter, L. Trevena, et al. 2008. Communicating about screening. British Medical Journal 337 (7673):789–91.
  • Houssami, N., and D. Miglioretti, eds. 2016. Breast cancer screening: An examination of scientific evidence. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Juth, N., and C. Munthe. 2012. The ethics of screening in healthcare and medicine: Serving society or serving the patient? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • McCaffery, K., G. Jacklyn, A. Barratt, et al. 2015. Recommendations about screening. In Users' guides to the medical literature, ed. G. Guyatt, D. Rennie, M. O. Meade, and D. Cook, 593–608. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Munthe, C. 1996. The moral roots of prenatal diagnosis. Gothenburg, Sweden: Royal Society of Arts and Sciences. Available at: www.phil.gu.se/munthe/CRE-7.pdf ( accessed October 6, 2016).
  • Munthe, C. 2015. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: Individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health. A radical proposal. Bioethics 29 (1):36–45.
  • Nijsingh, N., N. Juth, and C. Munthe. 2017. Ethics of screening. In International encyclopedia of public health, ed. K. Heggenhougen and S. Quah, 2nd ed., volume 3, 28–35. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
  • Parker, L. M. 2016. An empirical ethics analysis of breast cancer screening in Australia. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/15596 ( accessed October 6, 2016).
  • Rychetnik, L., S. M. Carter, A. Barratt, and L. Irwig. 2013. Expanding the evidence on cancer screening: the value of scientific, social and ethical perspectives. Medical Journal of Australia 198 (10):536–539.
  • Williams, J., S. Carter, and L. Rychetnik. 2016. Contested guideline development in Australia's cervical screening program: Values drive different views of the purpose and implementation of organized screening. Public Health Ethics, advance access. Available at: http://phe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/07/03/phe.phw030.abstract (accessed 14 November, 2016).
  • Wilson, J. M. G., and G. Jungner. 1968. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public health papers, number 34. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.