REFERENCES
- Dickert, N. W., N. Eyal, S. Goldkind, et al. 2017. Reframing consent for clinical research: A function-based approach. American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):3–11.
- Holm, S. 2011. Withdrawing from research: a rethink in the context of research biobanks. Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269–81. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0194-8.
- International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). 2016. ICH Harmonised Guideline—Integrated addendum To ICH E6(R1): Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). Available at: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R2__Step_4.pdf
- Ploug, T., and S. Holm. 2016. Meta consent—A flexible solution to the problem of secondary use of health data. Bioethics 30 (9):721–32. doi:10.1111/bioe.12286.
- Ploug, T., and S. Holm. 2017. Informed consent and registry-based research—The case of the Danish circumcision registry. BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):53. doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0212-y.
- World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki (2013 version). Available at: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/