REFERENCES
- Beaton, A., M. Hudson, M. Milne, et al. 2016. Engaging Maori in biobanking and genomic research: A model for biobanks to guide culturally informed governance, operational, and community engagement activities. Genetics in Medicine 19 (3):345–51. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.111.
- Epstein, S. 2007. Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Gillett, G., and A. J. Tamatea. 2012. The warrior gene: Epigenetic considerations. New Genetics and Society 31 (1):41–53. doi:10.1080/14636778.2011.597982.
- Kraft, S., M. Cho, K. Gillespie, et al. 2018. Beyond consent: Building trusting relationships with diverse populations in precision medicine research. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):3–20.
- Moodley, K. 2017. Legitimacy, trust and stakeholder engagement: Biobanking in South Africa. Asian Bioethics Review 9 (4):325–34.
- Nie, J. B., L. Li, G. Gillett, J. D. Tucker, and A. Kleinman. 2017. The crisis of patient–physician trust and bioethics: Lessons and inspirations from China. Developing World Bioethics. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1111/dewb.12169.
- NIH. 2016. PMI Cohort Program announces new name: The All of Us Research Program. Available at: https://allofus.nih.gov/news-events-and-media/announcements/pmi-cohort-program-announces-new-name-all-us-research-program
- O'Neill, O. 2002. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Sabatello, M., and P. S. Appelbaum. 2017. The precision medicine nation. Hastings Center Report 47 (4):19–29. doi:10.1002/hast.736.
- Secko, D. M., N. Preto, S. Niemeyer, and M. M. Burgess. 2009. Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debate. Social Science & Medicine 68 (4):781–89. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.020.