REFERENCES
- Branswell, H. 2017. Scientist concedes his controversial MS therapy, once a source of great hope, is ‘largely ineffective’. Stat, November 28. Available at: https://www.statnews.com/2017/11/28/multiple-sclerosis-paolo-zamboni.
- Daniels, N. 2008. Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Daniels, N. 2018. Some remarks on accountability for reasonableness. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):42–43.
- Daniels, N., and J. Sabin. 1997. Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosophy & Public Affairs 26 (4):303–50. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x.
- Shrader-Frechette, K. 2018. Human rights against serious harm by polluters versus protecting “susceptible” populations. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):44–46.
- Smith, W. R. 2018. Saving environmental justice from proceduralism. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):55–56.
- Tsu, P. S. 2018. Can the AFR approach stand up to the test of reasonable pluralism? American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):61–62.
- Vincenzi, A. 2010. Newfoundland to fund study of controversial MS therapy. Globe and Mail, September 13. Available at: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/newfoundland-to-fund-study-of-controversial-ms-therapy/article1213573
- Vong, G. 2018. The distinct and complementary roles of procedural and outcome justice in health policy. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):59–60.
- Wardrope, A. 2018. Intergenerational and social justice: There is more to environmental justice than accountability for reasonableness. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):51–53.
- Wilson, Y. Y. 2018. Distributive justice and priority-setting in healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):53–54.
- Zamboni, P., L. Tesio, S. Galimberti, et al. 2018. Efficacy and safety of extracranial vein angioplasty in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurology 75(1):35–39. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3825.
- Zwolinski, M. 2018. Rights, reasonableness, and environmental harms. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):46–48.