Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Sport, and the Ideal of Natural Athletic Performance

REFERENCES

• Agar, N. 2011. Sport, simulation, and EPO. In The ideal of nature. Debates about biotechnology and the environment, ed. G. E. Kaebnik, 149–67. Baltimore, ML: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmetov, I. I., E. S. Egorova, L. J. Gabdrakhmanova, and O. N. Fedotovskaya. 2016. Genes and athletic performance: an update. In Genetics and sport, eds. M. Posthumus and M. Collins, 41–54. Basel: Karger.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. 2015. Equality of opportunity. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy ( Summer 2015 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/equal-opportunity/ (accessed April 25, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Birzniece, V. 2015. Doping in sport: effects, harm, and misconceptions. Internal medicine journal 45 (3):239–48. doi:10.1111/imj.12629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosscher, V. de, S. Shibli, H. Westerbeek, and M. Van Bottenburg. 2015. Successful elite sport policies. Achen: Meyer&Meyer.
   Google Scholar
• Breitsameter, C. 2016. How to justify a ban on doping? Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (5):287–92. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butryn, T. M. 2002. Cyborg horizons. Sport and the ethics of self-technologization. In Sports technology. History, philosophy, and policy, ed. A. Miah and S. Eassom, 111–34. Oxford UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, S. K. 2015. Coming on strong: gender and sexuality in women's sport. Champaign, Ill: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimeo, P. 2016. The myth of clean sport and its unintended consequences. Performance-enhancement and health 4 (3–4):103–10. doi:10.1016/j.peh.2016.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., and E. Dunning. 1986. Quest for excitement. Sport and leisure in the civilizing process. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, E. P. 2014. Financial Fair Play in European Club Football – What is it All About? Zurich: University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration, UZH Business Working Paper No. 328.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. 2011. Commonsense morality and the ideal of nature. What can we learn from thinking about ‘therapy'? In The Ideal of nature. Debates around biotechnology and the environment, ed. G. E. Kaebnik, 169–78. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilvoorde, I. van, R. Vos, and G. De Wert. 2007. Flopping, klapping, and gene doping. Social studies of science 37 (2):173–200. doi:10.1177/0306312706063784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, S. 2017. Bioethics: A philosophical introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. 2nd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppeler H., S. Klossner, and M. Flück. 2007. Gene expression in working skeletal muscle. In Hypoxia and the circulation. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, eds. R. C. Roach, P. D. Wagner, and P. H. Hackett, vol 618, 245–54. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaebnick, G. E. 2014. Humans in nature. The world as we find it and the world as we create it. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, B., and J. Tolleneer. 2017. Ethics of a relaxed antidoping rule accompanied by harm-reduction measures. Journal of medical ethics 43 (5):282–86. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, W. L., J. H. Wilmore, and D. L. Costill. 2015. Physiology of sport and exercise. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics. 6th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Lenk, C. 2013. Is human enhancement unnatural and would this be an ethical problem? In Athletic enhancement, human nature, and ethics. Threats and opportunities of doping technologies, eds. J. Tolleneer, S. Sterckx, and P. Bonte, 45–57. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Loland, S. 2002. Fair play in sport. A moral norm system. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loland, S., and T. H. Murray. 2007. The ethics of the use of technologically constructed high-altitude environments to enhance performance in sport. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport 17 (3):193–95. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00653.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loland, S., and A. Caplan. 2008. Ethics of technological constructed hypoxic environments in sport. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport 18 (supplement):70–75. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00834.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loland, S., and H. Hoppeler. 2011. Justifying anti-doping: The fair opportunity principle and the biology of performance enhancement. European Journal of Sport Science 12 (4):347–53. doi:10.1080/17461391.2011.566374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loland, S., and M. McNamee. 2016. Anti-doping, performance-enhancement, and ‘the Spirit of Sport’. In Doping and Public Health, eds. N. Ahmadi, A. Ljungquist, and G. Svedsäter, 111–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lopéz, B. 2014. Creating fear: the ‘doping deaths’, risk communication and the anti-doping campaign. International journal of sport policy and politics 6 (2):213–25. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.773359.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, D. C., R. Kell, and R. Kelln. 2007. The spirit of sport, morality, and hypoxic tents: logic and authenticity. Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism 32 (2):289–96. doi:10.1139/H07-013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson, C. M., M. T. Wheeler, D. Waggott, C. Caleshu, and E. A. Ashley. 2016. Sports genetics moving forward: lessons learned from medical research. Physiological genomics 48 (3):175–82. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00109.2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazanov, J. 2016. Beyond antidoping and harm minimisation: a stakeholder-corporate social responsibility approach to drug control for sport. Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (5):220–23. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayr, E. 1997. This is biology. The science of the living world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, M. J. 2008. Sport, virtues and vices. Morality plays. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. H. 2007. Enhancement. In The Oxford handbook of bioethics, ed. B. Steinbock, 491–515. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. H. 2009. In search for an ethics of sport: genetic hierarchies, handicappers general, and embodied excellence. In Performance-enhancing technologies in sports. Ethical, conceptual, and scientific issues, eds. T. H. Murray, K. J. Maschke, and A. A. Wasunna, 225–34. Baltimore, ML: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. H., and P. Murray. 2011. Rawls, sport, and liberal legitimacy. In The ideal of nature. Debates about biotechnology and the environment, ed. G. E. Kaebnik, 179–99. Baltimore, ML: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, R. 1996. Interfering with nature. Journal of applied philosophy 13 (1):1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.1996.tb00144.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Connor, D., and I. Dasgupta. 2012. Sport is arbitrary, and that's OK. The American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):30–31. doi:10.1080/15265161.2012.681337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, T., and S. Szymanski. 2014. Financial fair play in European football. Economic Policy 29 (78):343–90. doi:10.1111/1468-0327.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premdas, R. 2016. Social justice and affirmative action. Ethnic and racial studies 39 (3):449–62. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1109681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President's Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond therapy. Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J. 2015. Healthy doping. Why we should legalise performance-enhancing drugs in sport. In Routledge handbook of drugs in sport, eds. V. Møller, I. Waddington, and J. Hoberman, 350–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting, C. D., and M. A. Wund. 2014. Phenotypic plasticity and epigenetic marking: an assessment of evidence for genetic accommodation. Evolution 68 (3):656–72. doi:10.1111/evo.12348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R. L. 2007. Deserving to be lucky: Reflections on the role of luck and desert in sports. Journal of the philosophy of sport 34 (1):13–25. doi:10.1080/00948705.2007.9714706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillen, A. 1998. Sport: an historical phenomenology. Philosophy 68:344–68.
   Google Scholar
• Soligard T., M. Schwellnus, and J. J. Alonso, et al. 2016. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. British Journal of Sports Medicine 50 (17):1030–41. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper, K. 1995. What is nature? Culture, politics, and the non-human. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sperlich, B., C. Zinner, A. Hauser, H-C Holmberg, and J. Wegrzyk. 2017. The impact of hyperoxia on human performance and recovery. Sports Medicine 47:429. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0590-1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburrini, C. 2006. Are doping sanctions justified? A moral relativistic view. Sport in Society 9 (2):199–211. doi:10.1080/17430430500491264.
   Google Scholar
• Tolleneer, J., S. Sterckx, and P. Bonte (eds.). 2013. Athletic enhancement, human nature, and ethics. Threats and opportunities of doping technologies. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Venezia, A. C., and S. M. Roth. 2016. Recent research in the genetics of exercise and training adaptation. In Genetics and sport, eds. M. Posthumus, and M. Collins, 29–40. Basel: Karger.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, D. 2011. He did it on hot dogs and beer. Natural excellence in human athletic achievement. In The ideal of nature. Debates about biotechnology and the environment, ed. G. E. Kaebnik, 130–48. Baltimore, ML: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Anti-doping Agency. 2015. The WADA Code. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code. Accessed June 30th, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, X., I. Papdimitriou, R. Lidor, and N. Eynon. 2016. Nature versus nurture in determining athletic ability. In Genetics and sport, eds. M. Posthumus, and M. Collins, 15–28. Basel: Karger.
   Google Scholar