https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-6553
REFERENCES
- DeGrazia, D. 1999. Advance directives, dementia, and ‘the someone else problem’. Bioethics 13(5): 373–391. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00166.
- Engel, P. 2009. Pragmatic encroachment and epistemic value. In Epistemic value, eds. A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Hershenov, D. 2013. Who doesn’t have a problem of too many thinkers? American Philosophical Quarterly 50(2): 203–208.
- Koch, P. 2009. An alternative to an alternative to brain death. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83: 89–98. doi: 10.5840/acpaproc2009838.
- Limbaugh, D. G. 2016. Animals, advance directives, and prudence: Should we let the cheerfully demented die? Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 2(4): 481–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2016.10.006.
- Lowe, E. J. 2008. Personal agency. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- McMahan, J. 2002. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Olson, E. T. 1997. The human animal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Walsh, E. 2020. Cognitive transformation, dementia, and the moral weight of advance directives. The American Journal of Bioethics 20(8): 54–64.
- Zimmerman, D. 2008. Problems for animalism. Abstracta (1): 23–31.